If you were interested in proving the poster wrong, you could have just mentioned that HPV is linked to certain cancers. It's true and commonly known. If they doubted it, they can check for themselves.
Instead you posted AI spam that we're going to completely ignore.
The funny part is you and it are still completely wrong. Gizortnik said that cancers aren't viruses. You said "cancers are related to virii." You changed the claim to give an answer, that wasn't even your own, that didn't refute anything he said.
ALSO "virii" is not not the plural of virus. Even in Latin, it wouldn't be virii.
Here, in case this helps you:
Copilot:
What is the plural of virus
The plural of "virus" is "viruses." Some people wonder if it should be "viri" or "virii," but those forms aren't correct in English.
"Viruses" is the standard and widely accepted plural form.
Is cancer a virus
Cancer itself is not a virus, but certain viruses can increase the risk of developing cancer.
If you actually wanted to contradict him, you'd want to focus on prophalactic vs. therapeutic vaccines, because vaccines aren't specifically preventative and aren't specifically for viruses.
Vaccines literally never cure anything. That's not how they work.
Vaccines would have to prevent cancer, which is damn near impossible.
Moreover, cancer isn't a fucking virus. You can't inoculate someone against cancer because it's a defect in the cell's genetic code.
I'm willing to bet this man literally doesn't know anything about what that mRNA injection is or does.
My guess is that the mRNA injection is a GENE THEREAPY which tries to combat the malformed genes of the cancer cells.
Again, giving them the benefit of the doubt, it's still not a vaccine.
If we wanted a chat bot's "thoughts", we'd have asked it ourselves.
If you were interested in proving the poster wrong, you could have just mentioned that HPV is linked to certain cancers. It's true and commonly known. If they doubted it, they can check for themselves.
Instead you posted AI spam that we're going to completely ignore.
The funny part is you and it are still completely wrong. Gizortnik said that cancers aren't viruses. You said "cancers are related to virii." You changed the claim to give an answer, that wasn't even your own, that didn't refute anything he said.
ALSO "virii" is not not the plural of virus. Even in Latin, it wouldn't be virii.
Here, in case this helps you:
Copilot:
If you actually wanted to contradict him, you'd want to focus on prophalactic vs. therapeutic vaccines, because vaccines aren't specifically preventative and aren't specifically for viruses.