Tone travels poorly over text.
We can run everything on wind and solar
You don't get it. They do believe the science. The part that you're not getting is that the scientists are the science, not the practice.
Prior studies have already shown that there is a far greater sentencing disparity on the basis of sex than that of race, to the point that on average a white man will receive a longer sentence than a black woman for the same crime and when taking priors into consideration.
So even when there are racial disparities, something which is meant to be an example of racism against racial minorities, most people ignore or outright excuse sex disparities despite the far greater divide there is in said disparity. Some will even suggest that it's actually sexism against women that men receive harsher punishment than women, which is just a testament to how ingrained such dogma really is.
God, I wish they were a form of vigilante justice. The only thing stopping people from hunting actual, undeniable criminals (murderers, rapists, pedophiles, etc) for sport is the state.
That's a blast from the past. I thought the name sounded familiar.
You'd think they'd learn at some point that they're not going to get these gotcha moments. Sure, they had them in years gone past, and still occasionally get them with some establishment Republicans (re: part of the one party system), but the new generation of Republicans are either smarter like Vivek, or they know to simply avoid these stupid gotcha attempts since it gets them so very little.
I'm done supporting any politician these days. The system cannot be reformed. But only a retard could look at the current state of affairs and not see the state of the media at large, and how much BETTER the right is at handling a hostile "host". Shocking how decades of such treatment resulted in people being better attuned to how to defend themselves against such tactics. Inversely, the left are just incapable of dealing with even mild disagreement, and resort to simply shutting it all down. If they can't win the fight, they'll just try to subvert elsewhere to get them taken down. Because that's what statists and leftists do: they subvert.
Seems awfully weird that you whine like a girl that you don't get taken seriously and then double down to ensure you don't get taken seriously.
Your treatment around here is entirely caused by your own antagonisms. Maybe if you could behave like a normal person, people wouldn't treat you like this.
In the two months you've been here, you have had exactly 1 post gain any sort of traction. You treat this place as a personal blog as you continue down your main character syndrome. You are universally disliked here.
Why would anyone need such propaganda? Answer is obvious.
As per usual, what business is it of the state as to how a private company conducts their business?
You will not vote out this kind of over-reach. This over-reach will not be repealed. Voooooting harder will not change this. The state is not your friend, and never will be your friend.
Don't you bitch that you don't get taken seriously around here?
If that's the case, why are these posts made to be inflammatory to try and phish for angry responses you can laugh about on other subs? Seems like the actions of someone explicitly looking to NOT engage with others, and only try to troll. People who earnestly try to engage don't behave like that.
You know what the funniest thing about the whole AI translations thing really is? AI isn't fool-proof. It's gonna make mistakes every now and then. And a localization company could make BANK by involving AI for the bulk of their work and using current localizers as essentially editors to make sure it works. And these freaks would still be able to control the industry.
But they're literally too stupid for it. They can't see how easy it would be to come out on top. And I couldn't be happier for it.
The meme isn't even about white replacement. Which makes their response awfully suspicious to state when not even prompted. Almost like it's a guilty conscience.
It's not thousands, and after a quick look the image from OP is one of the worse ones, but there are plenty of quote retweets of that specific tweet that are along the same line.
So yeah, OP is doing some clickbait/hyperbole, but that's just on this one tweet as well. There are thousands of tweets like this all the time across a variety of tweets, and none of them get any sort of treatment like other posts do. But nothing is new there.
Firstly, 29 dates in a year. I haven't dated 29 different people in my whole-ass life, you slut.
I'm gonna play devil's advocate here (though she probably doesn't deserve it) and suggest that maybe she's including the dates that lasted a single date (number 19 seems to be like this) while also including longer term relationships (like number 20), which are two very different things. Single dates are opportunities to try and find people, to give them an initial chance to see if the chance at a relationship is worth pursuing.
That said, 29 dates in a single year is more than 1 every fortnight. And I'd say that 19 of these are almost definitely single dates, so assuming that the remaining 10 of those are at least 3 dates long, she'd have a very busy schedule of dating if she also works a standard full-time job (meaning dating is pretty much weekend exclusive). But I doubt that's the case, so she's bringing fuck all to the dating scene while having higher standards than she's expecting the men to have for her, and probably lining up dates multiple days in a row. Zero surprises there.
Oh, also, I love when leftist women like this bitch and moan about "muh mental issues" when dating, when they're supposed to be the most tolerant and loving bunch out there. I don't mind not wanting to date someone with mental health issues, but they're always so willing to try and spread muh awareness and care up until it might effect themselves. Then it's all about getting it as far away from them as they possibly can. Which isn't surprising, that's the case for most leftists. Just look at them regarding immigration.
It truly is amazing how so many men will openly and eagerly state that this is not attractive, and these dumbasses simply cannot comprehend that it's the truth. They truly believe that men as a whole are lying, and then when men yet again tell them they don't find this attractive, they get mad and angry at men for...... well, who the fuck knows what the supposed reason is. The actual reason is that they get mad at men to avoid coming to terms with the reality that they did it to themselves of their own free will under a delusion that they know what men want when they actively dismiss what men explicitly say.
The complete reliance people have on others controlling their experiences has been nothing but a cancer.
And if anyone needs an example of this in the worst extreme, look no further than online gaming now compared to 10+ years ago, primarily the gaming that was on PC at that. Look at how what was once dominated with private servers where every group could have their own corner has now been eradicated into an unironically toxic shithole of mixed groups.
Many here would say they hate those that are SocJus inclined, but the issue would be mitigated if they simply stayed in their little corners, and other groups in there. Let skinheads and feminists have their own servers, but don't pretend like they're going to get along via public servers. This is the issue. And then instead of self-moderation (eg, you the end user curating your own life choices including where you spend your time), people are expected to rely on some central authority, namely the developers/publishers, and then wonder why it all ends up so shit.
This isn't limited to the online either. People need to stop looking to rely on others to tell them how to conduct their lives. To stop looking for people to be banned, excluded or punished simply because it doesn't align with them. Whether it's something as relatively small as gaming to something as major as relying on ever growing government, society at large needs to become a lot more independent about how they conduct themselves.
People who want something "let go" typically only want such things because to remember it would be to hold them accountable in some way.
Best case scenario is that this loser wants it "let go" so he can forget his complicity with authoritarian measures. Worst case, he was actively on the side of authoritarian measures, still is, and fears if people are actually held accountable.
EDIT: Openly calls himself a cultural marxist, it's definitely the latter in some form.
You should also consider the change in standards. Do you think the average first home buyer in the 60s was looking for a house with excess rooms? Most were shitty things with maybe 5 rooms (main bedroom, kitchen, bathroom, dining and either a lounge/living area or a second bedroom for kids). Contrast with today and the standard seems to be 3 bedroom minimum with two living spaces, each with their own TV. Which also applies to other aspects like technological standards, including things like AC, heating or general appliances.
The reality is that the standards of the footprint of a home has increased over the years, as has the standards of what is included in a home. This has priced more and more people out of the market as they refuse to lower their standards, because let's be real: these freaks aren't even remotely ready to lower their lives to the standards of the 60s, but they want 60s prices.
Never let them get away with double standards. They want the prices of back then, they have to live like back then, and maybe it might be feasible for their min wage mooching asses.
Rather than "how dare someone disagree with me on Trump?"
Do you think that's what I said, even a little? You really gonna be THAT disingenuous? Because being that kind of disingenuous would really undermine your entire point.
Which gave me the impression that Liana was always controlled opposition, or at least reluctant to attack her fellow female feminists.
That wasn't it. It's that Sarkeesian was Liana's competition. Liana was competing for an audience, and Liana was happy to align herself with another audience where she might be able to gain even a modicum of traction for her views. And frankly, it somewhat worked. A lot of early GG people, especially outside of the KiA2 splinter, are still very leftist in nature. She found an audience and many fell for it. Same with CHS. They were all still pushing from the same book. It was just about the amount of push. While Sarkeesian was trying to use wrecking balls, Liana and CHS were using hand hammers. By comparison, they're tame, but they're still after the same goal at the end of the day. They're still playing from the same SocJus playbook.
Cool story, she's still just another Anita Sarkeesian, but with an ounce more tact. She's still pushing the same tired topics. She's still a feminist. She's still a grifter. She was less "neutral" and more "tactful", trying to lure flies with honey rather than turds.
Remember, going through official channels of bureaucracy is clearly a sign of being an authoritarian!
Geez, I'm not the biggest fan of Trump, but the vast majority of criticism is just utterly fucking unhinged. I'm glad OP is intent on documenting GG, but I couldn't imagine a more "head in sand" response than what he gave. Literally repeating the establishment mantra about Trump. Utterly insane.
All unions are sellouts, and has been for ever. Unions exist solely to make jobs for the useless and scam money from their members.
There's a reason so many unions fight to make it mandatory to be a part of the union, or tie their wages one level so that wage negotiations are collective rather than based on personal performance.
But other than that, unions are to thank for the entire safety industry, and industry that exists NOT to keep workers safe, but to protect companies by blaming the workers so long as the company does the bare minimum.
Unions exist to EXPLOIT the worker. No exceptions.