2
5Cats 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right. The "gay beer" company is choosing government positions now? How does that make any sense?
Oh! "Liberal Logic(tm)" at its finest!

2
5Cats 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right, but aside from laser removal (which, iirc, still leaves scars) some gangs have a 'rule' where members who leave can essentially have their ID tats "X'd out" like the red slash in a circle.
Now, do active members follow this? Or will they still punish anyone they catch? IDK, I just saw an article on some (older) South American gang members who'd fled their country and left the gang behind. Getting their Tats "adjusted" was very important to them.

It is supposed to be for life, I agree! But people change and no "leader" wants to be trapped by his own rules.

4
5Cats 4 points ago +4 / -0

In theory? You can get tattoos to cover over your gang tattoos that indicate you've quit the gang? Any gang has to have a legitimate way to quit, eh? Or else the leaders themselves are trapped in it, even when they want to retire with their millions of $$$ and large families. (Their families are in constant danger. Both from other gangs in from inside too)

But he's still doing crimes in the USA? So screw him & throw him out for good. Tats or no tats, he's still a gang-banger.

2
5Cats 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this the "If you repent of your sins, you get into heaven no matter what" idea? Which is probably nonsense. He (Francis) seems to think evil people just vanish, which is worse than Hell, actually.

There was (allegedly) some Bishop or something who believed in the deathbed confession. He made it his life's work to commit SINS! ALL the sins! Ghastly stuff, actually. & chronicled each one in some sort of diary. On his deathbed he confessed to and repented to his sins, 4-5 volumes of them, and thus was guaranteed entry to heaven 🙄 maybe.
I don't think God is that stupid, but who knows, eh?

8
5Cats 8 points ago +8 / -0

Marshall McLuhan was right yet again! A thing becomes its opposite over time. The internet once was the ultimate communication tool. Now nothing you see on it can be believed. They can control what you say and who you can talk to. :<

3
5Cats 3 points ago +3 / -0

We live stream it! (Without revealing various "secrets" of course) and the whole world can watch her fail spectacularly.

1
5Cats 1 point ago +1 / -0

He was a Liberal back when Liberals still had some values. He said (decades later) he honestly believed the Chiefs wanted to help their own people, but they wanted the opposite. Suffering and endless graft.
So he gave up. Essentially nothing has changed since then, regardless of "changes" in governments.

3
5Cats 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, I'd let her try. Give her EXACTLY the same routine & treatment as EVERY male gets. See her wash out on day 3.
And if she can do it? Makes the grade, does the job? Well that's 1 more fine trooper!

The one issue is, she'd likely be knocking out a perfectly good male applicant who would have 10X more chance of success. Solution? In a "class of 30" add her as #31 & everyone wins?

2
5Cats 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey! It's only 97% are lies! 2% are hard to say, and 1% are true... +/- 3% accuracy 🤔
Ok, never mind :>

4
5Cats 4 points ago +4 / -0

My newlywed cousin and her husband spent 2 years backpacking in New Zealand for their honeymoon. They planned for 1 year, but it was too much fun!

This was back in the 80's, and yes they had ALL their permits and paperwork in order. They'd work odd jobs, wash dishes, shovel dirt, you name it. Sometimes trade work for lodgings & so forth.
She went on to be an ER doctor back in Canada... he raised the kids :>

3
5Cats 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like akira said above: ape behaviour.
I specify: chimpanzees. Brutal, ugly & stupid little shits.
Funny how much the left loves them, and bonobos (eew!), but each male in the Chimp troop MUST dominate every female, including the "alpha female" (who is in fact whoever the alpha male prefers most) or else will be driven away.

3
5Cats 3 points ago +3 / -0

ape hierarchy.

THAT IS IT! I mean really, chimpanzee tribal behaviour. You bluff & bluster non-stop, but when it's time for actual fighting? You take no risks & sneak attack from behind without warning is the #1 tactic. Do some actual, physical damage then jump away and scream a lot, before he can hit you back.
Remember: a single bite or scratch can get infected and kill you. Those who take risks are quickly removed.

6
5Cats 6 points ago +6 / -0

At least 2 African Cardinals (Black as the Ace of Spades they are!) are actual Catholics & hard-core traditionalists. Either would be far better than Francis was...

2
5Cats 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is all over X, Vance "gave Francis the 'evil eye' and killed him." IDK about everywhere else but I presume they'll be screaming about it for weeks.

2
5Cats 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup. Next do it for "Indian Reservations" especially in Canada.

In ~1970 a future PM was tasked with resolving outstanding disputes with Native Tribes. All of them. Effectively ending the "Indian Act" and would dismantle the "Department of Indian Affairs" too. For 6+ months he bashed his head against the brick wall of entrenched bureaucrats and corruption. He finally gave up when he asked the head of the "Council Of Chiefs" (I paraphrase of course)

"WHY don't you want payment for the past harms? Why won't you help your people today?"
"Because we want payment for future harm. We don't know how much suffering there will be!"
In other words: let the people suffer, deliberately, for 50+ more years while milking (bleeding!) the system for all it's worth. 😡

In Canada, the Natives consider the "Treaties" to be sacred, untouchable. But they also welcome changes that benefit themselves! Rip them all up, no more multiple-tiers of citizens.

4
5Cats 4 points ago +4 / -0

Reparations? Ah yes!
The Federal Government confiscated property (as was the law pre-Civil War) without ANY compensation.
You know who is owed "reparations"? 🙄 Former slave owners.

Just my 2 cents, eh?

8
5Cats 8 points ago +8 / -0

Didn't they literally drive a tank into the building while throwing explosives into it in 40 MPH winds? I seem to remember that.

Remember "Move" in Philadelphia? 500 police descended on their townhouse at 5:35 AM. They fired 10,000 rounds at the building, knowing there were children inside. Then they fire-bombed it...

13
5Cats 13 points ago +13 / -0

I remember it vividly.
The first AG ended up having a shit-load of provable "issues". Not the least of which was knowingly hiring illegals. She then tried to blame her husbando "he takes care of the yardwork" and even the feministas dropped her.
The second AG pick? Bill interviewed her for 15 minutes. Hillary for 2+ hours. WHY is the "First Lady" even interviewing such nominees? Hummm.
Hillary didn't like her politics, so suddenly she too had "illegal hires" and got dumped.

Then came Janet Reno. 😡

3
5Cats 3 points ago +3 / -0

EDIT: Archived Link Here

2 minutes of "this is how to deal with "reporters" who are idiots". Textbook!

Here's a Link to the X

X is aglow with people... defending Kendra Boone. Clearly none of them looked at this video or read any facts about the case. They blame... THE COP! Saying he "left the cruiser unlocked & running" and that this is... A CRIME!
Totes not her fault!
News flash for leftists: the cruiser WAS locked, it's seen clearly in the video. She climbed into a partly open window while the officer was walking over to her.

0
5Cats 0 points ago +1 / -1

Your idols, Hamas, they never hurt civilians, eh? GTFO already.
When has Hamas been "proportional"? They want to exterminate every Jew in Israel "from the river to the sea" and then the rest of the world. Against that doctrine, what response is "proportional"?

0
5Cats 0 points ago +1 / -1

Israel has never "carpet bombed" Gaza. In fact the opposite is the reality.
Leftists & facts are like vampires & sunlight. 👻

0
5Cats 0 points ago +1 / -1

No it is not. That's idiotic. War is hell, literally and physically.

If 1 enemy is hiding behind human shields? The harm caused to them is entirely on the enemy. That enemy is out to kill you, your comrades in arms AND your civilians. You kill him dead, unless he surrenders.

Don't kid yourself. The vast majority of Gazans supported Hamas on 10/7 and still support them to this day. The number of "civilian deaths" is shockingly LOW. No army in all of history has gone to such lengths to avoid civilian losses as the IDF. Not one.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›