The idea that normies and NPCs don't communicate, but instead they "cast spells". As in they just try to find the right combination of words to get you to do what they want?
For instance, they want to shut you up, so they yell "that's bigoted". You might not even be racist in that moment, but it is something they say because they want you to stop talking.
What is the origin on that? I'm trying to share it with a friend. Thanks.
It's from Frieren. The episode where the demon army is having "peace talks" with the king in order to get him to lower the barrier protecting the castle.
Frieren explains that the demons don't actually communicate with words, to them they are nothing more than magic words that when said in the right combination get you to do what the demon wants you to do. Since the demons are predators of humans, this usually results in the death of the humans.
The real world analogue to this is the third worlders calling you racist when you object to their rabidly anti social behavior. They do it because they know they can influence your behavior with words like these, even though they themselves don't believe a word of it.
Whites are the only group of people who modify their behavior when someone calls them racist. That is why nonwhites use it. None of the nonwhite groups actually believe in equality or colorblindness or any of that liberal nonsense. It is literally them gaming the system to their advantage. They can use it to get money from lawsuits, use it to get promoted at work, use it as a shield against criticism, or in the recent case in England, use it to manipulate the police into arresting a man they stabbed instead of being arrested themselves.
There is a video that I can't find at the moment of an african migrant who doesn't speak English just repeating the word gib over and over again because he knows that if he says that word, the white female social worker will give him money, and he assumes it will work on the cameraman too.
60 sec Frieren clip that exemplifies the point:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFuqCO4lWKk
Holy hell the poast niggers were right
And i thought it was just another generic tranime with out of context quotes
It's pretty solid. I don't watch much modern anime but had heard good things about Frieren. Interesting premise. Kind of a "slice of life" in a fantasy setting with some absolutely brutal fights here and there.
Yeah but the main male character is a loser
Dunno, seems to me more like he's undergoing a hero's arc.
I like that they make him somewhat clueless, and don't have him salivating over the female lead.
Also, the writing definitely cuts both ways. Her reaction to him due to Frieren's intended birthday gift is the epitome of female logic. Akin to her having a dream about him with another woman and being mad at him for it.
There are definitely chads on the show, but yeah, the primary dude is pathetic.
You're an idiot for writing off an entire medium.
Everyone here is right, because its from all of these sources and more. Ive been saying it for years independently of any outside source. Its an awareness or realization you can gain sometimes by conversing with them after you've woken up, and it hits you like a ton of bricks. "This person isnt actually using thoughts to communicate with me... they are just saying phrases in hopes for a response. 'I cast magic missile at the darkness'. Holy shit. They arent truly conscious." And then it becomes a new level of understanding and worldview.
Thats why it instantly resonates with awake people. I cant tell you how many times I see this lightbulb over people's heads when I talk about it, because its a concept you already knew but didnt have formed into words.
Plus once you’re awoken it’s fun to see people mentally shutdown when the magic spell doesn’t work on you.
Its actually the best way to help THEM become to wake up as well. "You arent actually speaking to me. You are casting spells, hoping that your magic phrases will somehow get an outcome you want. Youre just repeating things from memory that have worked because the media told you they would. That is not thought. Stop using other people's ideas like a robot and try to make your own. What are youre actual words, and why?"
They may ree but that night they will lay in bed and question themselves.
Oh you sweet summer child. Maybe I've OD'd on black pills, but in my experience they just double down. They don't go to bed - they go to their echo chamber to reinforce what a bigot you are for, idk, advocating for objective, unbiased standards (moral, academic, professional) or whatever you've said to tilt them.
You think the Whites didn't try to reason with the Bolsheviks? The Nazis didn't try to reason with the SPD and the Communists?
Maybe if someone is just dipping their toes in the ideology, you can change them. But if they're calling you racist or whatever just to shut down a logical, coherent, well-thought out point... odds are they're too far gone. Zealots aren't well known for self-reflection.
Case in point
Clearly the Nazis were right in removing the scourge of transgenderism, but here this dipshit is acting like it was some sort of tragedy. And he is surrounded by a table full of dipshits who agree, broadcasting to an entire demographic of dipshits who agree. You aren't going to change that level of programming.
Its not about reasoning. These are herd people. They dont have thoughts for themselves - they have to be inserted. You pointing that out is inserting a new thought. It causes doubt, especially if done en masse. It eventually breaks the mirage of their echo chamber and they realize they are the minority.
See the link I posted in edit: https://cdn.videy.co/KcDApiTS1.mp4
You aren't a trusted source for inserting a new thought. Your certificate becomes invalid once you espouse objectivity that runs counter to their programming. Only the MSM are allowed to do that for the NPC. You don't get write access.
Thats simply untrue. There is a subset of people who that is accurate for, but that isnt the bulk of them. It does require finesse and integrity to do it, no you arent going to be some random guy on the street changing their mind.
Im talking about people in your life and community who see you as a person, not a stranger. A stranger isnt even thought of. Nothing they say good or bad will ever effect anything for anyone.
I lost some 90% of my friend group between covid and "controversial trans stuff" occurring alongside covid. Didn't refute my arguments, didn't ponder my arguments, just stopped talking to me once I cited true, observable statistics and well-known science. I even had more than one guy DM me and say (paraphrased) "you're right, but we can't be friends anymore." And in one case I said I understood - his wife and sister had/have more permanent connections to him than I did/do, so he was preserving his social safety net in lieu of the truth. Like any good collectivist would do - "Go along to get along" becomes "go along to get it wrong."
Got accused of watching Fox News and written off as a "Fox News watcher" from yet another long time friend even though I very much don't watch Fox News, so idk where that idea even came from if not collectivist programming to "other" people like me (and the "other" are a collective too in their mind, so they all do the same thing).
I could go through all of them, but suffice it to say... I guess we've had different experiences. The past 5-6 years have been a referendum on the truth in my life, with most of my (ex) friends opting for the lies.
Just stop caring what they say. Why would you listen to these things anyway?
Yea Chris Plante has been describing this phenomenon for at least a decade with a recurring expression: "They say the words, but they don't know what they mean."
Kinda funny that we can all understand the meaning through different expressions, while a leftist coddling a nigger while chastising a White for the same behavior "isn't racist" because y'know, Leftism. "Racist" is a magic word.
Oh and how can I forget Michael Knowles' book Speechless: Controlling, Words Controlling Minds which also goes on at length about this (not new or novel) phenomenon.
That's a password, which I think is different from a spell (in this context).
Another common right wing adage: leftists pretend not to know things in order to maintain and advance their ideology. Basically leftists play dumb, are bad faith actors, must systematically deny reality because it is not compatible with their worldviews, etc. So a lot of leftists do know what words mean but nevertheless choose to communicate deceptively and dishonestly. I think that self-awareness, that deliberate malevolent intelligence, is a prerequisite to qualify as a spell caster lol
The question is: are they not thinking because they aren't capable, or are they actually acting under a "spell" that someone else has put on them?
I don't think it's a binary. Nearly all of them demonstrate the ability to legitimately think about at least a handful of non-political/cultural issues, but most people seemingly aren't capable of resisting or breaching any consensus, no matter how obviously astroturfed or incorrect. The potential stakes of going against the herd are too great for most to bear. Wizards know this and take maximum advantage of it. The best spells are aoe.
They arent capable of creating unique independent thougnt. They are capable of thinking deeply about other people's thoughts. They are 3r allele people.
They're not even capable of that. It's "what makes me feel good right now" and "nothing is ever my fault" at most. See the "time has no meaning to the nigger" pasta.
Those are also implanted in their head. Look up 2r, 3r, 3.5r, 4r alleles it is FASCINATING.
It's how they can cry about "the threat of right wing White male violence" and celebrate Charlie Kirk's murder in the same breath, then seconds later deny they said anything at all and claim you're harassing them. Words are merely a tool for emotional manipulation.
It's rhetoric versus dialectic.
Contrary to the Frieren guy, it's not actually from Frieren, it's just a parallel that may or may not come from real-world political observations. The Distributist did a series on "Magical Words" in 2018. I don't think he originally came up with the idea, but it's been a while since I listened to it. He may have a reference to its original use somewhere in there if it wasn't him.
It's just sociopathy and it's as old as time. Whenever a sociopath interacts with you it's to press buttons to make you do something.
It shows up in liberals so much because of 'performative' fake emotions and rituals required by their ideology. In essence they are cosplay sociopaths.
I think it's a better way to look at it because it explains their other actions; for example, it's completely logical to stop ICE from deporting a cold blooded killer not because they have empathy for the guy or want killers here but for the personal reward they get from it.
Might not be the origin but Owen Benjamin has been talking about it for a long time. It's been proliferating in a lot of different places from different angles lately.
Isn't Owen Benjewmin a (((spellcaster))) himself? He probably knows all the inside tricks these vile negromancers cast upon their orcish pets to terrorize humanity
On his father's side, which according to them means no. He's an open Holohoax denier and has been getting himself cancelled for more than a decade. His new book defines the whole concept of word spells quite well and it's been getting a lot of attention.
There are few people disliked more than apostates.
Didn't associate it until you mentioned book writing, but Michael Knowles' Speechless: Controlling, Words Controlling Minds discusses the same thing at length.
You got the book name on hand?
How to Slay a Wizard.
Fantastic read so far https://dokumen.pub/qdownload/how-to-slay-a-wizard-v-002.html
Thank you. I ordered it to add to the collection.
Magic words? Let's ask the demon's mouthpiece, Wikipedia:
Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a pseudoscientific approach to communication, personal development, and psychotherapy that first appeared in Richard Bandler and John Grinder's book The Structure of Magic I (1975).
...
Bandler and Grinder assert that behavior (both our own and others') can be understood through these sensory-based internal representations. Behavior here includes verbal and non-verbal communication, as well as effective or adaptive behaviors and less helpful or "pathological" ones. They also assert that behavior in both the self and other people can be modified by manipulating these sense-based subjective representations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro-linguistic_programming
NLP teaches that we constantly make "anchors" (classical conditioning) between what we see, hear and feel; and our emotional states. While in an emotional state if a person is exposed to a unique stimulus (sight, sound or touch), then a connection is made between the emotion and the unique stimulus. If the unique stimulus occurs again, the emotional state will then be triggered. NLP teaches that anchors (such as a particular touch associated with a memory or state) can be deliberately created and triggered to help people access 'resourceful' or other target states.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_neuro-linguistic_programming#Anchoring
The word "racist" is anchored to feelings of guilt that certain people have been conditioned to feel through the media-industrial complex, giving it its "magical" power over those people.
Kabbalah
Look up the origins of Communications. It's a study of how we send information to each other. Signs, words, slogans, ECT. Many students think they can now control people by using what they learned.
James Lindsay talks a good bit about it.
The caster of woke right spell (failed)
Ironic, isn't it?
It's been around awhile. I first heard of it from Turd Flinging Monkey, prior to being kicked off of YouTube. I'd guess that was well over 10 years ago, now.
It's important to differentiate between "using passwords" and "casting spells". The latter suggests a degree of sophistication and intent (as well as IQ) that really isn't required for the former. Someone who is "casting spells" is ruthlessly wielding rhetoric (as opposed to dialectic) in order to cynically manipulate people's behavior. In contrast, mindlessly repeating words in order to trigger an automatic system-level response is just "typing in a password".
The best example of the "password" concept is invader immigrants invoking "refugee" or "asylum" status in order to game Western immigration laws. Economic migrants have been coached by leftist NGOs to cry "refugee/asylum" because these are deliberately embedded legal terms - passwords - that effectively bypass our immigration systems. The entire strategy is to say whatever gets them into the country because they know it will take years - if ever - for the law to catch up to them.
And the NGOs know that the refugee/asylum "password" works because fellow leftists in government were the ones who created the loophole in the first place. They're also the ones who made it a legal, logistical, and administrative nightmare to track down and deport anyone here illegally. If crossing the border is as easy as saying one word, and reversing it requires years of expensive work, then the net result will of course be infinite immigration.
When a "magical spell" has been institutionalized by decades of indoctrination, then it can become a password. That's where we're at with accusations of racism. The academics and media who programmed society to view racism as "the ultimate evil and an exclusively white behavior" were designing and casting a complicated spell. The low IQ retards who came next, breathlessly crying racism at every opportunity, are just speaking a password.
You can tell which one is happening mostly by who is doing it but also by reaction to your opposition. If you reject someone who is speaking a password, they will chimp out. Because they can't fathom why or how you are rejecting what they've been programmed to believe is unassailable truth. They are like a monkey who has been conditioned to expect food in exchange for a certain noise and is now being denied food after making that noise. Their only response option is to crash out.
If you circumvent or interrupt a "spell caster", they will reveal themselves to be a conscious and deliberate actor. They may tactically retreat, immediately abandoning their failing argument. They may try a different spell, usually adjacent to the first one but sometimes completely detached. Or they might rapid fire passwords in an attempt to overwhelm you (or deceive third parties). The key difference is the clear presence of a (malevolent) intelligence.
In either case, we're basically talking about rhetoric versus dialectic, about language as purely transactional and coldly manipulative versus language as collaborative exchange moving towards objective truth. In both cases, a lot of people don't realize that their communication methods and goals are entirely different from (and incompatible with) the communication strategies of others. And projecting your own earnest and cooperative communication strategies onto people who are either too stupid or too evil to reciprocate is a recipe for disaster.
The "objective truth" bit is important. When someone rejects the idea of any objective reality whatsoever, then you are dealing with a person who is necessarily incapable of collaborative, cooperative, or good-faith communication. Every word out of his or her mouth will be pure rhetoric aimed only at manipulating others to serve his or her desires. Any good or truth resulting from your exchanges with him or her will be accidental or incidental.
"I don't actually believe or even understand the meanings of these words coming out of my mouth, but if I use the right combination you might do what I want, then I can want something else and use different words." They communicate entirely in lying, gaslighting and victim blaming, including accusing you of not understanding the very words they're misusing (if not outright making up).
Nons rarely comprehend English even if they seem to speak it proficiently. Think how rappers just rhyme words they think sound good rather than make any sense with what they say (at least they did, they've given up even on that with just rhyming the same word, not even trying to rhyme or ooga-booga mumbling).
It's a lot like cargo cult behavior. You see this frequently with low IQ people evoking the terminology of formal arguments and fallacies. These people have seen someone else "win" an argument using specific phrases, and they expect that saying those phrases will auto-win entirely different arguments. It's the linguistic equivalent of magic dirt lol
How many niggers started shouting UH CANT BREEV while being arrested after George Floyd?