11
Bouldabassed 11 points ago +12 / -1

Yes, actually, it would, because I get severe second hand embarrassment when you accuse others of acting like leftists when you in that very comment are acting like a deranged leftist. "Retarded," while unoriginal, is a considerable improvement over exposing yourself that badly.

12
Bouldabassed 12 points ago +15 / -3

Maga cultists

Because as we all know, immediately labeling anyone who disagrees with you as some super radical and extreme entity isn't page number one in the handbook of leftist tactics.

17
Bouldabassed 17 points ago +17 / -0

There's a lot to unpack there, but honestly people need to push back against the very concept of "hate crimes" even being a legitimate thing in the first place. It's very rapidly approaching something I would consider to be completely normalized even among normie conservatives.

12
Bouldabassed 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes and no. Yes this is more in line with what people want. No, DeSantis would not resurrect his dead campaign if he started doing this. It would very blatantly be an act and not genuine; not going to bring anyone who has already been convinced he's a swamp dweller back on board.

1
Bouldabassed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure he was "convicted" partially in that sexual assault case where the lady based her assault story off of an episode of Law and Order. Perhaps that is what they are talking about? But I'm pretty sure that is a civil case and not one of the indictments being discussed.

And I'm not an expert on legal jargon but I doubt the word "convicted" even applies when losing a civil judgement.

8
Bouldabassed 8 points ago +8 / -0

1.2 million would still probably be way too excessive. They literally dished out a verdict over 1000x more harsh than what is reasonable to send a message. This is a leftist judiciary in action.

3
Bouldabassed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not going to waste my time commenting on every bit of lunacy here, but this specific one stood out to me:

it wasn't even legal in some places to grow your own food

Almost exclusively a problem caused by the overreach of busy body bureaucrats and Karens. Can't grow your own food, that might be an eyesore! Can't keep chickens, what if they're loud??? In what world is this a problem caused by the so-called right wing that they prop up as the cause of all their problems?

9
Bouldabassed 9 points ago +9 / -0

More of a causal link between this raid and her death than Chauvin's knee and George Floyd's death but I know we live in clown world and that would never be acknowledged in court.

by Lethn
2
Bouldabassed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolute best of luck to you. You're a regular around here so I don't think anyone should be butthurt about self promotion. It might be a little different if you were a handshake account. Please keep us updated when release something.

6
Bouldabassed 6 points ago +6 / -0

Perhaps a cope but, at least in Ohio's case, we can still win in November. This was merely to raise the bar for the vote percentage they needed to pass their abortion shit. If Issue 1 fails with 55% or less no votes, we absolutely have a fighting chance still. A lot of well meaning people were tricked into voting no on Issue 1, but that will be a lot harder when abortion is directly the issue at hand. At the very least it will be a closer vote; whether it will be enough we will see.

2
Bouldabassed 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had thought it was a lost cause, but a recent poll I saw actually had Yes being ahead by a point which shocked me. I know polling is dubious, but in my experience for Ohio, polling bias tends to be in the other direction by a few points.

I heard about the abortion measures in other states, but were these all constitutional amendments? And my understanding is that in at least some of the cases, the wording was intentionally misleading and the pro life people were terrible at getting the word out to combat that. Also, this would theoretically give a blank check for 9 month abortions.

So I think all of the following would be in favor of it failing in November:

-It is a constitutional amendment and not just a law. Some people may look askance to enshrining abortion into the constitution even if they don't really care about it that much (like myself)

-The wording is pretty clear in my opinion. One readthrough takes about a minute and it is pretty clear what you need to vote to get which outcome

-There is a distinct lack of any limits within the measure. Even people who are lukewarm on abortion are usually not okay with 9 month shit

But some of that relies on voters not being retarded and actually reading what they're voting on. Very possible for it to pass still, but if issue 1 next week only fails by 5 points or so, I would be pretty optimistic. Worried, but optimistic.

8
Bouldabassed 8 points ago +8 / -0

For what its worth, I haven't gotten the feeling that Ohio has much fortification going on. Doesn't mean it couldn't happen, but I wouldn't count on it.

The thing with this is, a lot of well meaning right leaning people have been tricked into voting no. Whereas the November amendment is much harder to trick an anti abortion person into voting for. If this proposal barely fails then I think we have a good shot to gain a few percentage points to win in November. Especially considering the state does not support abortion and that turnout will be higher then.

7
Bouldabassed 7 points ago +7 / -0

Impossible to downplay this one. If it's true, the implications are too massive to keep under wraps. The paper is already out there.

5
Bouldabassed 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm leaning toward it actually being true. At the very least, if it isnt, it will be exposed fairly swiftly. The material is very cheap and not extremely difficult to make. From what I can tell it has already been replicated by multiple entities so this might be the real deal.

The insane thing is, because of the relative simplicity of making it, this is something that could have feasibly been discovered 100 or 200 years ago by chance.

2
Bouldabassed 2 points ago +2 / -0

FWIW, my boss (Japanese dude) watches Spy x Family with his family and apparently his kids like it. His kids are 14, 12, and 7. Oldest is a son and the younger two are daughters.

That being said, I personally agree that Spy Family is more oriented towards the really young girls and the older ones, while kind of skipping over that middle young adult demographic (not that it can't be enjoyed by them as well).

3
Bouldabassed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seems like there are already a lot of good recommendations for things early teen girls would enjoy; most of what immediately came to mind has already been said.

For the one that likes romance, perhaps Taisho Otome Fairy Tale would be enjoyable. Very wholesome.

10
Bouldabassed 10 points ago +11 / -1

It's super naive to think that wouldn't play out the same way today. Wasn't the court case just a year or so ago? If it's a case where even boomer conservatives are tripping over themselves to say how racist the dudes were, they never had a chance. Regardless of how much the facts were on their side.

8
Bouldabassed 8 points ago +8 / -0

We aren't talking about him in this subthread. The conversation shifted to some other dude.

15
Bouldabassed 15 points ago +16 / -1

The difference is you are using the globalist definition of the ethnicity, AKA magic dirt theory, wherein just being born in the place makes one "German." Under such a definition, someone named Mohammed bin Shamahad who has nothing but disdain for German people, culture, and traditions is German just because his mother pooped him out in Germany.

Not many people here are going to agree with that even if the average normie might bob their head up and down like a bobblehead and clap like a seal at the idea.

-1
Bouldabassed -1 points ago +1 / -2

Okay? Point is, his activity is far from rising to the level of clogging up the board. And even if he's a meme, it's not like he never has worthwhile comments. People can and do downvote him if his comments are retarded.

2
Bouldabassed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ahahaha now that you mention that it sounds familiar. Thanks for the heads up, I totally missed that one lmao

7
Bouldabassed 7 points ago +7 / -0

Over the past several years leading up to 2020, they had been building up a borderline religious devotion to the word "vaccine." Anything that receives that label is infallible in their eyes. Which is why the sleight of hand that was pulled to change the definition of the word such that the mRNA shots could be called vaccines was so crucial.

Another thing is the shitty personality flaws these people have. They really care deeply about what others think of them. They really love, and base so much of their personalities around, being in an in group and being able to be snobby, insufferable bitches to an outgroup. So when questioning even one aspect of one vaccine let's them be insufferable towards that person and call them "anti-vax" they gobble that shit right up. And perish the thought of them ever questioning their secular religion. That might have them be associated with the outgroup and effectively exiled. Can't have that.

It might sound like a stretch to some, but trust me when I say, the minds of many of these insufferable lunatics work very similar to the above, even if they aren't aware of it on the conscious level.

Edit: it's very similar to the whole thing with flat earthers (with the only major difference being flat earthers aren't correct). You ever hear leftists who are just very loud about how much hate and disdain they have for flat earthers? They are gaining significant satisfaction in placing themselves higher than these people when they themselves havent done anything except believe what they've been told. I should clarify that I'm not a flat earther, but when I overhear people talking about it who are I just chuckle, think "who fucking cares what these randos think" and move on with my day. I don't start on an impassioned rant about how uneducated they are. It comes down to fundamental personality flaws that these crazy leftists have.

2
Bouldabassed 2 points ago +6 / -4

This forum isn't high enough traffic to justify banning people for milquetoast shit like that even if he can be annoying. Let people downvote his comments if it truly is that bad.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›