Mainly thinking about this because of some of the comments in this post here, but I do think while what we currently have right now is way too much regulation.
Some examples of 'good regulation' in my opinion would be the existence of drivers' licenses, 'right to repair' laws, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and building codes.
While some notable 'bad regulation' is anything to do with 2A restrictions and the modern health care industry.
Overall, I'm just trying to gauge what is good vs bad regulation.
That means what I'm posting is truth. Don't you remember 2015 and 2020? If the mods are banning you when you aren't spamming or posting anything illegal then what you're saying is the right thing and it's highly effective.
Wrong
Driver's license - As you pointed out, it's a bunch of simple questions anyone can answer. That means it's worthless at creating any sort of standard. All it is, is needless red-tape and costs to the public for 0 gain. If someone can't drive, they're going to get pulled over by the cops for violating laws anyhow or into accident as you suggest, though not necessarily dangerous ones. Most people actually do care about their own life too and aren't just going to immediate hop in a car and kill someone. The dangerous drivers are going to drive regardless of having a license or not. Just reduce immigration to 0 and deport all non-Whites from your country. That will improve the average driving quality with or without any licensing.
Right to repair - If you don't like the seller making it impossible to repair their product then don't buy their product. Simple. It's completely and utterly unneeded regulation which in the end will only stifle innovation and add additional unforeseen costs without gain.
Building codes and warranty acts - Again, if you don't like the product, don't buy it. Building codes add significant additional costs to buildings for gains that many people may not necessarily need. Better to have a larger discrepancy in quality of housing and thus a larger price range from low-high than it is to set a minimum standard for housing thus raising the minimum cost for housing and making housing more unaffordable. The public would eventually learn how to understand warranties themselves and the government doesn't need to intervene. There's already legislation around misrepresentation/fraud and the warranties act is unneeded.