1 rape-gang down, 99 to go! It only took them what? 10 years?
A few years back someone looked up the latest 100 persons in UK convicted of child-sex crimes. 88 of them had obviously Muslim names. There were 7 women on the list too, 5 with Muslim names. He linked the Gov't site, it was legit.
It can only have gotten worse since then.
No liberal-run city (which is almost all of them, even in Red states) actually wants to "solve the homeless problem" because there's so much juicy graft & corruption to be milked off of it.
Actually? If you have blood pressure or arterial problems? The "knee crossing" is much better for you :/
It all goes back to the cavemen. Cavegirls would be aware of their community, cavemen were busy getting food & water & other "brute force" jobs. Working hard every day. So if there was something extra that needed working on? Women would likely notice it first & get the men to do that. Because that's how to get cave-poontang!
Correct. The reason is: a stable & safe environment to get pregnant in. Pregnant humans are practically helpless, they cannot survive without support. Family, community and most importantly: the baby-father! That's what evolution has brought us, naturally.
So modern feminists naturally seek a safe & stable environment with strong men to protect them... at the same time they're told to drive strong men AWAY from themselves. Then comes the "taboo sex is best sex" and we get werewolf p0rn for girls 😝
It is due to cold winters. Most foreigners stay well clear of us after experiencing a January & February 😋 That's why Vancouver & Toronto are so popular with immigrants, mostly stable weather.
We in Manitoba have a joke: Even folks in North Dakota say "Move to Manitoba? Are you nuts? It's COLD up there!" 😀
Rape is VERY prevalent in their "culture" but somehow they don't train their kids to, you know, NOT talk to strangers.
It's weird. They want their kids to grow up care-free and cheerful, but leave them wide-open to predators :/ As soon as the girls hit a certain age though? They clamp them down & isolate them. Boys get away with being brats right up to their mid-teens.
It is relevant if there's some ambiguity. When he started driving away? THAT left no ambiguity at all: straight-up kidnapping.
But before that he was highly "sus" but not criminal.
Without the drive-off, would I let this guy within 10 meters of any kid? Hell no! What a creep. Boku no Pico Material eh?
What he did wasn't "kidnapping" ... until he started driving away. Then it 100% was.
However? While what he did was HIGHLY "sus" it wasn't a crime. Giving a kid a ride home, grabbing a snack? Because they're (I presume) the same "community" that's not unheard of. Maybe it looked like rain? BUT if the kid wasn't also a jeet? That's highly suspicious. Plus the "leave your gear here" is a huge red flag.
So the act of talking to the kid, giving the kid a ride & even getting a treat aren't criminal. The gear is huge & the driving away IS a crime.
18 months is a HUGE sentence in Canada, slaps on the wrist for non-Whites is SO commonplace.
You are correct. Just talking to kids in public isn't a crime. Whet this guy did after that should be though!
It's a big difference: "Hey lil dude! Catch anything? Nice day eh? Good luck!"
vs:
"Leave your gear behind & come get ice cream with me, I'll drive you home for reals!"
Boku no Pico starts with a car ride to get ice cream, ...or so I've been told!
It was 120 to 150 meters, several hundred (4-500) feet.
Not a difficult shot says people who do such things.
Yes, the situation leading up to the shooting is more than a little bit "suspect" eh? And the man who was obviously helping him scout the area days earlier? With the white van? No mention of any effort to find him. When they say "the shooter acted alone" they're not telling the whole truth.
The "problem" is not that they die quickly or slowly, the problem is that a live-birthed child is legally allowed to be killed. That doctors & nurses are absolved from their normal duty to provide life-saving care for them. Of course they're there to kill it in the first place, but to make it legal to kill babies after they're born is... troublesome.
Not for you though, obviously.
As for science (the other reply) there is a faith element to it, as pointed out by RA Wilson & Einstein too. Did the scientist fake their results? Were results accurately recorded? Was data manipulated, poorly collected or otherwise unreliable? Were the papers peer-reviewed or "pal reviewed"? Is the research repeatable?
One doesn't DO the experiment to see if it's accurate, one depends on the word of others, yes? Not much would get done if every scientist using a theory had to reproduce the experiment / research to verify it is accurate. They believe the word of others. That's an act of faith. See: 2b2 and 3. Faith is not limited to religion alone, ok?
Kamala would have continued Biden's & Obama's policies of blocking ANY power that's not "renewable". And also that is Nuclear, they'd never allow those either.
So the 9GB would have to come from W&S, lolz. That would kill it dead.
Um, yeah. That's kind of my point, eh?
W&S simply don't work. They require 100% backup OR rolling or even total blackouts that could last for days. Alarmists never seem to grasp this concept.
The greenies seem to think that 9GB of W&S needs 9GB of battery backup. Nope! To run for 2 days off batteries requires 9x48GB of backup battery capacity. 96GB capacity, at 4X the cost per GB of the W&S it backs up. IF the technology existed to do the job, it doesn't. Alarmists are stupid.
Or 9GB of Gas or Nuclear... but if you're building 9GB of gas, why build W&S (at twice the cost) at all? 🤔 Hydro is out, there are NO more large hydro projects left that could be viable.
Quite possible, but at least 2 other massive centers are in planning, backed by huge money. Lots of "smaller" ones needing only 2-3 GB of power are also planned. "only"
I have NO idea how these monstrosities will pay for themselves, or even what goals they hope to accomplish. I'm just pointing out the massive power demands they have & that they are NOT using Wind & Solar, eh?
No, in fact, a normal baby WILL die rather quickly after birth if not cared for. Starvation or hypothermia are swift killers for tiny infants. It will "go to sleep" and never wake up, eh?
So your foundation is that YOU (or any authority) get to decide who is a person or not. Based on arbitrary "rules" that can change like the wind. That's not science. Based on DNA is science.
"Value" is the ultimate arbitrary measure! Utterly unscientific. Just FYI. Just like "beauty" or "usefulness" or "scary" & etc.
Simple: there are things we humans do not understand. There's things we know we don't and things we don't know we don't. There's things we think we understand, but in fact are incorrect. & etc.
Spooky Action At A Distance aka: Einstein's Clock in the Box mind experiment. They actually carried this out, it's there, the impossible was proven to be real.
One of those things we don't know is what makes us human. Sentience? Salience? Sapience? Not commonly found in nature, especially all 3! But we humans have them & other fancy words too.
If souls exist? Then there is an afterlife & more things we currently don't understand. If they don't exist? It's highly likely we simply cease to exist when we die. Believing that souls set us apart from (most) animals has no cost. If we're right we win, and if we're wrong we won't care because we'll cease to exist. Simple really.
Abiogenesis & the origin of the universe. God created it, on purpose. Maybe He created the Big Bang? Why not? For what reason? We don't know, we can only guess. (Yes, I'm a Deist, eh?) BUT the odds against intelligent life, or almost any life, to "accidentally exist" after only 13.4 Billion years is astronomical. Add to that: where did the BB come from?
So: Believing in God and Souls (and Evolution too, of course) is just as scientific as the current scientific theories. No religion required. All science is based on faith too, eh?
Primarily, says me. I decide.
Oh, thanks for the answer. I am free to utterly ignore anything you decide, asw is the rest of the world. Cool.
The junkie is not a person, because he has acted like a junkie for his whole life.
So when he was 9? He was not a person? At 11, 15? how about 22 the year before the junk hit, was he a non-person then too? You do see how arbitrary and therefor irrelevant your "rules" are, right?
I am the KING of not confusing the map with the terrain. It's one of my favorite things to tell to idiotic leftists. "Prerequisite"? Humans are persons and persons are humans. It's an interchangeable word. You cannot claim a human is a non-human, and you cannot arbitrarily decide who is a person or not. I mean you as an individual can, but that's also the number of people who would base their ideology on your ideas: 1.
If governments gain the power to decide who is and is not a "person" that's when the cattle-cars start filling up, ok? Killing Fields, Holodomor, Great Leap Foreword & etc.
So they're going to build a bunch of Gas power stations JUST for the data center. Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary's company.
Why don't they build Wind & Solar? It's cheaper & perfect in every way! (/end sarc)
But really, they should build Nuclear power for it.
H for hospital, down for death :>
Speaking of slicing wrists? A friend (long ago) was in Papua New Guinea' VERY remote coastal jungle area (where the cannibals used to live) when he hacked his wrist with an axe. A Catholic Nun stitched up his tendons & wound (no anesthetic) & his friends carried him over mountains & valleys for 2 full days (he immediately got a fever) to the nearest village with a doctor. His scar is... remarkable! But he retained 90% use of his hand due to that Nun's expert stitching. It was a 45 degree cut :/