The entire purpose is to destabilize society and undermine culture, only because they cannot accomplish what they want though force and overt action. Revolution will not work in countries that are too unified, so they must be fractured first.
That's why the US government has been calling "white supremacy" as the number one threat. They simply mean all white people are their enemy.
Biden administration officials told Fox News the "complex and shifting" domestic terrorism threat landscape has created "significant challenges for law enforcement," specifically on internet-based communications platforms like social media, "file-upload sites," and end-to-end encrypted platforms, which officials say combined can "amplify threats to public safety."
They want you censored and isolated, so you are the easiest to pick off.
I doubt it. It might be slightly less corrupted than the others, but that's not saying much. If there is something that is actually threatening in terms of news, it would never be allowed to get off the ground.
As time goes on it will get subverted like anything else and become controlled opposition or simply be dismantled. Until then it may be decent, depending on who is in charge.
One thing you will notice a lot is people talking about Critical Race Theory, but never the original Critical Theory. That's because the link to the Frankfurt school's cultural marxism is just too evident. It is a direct connection between communism, jewish identity, and academia. To say otherwise would just be a lie. You only need to go look at the Wikipedia page to see that.
Postmodernism, women's studies, the sexual revolution and so called "Queer theory" are also direct descendants of that lineage. This has been largely ignored as a talking point in favour of looking at the race issue only.
The reason why companies keep lurching to the left cannot be solely some grand elite agenda, because there's no way somebody invited Devolver Digital or some of the other low-tier names that went hard left to the supposed Great Reset meetings.
They don't need to have been invited. They just need to have employees who were educated based on institutional indoctrination from things like Universities. There are very many cases of healthy young adults who go into college or some social circles and become entirely corrupted.
We learned this years ago, it's just that many people assumed they would "Grow out of it once they get a job and have to interact with the real world" instead the opposite is true. They are insulated and the rest of the world needs to bend to conform to them. Otherwise they get slandered and attacked on all angles.
Boycotts don't work because the whole financial system is poisoned from the top down. No amount of people rallying together can compete with their money against the people printing the money and doing the banking.
Yeah, Street Fighter 5 was under a lot of censorship for things like R. Mika. Mr Wiz, a person working for Evo, pulled ads for DoA6 for being too sexy. Until he was later ousted from working there due to sexual allegations.
For the sake of advertisements there is a lot of pressure on developers to reduce the amount of sexuality in their games.
Things like this are the final transition into a service society, the slow and gradual abolishment of private property. If you sell something the only way you can have control is if they need to repair or buy another, under a rental you have far more power over the person renting.
This is the gradual enslavement of society. Things being taken away from you, only to be given back temporarily and if you follow the rules and obey your overlords.
The left wing of capitalism is globalist, and they support basically all the tenets of Communism (at least for the general public). The right wing of capitalism is controlled opposition.
Communism and to some extent liberalism and other "progressive" ideologies revolve around the denial of hierarchy and people being given what they had not earned.
The reason they think "Well if I was in charge I'd fix everything!" is also due to a naive understanding of power as well as a deep seated jealousy and envy of people who do have it.
People who want what they cannot reasonably have must gain it due to subversion and secretive tactics. This is the slow process of "equality" to stop giving power to people who can use it well, and instead give it to people who will misuse it.
Exactly. Every society has it's weakest points, and women can be a large one. This is why treating women exactly like men and expecting them to act contrary to their nature leads to many problems. If they under-perform you're not simply allowed to say that without facing backlash.
Much worse is the force that drives that wedge deeper into society in order to break up power and take it for itself, knowing full well the amount of suffering and destruction it can cause.
Women cannot be that ultimate cause, especially in a monogamous society. For humanity to exist it needs men and women, and either one needs to be suppressed or they work in tandem. If deep down men or women in general wanted the other utterly destroyed, it would have already happened by now and there would be no humans.
This is a leftist/commie meme about how corporations are only cynically supporting progressive movements in order to make more money. This isn't true, there are people within those companies actually pushing for these things despite the fact that they are very unpopular and making less money.
Women can act as good informants, and depending on intelligence, as spymasters. Who else is going to pay attention to every petty detail and not forget the slightest of insults but a woman. Just think of all the old women who looks out their windows and keeps tabs on every single neighbor out of neuroticism, but having actual authority and being trained for the job.