It truly is that simple.
It is a losing proposition to lower property values. He could pivot to' "I don't want to lower property values because that harms existing owners. I want to double people's wages so they can afford to buy houses at their current prices."
This kind of message might work to not upset the boomers and keep the young generation onboard.
Yeah, it's not quite the same. For the cost of cooland to the average consumers, the time-to-price ratio isn't really there such that premixed cooland you can put right in is great.
For illegal drugs or wholesale chemicals bought on bulk, it doesn't make sense. The cost savings more than makes up for the added work/time yet people don't seem to notice/care.
There's a psychological factor at play. I never understood how prevalent this psychology was until I was telling a friend about a health supplement I liked but the supplement was a little expensive; however, it was the exact same price as a similar health supplements my friend had recommended to me in the past. One stark difference: the supplement he recommended came with 5x the pills in a bottle but you were supposed to take 5 a day and my supplement was just 1 pill a day. Both lasted 30 days. I felt the supplement I recommended worked way better and there was a noticeable difference whereas his not so much so I told him to try mine. He wouldn't because in his mind he was paying the same price for 1/5 the amount of pills. The number of pills seriously impacted how he perceived the supplement. To me, if you get better results with 1 pill isn't that better than worse results with 5 pills at the same price? Not how he saw it though... He saw it as he was paying 5x as much...
It's weird how some people think.
I've done enough history research into the Catholic Church to conclude that it was never "based" and it was always a thorn in the side of White people.
The progress that occured in Christiandom was not because of Christianity (or the Catholic Church) but in spite of it. Today, much of our problems are can be linked to the disease that Christianity brought on Western society including especially the Catholic Church.
The quote: "the purpose of a system is what it does" comes to mind. Never, in the history of Catholicism has what the church done actually been beneficial to White people as a whole. Given that is what is does, that is its purpose.
The Catholic Church's purpose is anti-White.
I realize this is a tough pill to swallow for a lot of right-wing people. I get it because when people realized their reality was a mess they looked to solutions and the moral rigidity of a religion, like Christianity, seemed like the solution to the problems of reality but it really is no solution. No matter how hard you believe, you cannot force others to believe. You need rewards/punishments. You need power. A religion's power over a person is only what one voluntarily gives it and the people you need power over are people who'll never voluntarily give the church any thus the religion is useful as anything other than a tool to control yourself given the power you give it. For some people, religion is a useful tool for self-discipline when they lack that discipline on their own but religion cannot fix society. In fact, when analyzing how Christianity operates, in practice it is actually a highly destructive religion that harms White people.
If you want solutions don't turn to religion. Gain real hard power and use it to force the solution you want. Yes, that means you and most people are powerless in today's world and always will be. Welcome to reality.
"Wow what a deal on steak!" Buys a steak cut to half the thickness of a good cut of steak.
You should love your own people and show compassion to your own people. Not to everyone.
The problem with delivering quality drugs is that the drug users have no self respect and would rather buy cheap counterfeit drugs than more expensive quality ones. The dealers adapt to the market demand.
I know a guy in the chemical business and he constantly complains how his products are 3-5x more concentrated than his competitors at double the price yet his customers don't realize this (even though he markets it this way). All customers need to do is dilute the chemical and they have twice as much product for the same price as his competitors but customers cannot figure this out. I'm not making a metaphor for drugs either, he sells legal chemicals (mainly cleaning supplies to hospitals, hotel chains, etc...). If regular people not on drugs in business can't figure out the dilute the chemical to get cheaper product, then there's no hope for drug users.
Democracy doesn't mean "checks -and-balances" on power.
Yes, it does.
In Canada for example, the Prime Minister has essentially the same power as a dictator outside of the separation of powers set in the Constitution. Without such a document, which isn't required in a Democracy and which can still exist in a Constitutional Monarchy), the Prime Minister would be no different than a dictator.
Not sure why you're arguing this. Nothing about a democracy says the guy who is elected can't act like a dictator.
Edit - Honestly, it sounds to me like it's not democracy you hate but bureaucracy.
Democracy doesn't mean "checks -and-balances" on power. You can democratically elect a dictator not so different than how the Roman Senate appointed dictators when required.
Some monarchies have so many checks-and-balances on their power through whatever means (such as threats to family) that they too are unable to accomplish anything of note.
There's nothing stopping a King from owning foreign businesses and having all his prosperity tied to foreigners.
I know leftists who are anti-Israel. Under no circumstance are these leftists allies. Their concept of the "JQ" is non-existent. We'll still have to fight all these leftists in the end anyhow and they won't help us rid of the jew
I mean, even if you don't officially have a restricted suffrage democracy a monarchy with strong nobles operates the same more or less because the will of the aristocracy still matters even if on paper the monarch has absolute power.
Universal suffrage democracy is trash. Restricted suffrage democracy is fine still. Essentially, any society should maybe have 10% of its population capable of voting (the male aristocracy, essentially). No one else should be allowed to vote.
Caesar gave a lot of people Roman citizenship that shouldn't have had it. Caesar actually did a lot of bad things. He wasn't really that great at all tbh.
Yes. The ridigity of the aristocracy started falling apart as new money merchants wanted equal status as founding families.
At least he admits that jews are illegal immigrants to Israel.
Rome. This happened to Rome.
Romans imported in tons of non-Romans to work for cheap while actual Romans left the core cities to the borderlands to find labor. Before long, the military/police was full of foreigners and the Romans were upset at the rent-seeking behavior of the rulers.
This has all happened before.
We should of course be doing our own corporate espionage also.
This is true but we don't need to be so slow on the uptake. We have the capability to be faster and more adaptable than the Chinese. It's time to dust off the old colonizer uniforms and actually start trying. Would help if we could get rid of the infestation in our home countries first ofc.
As far as I'm concerned every leftist in every Western country is a paid MOSSAD agitator so they're valid targets.
I don't actually have any qualms about killing the right people. I was pointing out the 1m deportations...
What do you mean it wasn't 6m? This is antisemitic!
I mean the last time I saw the show, I didn't even know what a feminist was.
You shouldn't be scared of a little competition. If they are shitcans, no one will buy them.
They should. Make the power rangers a bunch of misogynists and the girl power rangers are just brainwashed feminine women who are slaves to the patriarchy. Rita is a feminist who is trying to rescue the girl power rangers and promote feminism in society but the pesky power rangers keep foiling her plans.
I actually found when I did this I didn't lose weight but gained weight because I found cooking meat (and cleaning) so much easier than cooking carbs and I loved meat. I ended up eating more while only eating meat than when I wasn't eating meat.
At the end of the day, you lose weight by eating less and it doesn't matter how you do it. A big thing about the carnivore diet that's probably overlooked is for some men, it might lead to better testosterone production and estrogen ratios relative to T levels which if the levels were imbalanced often leads to water retention which makes people look fat so the diet seems to help with "losing weight" to some more than others.