Yes, but they do this particular bit of hypocrisy so often they have they own mantra for it:
"It's not politics, it's human rights!"
(And yet, strangely, those rights advocates never even breathe a word in favour of the 2nd...)
... I'm surprised Patagonia's lawyers signed off on that.
Could that not easily be construed as Patagonia financing criminal action, at least to the extent for private parties to haul Patagonia into court and sue them for damages inflicted by their employees?
. Coney Barrett is a woman, retard.
For people like this, "Woman" is a political party - one that Coney Barrett is not welcome in.
Honestly, I would have expected you to have more sympathy for that viewpoint, given how close it is to your own, Imp...
I'm speaking in a monolith
This is your wife, this is your sister, this is your friend, this is your girlfriend, this is the mother of your children
Funny, isn't it, that all of these people who appoint themselves to right to speak for all women everywhere always find that all women everywhere always seem to want to do what they find politically expedient.
Were women actually a monolith the US Supreme Court would not have needed to act as an additional part of Congress and start legislating from the bench, because the matter would have been settled at state level for some time already.
Doesn't account for when you have to adjust rates to handle different economic cycles.
Who has to adjust which rates?
If we're talking interest rates, that would be something each bank would have to assess for themselves, taking into account that bank's circumstances. Not sure what other rates you'd be talking about...
You guys have only had a Federal Reserve since 1913.
Before that you had individual banks exposing themselves and collapsing - since then, the Fed has worked to broaden the risk so that when one goes, everybody goes.
I'm not sure that's a better system, personally.
It appears to be the antithesis of making the component parts of your financial system small enough that the failure of any individual one can be tolerated. Since 1913, the US seems to have been diligently working towards a system where the taxpayer - being the only entity in this entire diagram that's allowed to be landed with the bill - is regularly shafted as ever-more parts of the system become "too big to fail"
Yeah, this is something I've noticed myself.
British elites - and American, too, for that matter - seem to view the countries they are meant to benefit as some kind of hostile conquest that they are present in merely to strip the resources from before they can evacuate.
But the passport and the birth of place cannot be changed
Well, we only got to the third sentence before we got to our first factual error.
Want to change your passport? Emigrate to a different country. People do it all the time.
The rest of it is just defining a new untermensch class based off wealth, by the looks of it. Not interesting.
That's what it's about — making amends.
So the Biden administration's policy is that you are all sinners and must be made to pay?
I mean, OK, but I'm fairly surely "crazed serial killer" talking points is not a great way to get elected...
Yeah, one of the things that rarely gets mentioned about Kent State was that the National Guard troopers were jumpy as fuck because those protesters were trying to burn their barracks down, and hadn't shown a great deal of concern about anybody who might be in the barracks at the time!