Here's an example from the Washington Post, there's plenty of other sites saying the same thing if you care to look
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/09/07/jim-jordan-vaccine-unamerican-washington/
Now, to the point:
Smallpox vaccination in the 1700s was done by either giving the patient smallpox directly, or by giving them a weaker disease called cowpox.
As anyone who has taken basic biology knows, this was effective because when your immune system fights off a disease, it creates antibodies to prevent you from getting sick again. The process of getting a disease, fighting it off and retaining antibodies, is called "natural immunity".
If you got smallpox or cowpox and survived with antibodies, you were considered "vaccinated".
In the modern age, if you get Covid and survive with antibodies, you are not considered "vaccinated". You are still required to get one of the pharma companies' mRNA vaccines.
This makes no sense especially when you consider that smallpox was much deadlier than Covid.
The fact that the shills ignore natural immunity for Covid, while using a story about natural immunity for Smallpox to bolster their arguments for mandatory mRNA Covid vaccines, puts me at a loss.
It's so blatantly hypocritical that it would be funny if it wasn't so stupid.
So first of all, they claim the justification for these new branch offices is to "help investigate threats against lawmakers". Which, without any elaboration on their part, can be interpreted as narrowly or broadly as they wish.
U.S. Capitol Police said because the majority of threats come from Florida and California, they decided to open two field offices: one in Tampa, and one in San Francisco.
The field officers are a first for the agency and may play a role in identifying future threats.
The spokesperson said the first field offices will be located in the Tampa and San Francisco areas, and that more locations are planned in the future.
So the federal government is using the supposed threat of terrorism, as an excuse to expand its own reach and powers.....gee where have we seen that before?
I've commented several times my view that the intent of the "defund the police" movement is to secure support for "police reform" that would allow for a federal law enforcement agency. But, this new justification is a lot simpler and makes even more sense.
They've already gone overboard with trying to make the Capitol Riot out to be the worst thing since 9/11 and Pearl Harbor. They keep calling it 1/6, they have journalists and politicians crying about the impact and trauma, and the rioters themselves have been treated as domestic terrorists and imprisoned for months without bail or counsel.
So of course they would use the Capitol Riot as a justification to expand the reach of law enforcement, just as they did with the Patriot Act after 9/11, and with the various surveillance laws passed after Pearl Harbor.
Here's some links for anyone that wants to do some reading
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/january-6-capitol-riot-capitol-police-field-offices-florida-california/
Noticed that vaccines have been brought up in quite a few comment sections, even in posts that are only tangentially related, but that there wasn't a post specifically about the intent behind the vaccines.
So anyone with theories or thoughts related to the vaccine and the push for it, this is your discussion thread.
My personal thoughts: the ultimate intent is a combination of population control, and consolidation of power, for 3 reasons:
- most developed nations, both west and east, are facing an imminent unbalance in age demographics because the baby boomers are getting to the age where they already have (or are about to) retire en masse. This will put massive pressure on government programs, with too many takers and not enough working taxpayers. So they want the old people to die before this happens.
(As an aside, this was arguably the main reason why they recently tried to push mass migration, to get more taxpayers. But we all know how that went)
-
I've seen people argue (not unreasonably) along the lines of "why would they kill the most obedient ones?" Because right now, the dissidents are protected from the elite, by safety in numbers. They (we?) Can easily blend into a crowd to hide. But what happens if the elite kill the obedient, and there is no crowd left to hide in? They will much more easily be able to control people, when there are fewer people.
-
people behind vaccine development/distribution like Gates and the WEF, have openly stated population reduction to be a goal of theirs for various reasons.
That's the gist of my thoughts. Any other opinions are welcome
We keep posting the same articles over and over about how the left does something stupid/racist/hypocritical to advance its agenda.
It's so damn obvious that I can read the article and predict all the responses before even entering the comment section.
Yeah, the 2020 election was most likely rigged. Yeah, Antifa/BLM gets away with months of terrorism while people defending themselves (Rittenhouse) get shit on for existing. Yeah, Covid is blown way out of proportion. Yeah, the vaccines are at best a money making ploy, at worst literal population control. Yes, western nations are deliberately being subverted and destroyed with mass immigration. Yes, the schools and the media have largely been taken over by leftist ideologues. Yes, man hating feminists are intentionally pushing policies to make it easy to destroy men with simple accusations. Yes, powerful groups of elites are rewriting history to their own benefit.
It's so damned obvious to anyone paying attention that its almost redundant to keep talking about this.
I am not down playing any of this or saying it should be ignored. What I am saying is that we keep repeating this over and over and nothing is coming from it.
What the hell are we supposed to do?
Most mainstream networks haven't mentioned this as far as I can see. But the gist of it is that Maricopa County, Arizona was one of the places with suspicious activity surrounding the counting and handling of ballots.
As we speak, a new "forensic audit" is taking place to see exactly the extent of the fraud, if any. Democrats attempted to stop the audit multiple times, but were not succesful. Interestingly, many of the ballots in question (that had previously been put into storage) were discovered shredded, in plastic bags. Who did this is not known, (but we can certainly guess.....) My understanding is that the audit team will try to piece together the scraps to see the destroyed ballots, and that there are still intact ballots to examine.
Assuming this audit turns up actual evidence, does anyone think this will change anything?
I doubt the election results will be overturned over one state but this may open the door to further investigations.
inb4 copium
inb4 two more weeks
This is a live stream of the audit https://azaudit.org/
If you have 20 minutes to spare, this is a video describing the technology used to identify fraudulent ballots, from a man who designed part of the system. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgeqGmvQXKs
What I find very interesting is the reaction of the leftists and the media. The usual blue checkmark retards on twitter are talking about how this is a "dangerous attempt to overturn democracy" and a "second insurrrection". Usual nonsense. But the destruction of ballots and multiole attempts to stop the audits do suggest that there is something they are trying to hide. And the media's silence on this new development is deafening.
This is a paper written by two European scientists, an Englishman and a German, addressed to several government agencies responsible for vaccine distribution in both Europe and the USA, asking them to reconsider distributing the Pfizer vaccine. The whole thing is a worthwhile read if you don't mind translating scientific jargon, it covers multiple topics including the problems with the vaccine trials themselves, as well as inaccurate methods used for Covid testing, but this is the part that specifically caught my eye
Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 .....
...... which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.
There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile (emphasis mine)
Now, knowing this, and knowing that
-
individuals behind these mRNA vaccines (like Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab for instance), have for years spoken about the need for population control
-
the vaccine companies are, by law, totally immune to any liablity or damage caused by their products
Does anyone think this is a coincidence?
