3
APDSmith 3 points ago +3 / -0

OK, I can see a block of text that looks like a Wiki quote. Twice. Is that the thing you're talking about?

Couldn't see the Nazi thing.

Do you have a specific link, or am I doing all the work here? Are we doing the SJW thing and insisting I educate myself?

3
APDSmith 3 points ago +6 / -3

It's more "I've not yet seen how Jester is breaking the rules, whereas Azure not only broke the rules, but then instead decided that the rules were the problem."

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's just an efficiency thing. If you intend to tear down the US and replace it with a glorious socialist state because the Republic of the United States isn't helping african americans rise up from poverty, it's much more efficient if you keep them in poverty until your work is done.

8
APDSmith 8 points ago +8 / -0

Don't forget the big helping hand that politically-based decisions to prosecute - or not - can lend to the decision-making process.

What does it matter if a multinational is acting illegally if the state refuses to hold them to account?

8
APDSmith 8 points ago +8 / -0

But I actually read from informative sources and on-the-street-level journalism, instead of from big propaganda.

They're still focused on how the evil SUV decided to claim those lives, are they not?

5
APDSmith 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've not particularly been around the past couple of days, do you have a link or an archive?

3
APDSmith 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who's ready for the media to pivot to begging men to have kids?

Why would they do that when, for a globalist, the answer is simply to import a new population to replace the one that is dying out?

With the added bonus of this new population they're importing being considerably more amenable to the kind of feudalism that our lords and masters wish to return to.

6
APDSmith 6 points ago +7 / -1

Azure got banned several times

2
APDSmith 2 points ago +4 / -2

I mean, as far as I can see, it's a fairly simple "break the rules, show no indication of holding to the rules, cop a ban" ... if you can show Jester doing the same, I'll mention it where I can...

It's just that the rule Azure didn't like was the one asking him not to try and start a race war.

2
APDSmith 2 points ago +2 / -0

OK. I haven't see any Rule 3 stuff for Jester, do we have archives, images, carrier pigeon ... ?

You know, the ol' "trust but verify" thing we're so fond of.

Not disregarding the rest of that, just trying to take it one thing at a time.

19
APDSmith 19 points ago +25 / -6

Which rule, then, has Jester broken?

Honestly, this sounds like a tit-for-tat thing with Azure getting banned. Do you think that's an edifying spectacle or casts you in a good light?

16
APDSmith 16 points ago +16 / -0

Christianity has always been a very inclusive religion, down to co-opting the various pagan festivals under the Christian banner. Perhaps this is just the church fulfilling it's historic role of moulding itself to the shifting ecclesiastical landscape?

1
APDSmith 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup NGOs, like the old quangos, are a dream for an unaccountable civil servant with an agenda to push.

No oversight, no accountability and yet still wielding governmental power. It's no wonder they're being pushed everywhere, what fascist could dream of such a thing being accepted so quietly and meekly by the populace?

9
APDSmith 9 points ago +9 / -0

Now that's a pandemic.

Don't you worry, I'm quite sure Fauci's working to produce a proper pandemic that will actually justify suspending all civil liberties everywhere.

3
APDSmith 3 points ago +4 / -1

Well, whether or not Marx was, there's something off with the letter. Sent in 1928 to a guy who died in ... 1883.

2
APDSmith 2 points ago +4 / -2

Wel, I don't know it's him, but you tell me ... is Azure the kind of person to take a hint as subtle as multiple bans when it comes to a matter as important as starting his race war?

3
APDSmith 3 points ago +4 / -1

... Azure, is that you?

10
APDSmith 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, but they can just decline to prosecute if that happens. Remember Ayn Rand - these people certainly do:

The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.

That's their theory of government - everybody is a criminal, and the government picks and chooses which criminals it punishes and which it decorates.

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder, what is the rational response to your own country imprisoning fully a third of it's population?

Don't worry, though, it's only 14 days to flatten the curve 20 days!

3
APDSmith 3 points ago +3 / -0

Honestly, it's getting very tempting to just start spinning ludicrous bullshit to see what they'll pick up on - "Rittenhouse not only executed three black men, he carved off their ears as trophies" proceeds to insert picture from Universal Soldier

10
APDSmith 10 points ago +10 / -0

Jacob Blake, who I'm sure will be a little put off by the current talking point that he was killed by the police.

Unless the Clintons are telegraphing the hits now, just to watch their targets squirm?

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder if all this "crossing state lines" bullshit is intended to give the FBI the fig leaf necessary to go full stasi on Rittenhouse.

23
APDSmith 23 points ago +23 / -0

Ha, you're assuming Biden makes it off the operating table alive.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›