Across the nation massive YIMBY laws are being passed to mass produce cheap “homes” 12 to an acre while not addressing any of the causes of the housing shortage. For some reason, despite all logic and reason YIMBYs seem to be incapable of the reality that we need growth in small towns to balance growth over massive city hubs, that building new cities would reduce strain while also allowing INNOVATION that constantly replacing in old cities is vastly expensive (think placing central air in every building in Europe).
Instead YIMBYs love the Austin “model”. Here’s what Austin did, they flooded the market with sardine box apartments, half of Austin’s apartments are now single bedrooms or studios and the average size of ALL apartments are 830 sq feet. The average price per Sq Ft of homes in Austin is ~$320, ~$228 is the national average. However rental prices are down (if you ignore price per square foot)!
Any sane person could tell that overall price dropping while price per square feet increasing is massively bad, if eggs became 75% of their price tomorrow people would be happy, until they realized cartons now hold 8 eggs. YIMBYs however think that instead of using the millions of dying small towns for new cities and planned growth we should do the worst possible thing and cram more people into smaller homes that cost more.
building new things is good and both yimby/nimby have fundamental problems. there really has been too much created to block all forms of development, but the fundamental problem with the yimby reaction is that the things getting built are fucking terrible
removing local control is horrible. that's pretty much all you have. things went too far stopping development but the thing looming on the future is worse, which is leftist central planners dropping nightmare bombs in the middle of nice areas
part of the reason the nimby reaction got so out of hand is that people learned that having a "safe injection site" or a huge block of low income apartments nearby means their area is going to turn into a shithole. building new infrastructure or buildings now usually means what you have is going to get worse, and very rarely does it mean it will get better. either way it means it won't be the same, and certainly not a strictly better version of what already exists
not to mention some of the modern urbanist ideals and ideas are quite nice. I actually would prefer a walkable city, to be able to bike to local businesses, to rely on transit, and so on. the popular things on the topic over the internet. I actually used to have those things growing up. why did they go away? the areas I grew up in got destroyed by immigration. now taking transit is a fucking nightmare. I wouldn't dare send my children out in those areas like I used to do
the problem is society itself, and about 99% of that comes down to mass immigration and the destruction of civilization on the whole. that is the problem with yimby. what little power I have left against immigration is entirely at the local level, and yimby takes that away. I know that when you take away local zoning it's not going to mean more tennis courts in people's backyard, it's going to mean a giant building is getting put down right next to me and my home is gone forever. again
It wasn’t just immigration, anti redlining polices completely destroyed the cheap semi urban housing and let it go to shit. That was part of Bill “We will no longer be a White nation” Clinton’s and Alan “Line go up” Greenspans love child. That same love child also caused the housing bubble crisis and froze housing development for over a decade.
We could have thousands of walkable small cities today if the state government didn’t intentionally steer all job growth to cities while turning rural America into dumping grounds for no/low permanent job projects like data centers. Cities have really become city states and hold the rest of the state hostage of all resources and growth.
This is pretty on the nose.
A "walkable city" doesn't exist. It's called a small town, and the policies of the left deliberately killed it decades ago. They're selling fake antidotes to their own poison.
The fact that this is happening everywhere, all at once (much like the housing crisis itself), means it's synthetic.
YIMBYs are shills, not real people.
The housing cost problem is just one more issue that deporting 50 million migrant invaders could solve.
It would help, not fix, people are trying to price themselves out of ghetto black neighbors. Anymore that means you have to earn more than Laquishas 100k government salary working at the DMV.
i watched those police cam vids.. and one had a nice looking area with those small apartments.. and when the police tries to question 1 black.. a whole group of +30 blacks comes out of these nice looking apartments being all ghetto and ratchet. those assholes dont deserve those kinda apartments.
honestly.. should be used to give our recent graduates 2-3 years a cheap place to live for them to set up their life. after 2-3 years, they cant live there anymore.
As it turns out, social engineering and the great new societies plan not only didn’t work, it created the suburbs. Then when the suburbs were blamed for redlining the suburbs had to build suburbs and fracture more because leftists wanted to kill the middle class. Now, you have to pay almost half a million just to not live somewhere that is 80%+ White unless you go full rural.
Fuck that, I live in a small town that’s currently being flooded by retard hicklibs and if one more person moves here I’m starting a fire.
100 million must go, then the market will improve
We need efficient, cheap 3 bedroom houses ( with a possibility to add more rooms in the basement ) that don't look like demoralizing spawns of a Goyvernment.
And a plan for encourage White people in small towns to have ( larger ) families.
https://x.com/brian_lenney/status/2070268624896729592?s=46
This thread started my rant.
I'm not sure on the maths here. If rental prices are down then they are more in alignment with what the market is willing to cover. If they continue going down they will match with the national average. And if they go down again they will be cheaper than the national average.
All I'm seeing is that they are too expensive at the moment.
As for the rest, I'm not sure town planners ever have the town they want to have their family stay in be the ones they plan.
Rental prices are down because the new units are vastly smaller. They’re putting lipstick on a pig giving you an apartment 2/3rds the size as before at 75% of the price.
Thanks for clarifying :)