9
APDSmith 9 points ago +9 / -0

As far as I am aware, nobody ever successfully doxed Mombot, although a few SJWs tried and failed.

Writeup of "ZachAttack" here: https://medium.com/@mombot/zachattack-how-i-tricked-anti-harassment-advocates-into-doxing-me-4d9f055e2738

5
APDSmith 5 points ago +5 / -0

Strictly speaking it was 2.37% if you included Jack, who left. The remainder didn't manage a whole percent between the lot of them, iirc.

9
APDSmith 9 points ago +9 / -0

Cash or anything else

Again, it's the voucher nature of the stuff. It can just quietly decline to be used for purchase of physical cash, or of fixed assets, or anything that lets you escape this combined vouchers-and-social-credit system that's being built.

I imagine any possibility of currency trading goes out the window as well, for the same reason: You're on ProleBucks™, now go spend what meagre money we've graciously decided to give you on an insect burger, pleb!

23
APDSmith 23 points ago +23 / -0

The key point about digital currencies, from what I can tell, is that the organisation issuing the digital currency still gets to control what it is used for, even after it's issued.

It's less "cash" and more "food vouchers". If your employer decides that your wages aren't to be spent on anything irresponsible like stocks and shares, with digital currencies they can enforce this.

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nope. Run 'em through the legal system like the common criminals that they are.

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's their ideal form of government. One giant, authoritarian machine, that they get to control.

Haven't you noticed that whenever you try and convince a population to go socialist it never quite works?

About the only "successful" (if it's not obscene to use that phrase in this context) implementations of socialism have been when a very small group of people are convinced to impose it upon the rest of their population.

4
APDSmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

This bunch fundamentally believe that as a mere citizen you are simply too stupid to act in your own best interests and that, because of this, you must surrender your decision making capabilities to the state or it's agents. Willingly or not.

At it's core, it's an argument from authority.

8
APDSmith 8 points ago +8 / -0

If I was LGBT I would not be terribly happy about the way that lefties keep linking paedophilia and LGBT.

I mean, if you're just a regular gay guy and these geniuses keep insisting that paedophilia is fine because gay ... do you not find it concerning that the state is saying that yes, the gays are coming for your children - but the state is just fine with that?

Not least if you have to interact with the parents of any children.

11
APDSmith 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm not sure that the likes of Google, Amazon and Apple even recognise allies or simply view them as more easily-exploited resources.

12
APDSmith 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's a curious position to take, isn't it?

CCA is the true Black Lives Matter, not this group called Black Lives Matter, the one that's run by the movement's founders.

Cool story, bro...

37
APDSmith 37 points ago +37 / -0

If you're of a particular bent the purpose of mass media is to bend entire populations to your will, it's an almost Soviet attitude towards it.

Can they please just make sci-fi/fantasy at least mostly about sci-fi/fantasy?

They already can. But they won't. They're campaigning to make USD useless anyway, what possible concern could these people have for losses?

9
APDSmith 9 points ago +9 / -0

True, he was only ever a talented amateur ... he did quite well, given what was arrayed against him, though, didn't he?

19
APDSmith 19 points ago +19 / -0

I suspect that's the point of it. Give an interval that can sound reasonable while actually doing everything you can to prevent somebody making use of it.

It's not any shadier than anything else Lorenz has done, is it?

14
APDSmith 14 points ago +14 / -0

Women tend to work much more by establishing a consensus and then handing off enforcement of that consensus to men - at least at the physical level.

Free speech is very counterproductive if that is your aim.

9
APDSmith 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's the usual supremacist's trick:

My group doesn't have to deal with any of our problems until after your group has dealt with all of yours.

8
APDSmith 8 points ago +8 / -0

This version of rebranding starts and ends with denigrating your existing audience to gain favour with your hoped-for new audience.

11
APDSmith 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's difficult, though, because you have an entire state apparatus telling them that they personally have been rendered helpless by whitey, but it's OK, the government will fix it for them.

It's deliberately a seductive, almost anesthetic message.

16
APDSmith 16 points ago +16 / -0

sacrificed our elders for the sake of freedom

This is the thing that gets me.

Did they ask those elders if they were okay with everybody's freedoms being revoked in their name? Maybe I missed it because I'm British, but I'm fairly sure that nobody over here actually asked those elderly we're protecting if that's what they wanted. Speaking to my mum, it certainly isn't what she would have chosen if anybody bothered to ask her, but they didn't, such was their haste to imprison the entire country.

11
APDSmith 11 points ago +11 / -0

Helping struggling maths students

Ahh, but they are - by ushering in the glorious revolution, that will fix everything!

You do believe in the revolution, don't you, comrade?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›