I think he is complaining about me proving that Nazis would not prosecute pedos and rapists if they were good members of the party. It is a summary of most of the content, including the page numbers mentioning the names and examples of nazi soldiers and politicians who raped kids.
It also showed that if the girl was not of the correct race or her parents were problematic, her words were discarded.
Plus their consent age being 14, they would also ignore the evidence if the judge thought the girl looked older.
I've not particularly been around the past couple of days, do you have a link or an archive?
It's in his post history?
OK, I can see a block of text that looks like a Wiki quote. Twice. Is that the thing you're talking about?
Couldn't see the Nazi thing.
Do you have a specific link, or am I doing all the work here? Are we doing the SJW thing and insisting I educate myself?
Pretty much yeah. There's a good reason most everyone on this board hates him, and I don't bother archiving his posts, he's not worth the effort.
I think he is complaining about me proving that Nazis would not prosecute pedos and rapists if they were good members of the party. It is a summary of most of the content, including the page numbers mentioning the names and examples of nazi soldiers and politicians who raped kids.
It also showed that if the girl was not of the correct race or her parents were problematic, her words were discarded.
Plus their consent age being 14, they would also ignore the evidence if the judge thought the girl looked older.