Oh don't worry about the down vote, I figured OP has just tagged everyone who actually tried to call him on his bluff.
One idea is not exactly a foregone conclusion of the other, but it is one of the conclusions that you can reach. One of the arguments goes: If all men are made in God's image, and God is infinitely more important than any worldly matter, then all men are essentially equal in the face of the glory of God.
"All men are created equal" is a sentiment that had been simmering up and down in theologians for centuries before America was even discovered. Pope Gregory I (p533, at the bottom) put it in one of his moral treatises. John Ball (wiki IK, but it'll do as a summary) preached it as he rabble roused a peasant revolt. There are more, even back then theology was as trend chasing and Zeitgeisty as politics, so it had ebbs and flows of popularity, but notably the idea was never widely persecuted against enough to ever disappear.
It's a simplification that I think was aimed upward and often used cynically or sincerely to imply that "these men are not fit to lead you, God is" without explicitly crossing into treason. But had the unintended effect of entrenching people against the very idea that some people are more beneficial/detrimental to your community than others when looking at their peers or downwards.
Heh, fair enough, I'm only familiar with his sperging here not elsewhere in the wild.
Was wondering if maybe he wasn't too far gone to calm tf down if he just got the raving out his system.
I mean he does have "a females will genocide us" theory to sell, and he has always been banned long before gasses out on it. The kernel is there.
Ah yes, the incongruous child rant about how inflation is way more important to stop than child sterilisation as a fashion choice. Because using a child as your sock puppet isn't a deeply unsympathetic move that makes the adults behind it look like both retards and monsters.
Hold.on, let him cook, maybe if he's finally allowed to vent his systems on his female genocide theory he'll actually chill out a bit.
"I've had to restrain violent people many times" - Elonwy of Pork
She sat on them, didn't she?
Hold up, are you trying to say the literal doctrinal interpretation of created in god's image wasn't already a thing before the declaration of independence paraphrased it?
So easy I'll name two. Valuing turning the other cheek over defending themselves effectively. And pretending all men (or women) were created equal.
Christianity has had plenty of benefits, but the organized church has obviously fumbled the ball terribly to the point where too many modern Christians are even praising their kids being mutilated and abused in front of them.
The trailer with her rescuing the girl is a red herring, the primary game mechanic will be throwing any younger, hotter women to the monsters as quickly as possible before your sanity bar depletes
Honestly I always thought the entire point of the using a vague, abstract nomenclature like left-right is so you can lump a bunch of goals that aren't easily described quickly together. E.g. Whole post revolution political dockets.
Using left-right as a simple stand-in for "big gov-no gov" does make left-right a properly opposed and philosophically cohesive axis. But I just don't see the point of the nomenclature existing at all that point, when you can just as succinctly describe the single axis with its actual foundational premise. It's just inviting the confusion when there's an already hijacked homonym out there.
TBH unless you're trimming the definition down to a single issue like big gov Vs small gov, I'm not sure it is a unified axis without the definitions to coalesce around. For lots of things on the left-right axis there's no intrinsic reason for them to be linked other than historic "that's the left's position, and that's the right's". Example, I don't think there's an intrinsic link between wanting the government to coddle layabouts and ignoring the obvious differing average abilities between the sexes, or idolising faggotry and sexual deviance. I don't think it's inherent human nature to link those together, I think it's a learned behavior.
Without that historic baggage I think you would have so many more people with mixed political ideals that the whole axis breaks apart.
He's been showing signs for a little while, bullshit said in interviews and on his website in the last year or two. But I think this is the first time it's trickled down into his actual books.
I'd be annoyed at your toadying over the idea of wilfully breaching contractual obligations and hungry.
However, I cannot think of a time in history when it became popular to advocate murdering people in the streets that wasn't followed by leftists committing mass atrocities.
Both ancient Rome and Greece had their periods of populist unrest and political mob killings. Many of those were notably nationalist in flavor, targeting politicians who were perceived to have betrayed their countrymen.
Granted leftism wasn't even a thing back then so it's hard to say exactly how much overlap there was with "leftists" back then, but at the very least their patriotism and nationalism are anathema to the globalist bootlicking lefties of the modern era.
I suspect you have to keep looking pre-marx or pre- rousseau for more readily available examples though. Not that unrest became inherently leftie after that, but those philosophies have emboldened lefties so that they typically take the first strike advantage in such states of unrest since their invention. And with that advantage have taken control of those cultural moments more often than not ever since.
Fun fact, he was originally up for felony battery charges. I.E what this act would have been charged with in 99% of districts in the US, if it wasn't a judge.
Fine, call it inconsistent rather than excessive then. Supposedly what he was looking at before that stunt was 4 years. Even if she was throwing the book at him the length of incarceration went up ~600-1500% once it became personal.
Literally the only time you can guarantee a female judge will apply an excessive sentence is if the crime inconvenienced her personally.
And the handful of aliens the male protagonist kills are street punks.
One which is openly complaining about losing its license, presumably its driving license, going right into a flashback about protag's family who got hit and runned.
None of that pansy British boarding school larp shit. This deep in the internet dystopia pit we use the Neuromancer AIs to vivisect people's psyches thank you very much.
At some point the distinction stops mattering, the correct response is to remove them either way.
If he's 26 there's a good chance he was in college in the 2020 lockdowns. A college guy playing amongus during lockdown, that graduation zoom call must have been full of trained killers!
All I can think is maybe it's a real "it's not about the money it's about the message" moment, and he had intent to go immediately onto making more examples.
Mental issue more like
Well if he's your perfect taste I guess you're in luck, since he's basically a living, unevolving, generic musical fossil. Good for you.
Yeah, I guess it's just a shame. Even as retarded his hissyfits got, at least he didn't used to be a total NPC all the time.