13
ClassicalMindset 13 points ago +13 / -0

I won't argue with you because it's pointless because I know who you are. What I will say is this for anyone observing the conversation. Take a mental note. In 10 years, reevaluate where we are and the "progress" society has made. When in 10 years, we still haven't fixed the problems and it seems things are getting worse not better, remember this conversation thread. That is all.

You see, I will be proven right and you will be proven wrong in time.

11
ClassicalMindset 11 points ago +11 / -0

the FPÖ has focused on describing itself as a Heimat and "social" party. This means that the party has portrayed itself as a guarantor of Austrian identity and social welfare state. Economically, it has supported regulated liberalism with privatisation and low taxes, combined with support for the welfare state

Support for the welfare state? lol...

By 2010, under Heinz-Christian Strache's leadership, the party became more supportive of Israel. In December 2010, the FPÖ (along with the representatives of like-minded rightist parties) visited Israel, where they issued the "Jerusalem Declaration", which affirmed Israel's right to exist and defend itself, particularly against Islamic terror.[123][124][125] The party also recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital.[126] At the FPÖ's invitation, Israeli Druze MK Ayoob Kara of the Likud party subsequently visited Vienna.[127] After the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel, FPÖ leader Kickl expressed unequivocal support for Israel's right to self defense and called for Austria to advocate for Israel within the EU by opposing resolutions critical of Israel and supporting Israeli security measures.

It's all so typical. "far-right" support for Israel. Merely an "anti-immigration" party. Jews win no matter which side wins, lmao.

Europeans are so fucked.

5
ClassicalMindset 5 points ago +6 / -1

I guess we'll have to wait and see. I don't consider support for Palestine as anything better than support for Israel. The young people dislike Israel for the wrong reasons which is going to be just as much of a problem in the future.

-2
ClassicalMindset -2 points ago +1 / -3

If White cuckservatives are this stupid, maybe we do need a cleanse? Jews dominate the world with like 40m of them and there's what, 400m White people while 300m of them are retarded? I'd rather have 100m quality Whites running the world than 400m Whites with 300m of them being shabbos goys. Let the Muslims overrun White countries and let's reestablish a new home base somewhere else with significantly less White people then let's reconquer the whole world for fun.

1
ClassicalMindset 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here's the thing though. I understand that when my enemies want to do something, they will do it regardless of what I think is right or wrong so I will not handicap myself with morality when I know my enemies will not do the same. I will tell my enemies they should not do bad things in hopes my enemies handicap themselves by sticking to the morality I tell them they ought to stick with but when I engage in attacking my enemies I will do whatever it takes to win and morality be damned.

5
ClassicalMindset 5 points ago +7 / -2

Can we all just agree breakdancing is for faggots and isn't a sport then move on?

1
ClassicalMindset 1 point ago +2 / -1

Edit: handshake account and most posts are removed as a result of being banned from communities. Okay.

That means what I'm posting is truth. Don't you remember 2015 and 2020? If the mods are banning you when you aren't spamming or posting anything illegal then what you're saying is the right thing and it's highly effective.

Everything you cite as a bad regulation is the opposite.

Wrong

Expand

  1. Driver's license - As you pointed out, it's a bunch of simple questions anyone can answer. That means it's worthless at creating any sort of standard. All it is, is needless red-tape and costs to the public for 0 gain. If someone can't drive, they're going to get pulled over by the cops for violating laws anyhow or into accident as you suggest, though not necessarily dangerous ones. Most people actually do care about their own life too and aren't just going to immediate hop in a car and kill someone. The dangerous drivers are going to drive regardless of having a license or not. Just reduce immigration to 0 and deport all non-Whites from your country. That will improve the average driving quality with or without any licensing.

  2. Right to repair - If you don't like the seller making it impossible to repair their product then don't buy their product. Simple. It's completely and utterly unneeded regulation which in the end will only stifle innovation and add additional unforeseen costs without gain.

  3. Building codes and warranty acts - Again, if you don't like the product, don't buy it. Building codes add significant additional costs to buildings for gains that many people may not necessarily need. Better to have a larger discrepancy in quality of housing and thus a larger price range from low-high than it is to set a minimum standard for housing thus raising the minimum cost for housing and making housing more unaffordable. The public would eventually learn how to understand warranties themselves and the government doesn't need to intervene. There's already legislation around misrepresentation/fraud and the warranties act is unneeded.

0
ClassicalMindset 0 points ago +3 / -3

The ideal amount of regulation is the least amount of regulation possible.

Driver's licenses are terrible regulations by the way.

Right to repair laws are also terrible regulations.

Building codes and warranty acts are also terrible regulations.

You are right about the bad regulations.

For the ideal amount of regulation take whatever the average person thinks is good regulation and cut it down by about 90% then we're closer to the ideal.

1
ClassicalMindset 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's easy to see on a geopolitical scale. All countries without nukes are not taken seriously by the USA. Only countries with nukes are given any respect. That alone should indicate to every country that they must acquire nukes to secure their sovereignty.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
view more: ‹ Prev