A disease so deadly, that people need to be bribed into taking the vaccine....
These are (probably) the same people that unironically argued in favor of illegal immigration by saying things like
Who will clean the toilets? Who will do the jobs that Americans won't do?
Putting aside the argument that Americans WOULD do those jobs for a living wage, that talking point (just like the ones about voting ID) highlight how they see the minority group they claim to advocate for, as inherently lesser.
Here's what I find especially interesting about the vaccine numbers, that give me hope.
The official data, as of the time I am writing this, is that about 32 percent of the US population is vaccinated according to NPR (https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/01/28/960901166/how-is-the-covid-19-vaccination-campaign-going-in-your-state)
It is already well documented that vaccine distributors are having trouble finding people that want to take the vaccine, even though around 68 percent of the population is still not vaccinated. This is encouraging since it suggests that many people, possibly even the majority, have not fallen for the vaccine hype and Covid scare-mongering.
Apparently they're in the mountains at 10,000 feet of elevation, and the pictures show sparse arid scrubland. They're going to bankrupt themselves on Uber eats, starve to death come winter, or become the Donner Party 2.0
Well people tend to put the beginning of the Zoomer generation somewhere in the late 90s- one good defining standard I heard was that if you're too young to remember 9/11 you are a zoomer.
Some people put it a bit earlier around 1995-1996 but I've heard convincing arguments that there's kind of a mini in between generation in that range that doesn't fit into either millennial or zoomers and has its own identity.
In any case I was born in early 2001, so definitely a zoomer regardless of one's definition.
And yes I agree with regard to the people staying in academia the longest being the most leftist. It's a chicken or egg situation as to whether they make academia more leftist by their presence or they stay in academia because it was already leftist to begin with.
Speaking as an older zoomer, it's extremely politically polarized. Especially among gender and racial lines.
Men in general trend right, women in general trend left. White zoomers tend to lean right, males overwhelmingly so, females around 50/50. Thing is, because of immigration (both legal and illegal) white zoomers aren't the majority in their age demographic.
Nonwhites trend more left overall, but that is largely depending on gender and the specific group. Cubans for instance trend right, as do native-born Hispanics. Asians trend left but that may change in the future with BLMs general hostility towards that group. Immigrants from India and the Middle East are mostly to the left as well.
Blacks are in a weird position where most of them vote left for handouts or because of perceived racism, while simultaneously being one of the most religious and socially conservative demographics overall. Seriously, ask an average black person their thoughts on LGBT in public, and leftists would be horrified.
I don't think this division is by accident. It's pretty clear and has already been discussed to death that the elites are creating demographic division through immigration and propaganda, to weaken the US.
Name yousef Nick Gurr. Or Feg-gut.
Healthcare plz
The people on .win are more "awake" about what's happening than your average irl conservative. Ancedotally speaking I still see a good number of thin blue line flags and I don't live in an especially conservative area.
But then again anti cop conservatives irl probably aren't rushing to advertise themselves, so they could be a higher proportion than meets the eye.
Police are not in themselves good or bad, they are simply enforcers of state authority.
I believe the end goal of the current anti-cop push, is to abolish the current system of local jurisdictions maintaining their own police departments, to implement a central federalized police department that is more directly under the government's control.
Both the left and the right have anti-cop elements that are being subverted to push the ultimate goal.
The end goal of the "Back the Blue" movement among the mainstream Right, is to build support for the coming Federal law enforcement agency that will be used to further control us. It was not long ago that people on the right (particularly the libertarians and Dixie-flag-flying rednecks) were generally anti-cop and anti-authority. The Dukes of Hazzard shows how common this sentiment was as recently as the 1970s and 1980s. It is only recently that nearly everyone on the right became "pro-cop", and this is not an accident.
On the left, the anti-policing movement was always more prevalent than on the right, and thus instead of trying to change their opinion with patriotic rhetoric, the left is being manipulated into pushing the abolishment of the current policing system in it's entirety.
As it stands right now, the police have considerable discretion in which laws they actually enforce, and there are numerous instances of laws being rejected by state congresses because the police said they wouldn't enforce them. The most recent example would be from Virginia in 2018 when they tried to pass some gun control bill and after sheriff's said they wouldn't enforce it, it was rejected.
Naturally, the endgame of the global elites relies on absolute control of every level of society. They cannot push the policies outlined in the Great Reset and Agenda 21, in the United States, if individual US Law enforcement agencies refuse to play along.
Hence, they demonize the current policing system by any means necessary, specifically by alleging that (despite the current systems decentralized nature) that all police agencies are inherently racist. They argue this even to the point of pushing made-up or exaggerated cases of race-based brutality. Simultaneously, they get the more "nationalist" right-wing types to defend law enforcement by any means necessary. The end goal is to make both sides open to the creation of a centralized law enforcement agency that is completely under the thumb and control of the Federal government.
It won't likely happen all at once, there will probably be a period of "two steps forward, one step back" to create the illusion of reform instead of replacement. But make no mistake, the end goal is federal cops under the complete control of whoever is in the White House and Congress.
They still don't, but you can't point that out anymore.
What, you're not 6'8 mega chad with powerlifter arms? Guess you're uncomfortable and need to become trans
CS Lewis had a great quote on that- pretty sure that's what you're referring to but just wanted to mention it.
Karl Marx married a noble, insulted Jews, niggers & half-breeds, disliked his female children, refused baths, kept a sex slave, refused child support
Like him or hate him, dude was based and gave zero fucks, lmfao
On a more serious note, Marx isn't getting cancelled for the obvious reason that many of the cancel culture people have a neutral or positive opinion of his ideology. If you've been following their behavior for the past few years and still expect them to have consistent standards, then I really don't know what else to say.
Alright, I'll take the bait.
That's stupid. If you accept the premise that all or most Africans are incompatible with society, (not necessarily true, but for the sake of this argument, I will) then the most humane thing would be voluntary relocation to Africa or some other place.
Keeping them as slaves is pointless in the modern age. Besides the economic uselessness in the age of automation, it just reignites racial resentment, which solves nothing in the long run, and it is unnecessarily cruel.
Nah, in my experience you can get away with saying almost anything here as long as you're careful about how you phrase it. Coming here and screaming "Sieg Heil" isn't going to fly, but making real arguments against mass immigration or against feminism is very commonplace here.
Basically, don't be a sperg.
who is "us"?
You know the saying, "never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake"?
Maybe we should just let them think knife fights are normal, and natural selection will take its course
Excellent response. Some of those points came to me as well, but not in such a detailed way, and you mentioned several arguments that never occurred to me
Ruqqus isn't as bad, depends on the community but in general its fairly uncensored. t's reddit but more unfiltered. Which is nice, don't get me wrong, but it still feels like "reddit culture". Some may like it, but I hate reddit culture. To be truthful I don't spend much time there anymore, as I prefer being here or on an imageboard.
And a NYT columnist according to the original article
Journalist types live in a bubble, that's no secret. Either that, or he's simping for BLM for the sake of improving his career prospects. People characterize journalists as knowing propagandists, which I am sure is the case for some of them. But many of them are unknowing propagandists, in other words they truly believe what they are saying.
I actually respect the knowing propagandists over the unknowing tools. At least they are smart enough to serve their own interests, the tools are feeding the lion until it gets big enough to consume them.
Saidit already took on tranny admins, so they were compromised anyway. With the exception of the .Win network it seems like that in general, imageboards are less cucked than reddit clones.
I'm not one to simp for billionaires, but I am glad that someone of his stature is openly speaking out.
And when you take into account the hundreds of millions (if not billions) of doses being manufactured, that money all adds up.
I personally think the population control theory is more likely, but your logic is retarded nonetheless.