Rule 3 mostly, but you can also include 12, 16, 15, and 11. He should have been banned in the first month of .win's existence as all he did was shill his youtube channel.
Yup. I asked why he wasn't booted for constantly posting his own shit content, which is blatant self-promotion, and I was told that we need to "encourage creators" or some such idiocy.
Jester is here for two reasons: to shill his comically retarded YouTube and to entrap and spam report anyone who even mentions Jewish behavior. He's a gigantic negative for this community.
But unlike jester, I don't advocate for censorship.
I don't advocate censorship, but I even more advocate specific exceptions for the golden karmic rule of doing unto others as they themselves would do. Aka the "you get what you fucking deserve" rule.
I think he is complaining about me proving that Nazis would not prosecute pedos and rapists if they were good members of the party. It is a summary of most of the content, including the page numbers mentioning the names and examples of nazi soldiers and politicians who raped kids.
It also showed that if the girl was not of the correct race or her parents were problematic, her words were discarded.
Plus their consent age being 14, they would also ignore the evidence if the judge thought the girl looked older.
Azureace might tend to schizo post a lot, but he at least started good discussion threads that got large engagement.
What does DrJester add to the community? All he ever does is shill his videos, insult the Irish, and spam nonsensical garbage against any post he perceives as attacking the tribe.
It's more "I've not yet seen how Jester is breaking the rules, whereas Azure not only broke the rules, but then instead decided that the rules were the problem."
I mean, as far as I can see, it's a fairly simple "break the rules, show no indication of holding to the rules, cop a ban" ... if you can show Jester doing the same, I'll mention it where I can...
It's just that the rule Azure didn't like was the one asking him not to try and start a race war.
I must have seen 5-6 variations of that user name by now. And those are just the accounts named "Azure", who knows how many other retarded handshake posts he's penned.
Which rule, then, has Jester broken?
Honestly, this sounds like a tit-for-tat thing with Azure getting banned. Do you think that's an edifying spectacle or casts you in a good light?
Rule 3 mostly, but you can also include 12, 16, 15, and 11. He should have been banned in the first month of .win's existence as all he did was shill his youtube channel.
Yup. I asked why he wasn't booted for constantly posting his own shit content, which is blatant self-promotion, and I was told that we need to "encourage creators" or some such idiocy.
Jester is here for two reasons: to shill his comically retarded YouTube and to entrap and spam report anyone who even mentions Jewish behavior. He's a gigantic negative for this community.
But unlike jester, I don't advocate for censorship.
But I do advocate for censorship, especially of people like him.
aka gatekeep or be gatekept
I don't advocate censorship, but I even more advocate specific exceptions for the golden karmic rule of doing unto others as they themselves would do. Aka the "you get what you fucking deserve" rule.
OK. I haven't see any Rule 3 stuff for Jester, do we have archives, images, carrier pigeon ... ?
You know, the ol' "trust but verify" thing we're so fond of.
Not disregarding the rest of that, just trying to take it one thing at a time.
Just in the last day he's been spamming some weird pedo fantasy copypasta while ranting about imaginary Nazis, so I'd say Rules 5 and 6.
I've not particularly been around the past couple of days, do you have a link or an archive?
It's in his post history?
OK, I can see a block of text that looks like a Wiki quote. Twice. Is that the thing you're talking about?
Couldn't see the Nazi thing.
Do you have a specific link, or am I doing all the work here? Are we doing the SJW thing and insisting I educate myself?
I think he is complaining about me proving that Nazis would not prosecute pedos and rapists if they were good members of the party. It is a summary of most of the content, including the page numbers mentioning the names and examples of nazi soldiers and politicians who raped kids.
It also showed that if the girl was not of the correct race or her parents were problematic, her words were discarded.
Plus their consent age being 14, they would also ignore the evidence if the judge thought the girl looked older.
wait, azure got banned?
He and jester both shit up the board with their posts and squabbles, but surprise surprise - the "anti-semite" got the hammer.
Azureace might tend to schizo post a lot, but he at least started good discussion threads that got large engagement.
What does DrJester add to the community? All he ever does is shill his videos, insult the Irish, and spam nonsensical garbage against any post he perceives as attacking the tribe.
It's more "I've not yet seen how Jester is breaking the rules, whereas Azure not only broke the rules, but then instead decided that the rules were the problem."
I mean, as far as I can see, it's a fairly simple "break the rules, show no indication of holding to the rules, cop a ban" ... if you can show Jester doing the same, I'll mention it where I can...
It's just that the rule Azure didn't like was the one asking him not to try and start a race war.
Azure got banned several times
I must have seen 5-6 variations of that user name by now. And those are just the accounts named "Azure", who knows how many other retarded handshake posts he's penned.