"The military could use external partners like the Canadian Human Rights Commission. It could also bring in experts from the civil corporate sector or send cadets to civilian universities, where diversity is years ahead of what we'll ever see in military colleges. If you just recruit white boys who like guns but don't like women or anybody who doesn't look like them, you'll perpetuate that culture."
Dishonest journalism like Juno news just slashes it down to one sentence fragment and says she was calling soldiers names.
You're retarded. Someone saying "If you don't do X, you'll have Y, and they aren't doing X" is, in fact, exactly saying that Y is happening. Juno isn't being dishonest, you are.
Are you seriously claiming that Canada only recruits white boys who like guns? Because last I checked, Canada's armed forces were only 69% white men.
Which is a good thing, because if you have to serve with someone who's not a white man, you're less likely to develop that "everyone who's not a white man must die or become a slave" mentality that's so prevalent here.
As much as anyone who's not in the military, I guess. Two of my best friends from high school were military and I got a pretty clear picture. One of them's dead now.
Are you seriously claiming that Canada only recruits white boys who like guns?
No, that's what she's doing.
If you just recruit white boys who like guns but don't like women or anybody who doesn't look like them, you'll perpetuate that culture."
If that wasn't already the culture, what is she even talking about? Why would you need "diversity" to change a culture that doesn't actually exist? Ergo, she thinks the military is "recruiting White boys who like guns etc"
No, she's not claiming that. That's the point. The author of this article, and you, really want her to be claiming that, and you consider it barely an inconvenience that she isn't. You can just pretend.
what is she even talking about?
Her desire to further diversify Canada's Armed Forces, because a non-diverse army will inevitably create shitty cultures of ignorance and hate.
So in other words Louise just said he wants to accelerate military DEI by putting in even more radical and unqualified people in it. Even to the point that the current already DEI'd military isn't radical enough for him because it still somehow has white culture in it.
Um, Louise Arbour's a woman. A 79-year-old woman, at that.
But, yeah, she wants more DEI in the military, because she doesn't want a military composed entirely of Neo-Nazis. Because - let's face it - they want to kill fucking everybody who isn't them. It's kinda dangerous for a country to keep a bunch of heavily armed Neo-Nazis on the payroll; eventually they might slip their leash.
You think I'm slandering the hypothetical Canadian military composed entirely of Neo-Nazis that Louise Arbour's trying to avoid? Um, sure.
The actual Canadian military's only 69% white men, which is good, because it makes you a lot less likely to become a Neo-Nazi when you're training alongside someone who isn't exactly like you.
Words aren't violence, but they can certainly announce it. "I am going to punch you in the face" are words that clearly demonstrate that you're a violent person and an enemy of peace. So are "People like you are going to be some of the first ones that need to be dealt with."
I'm not using it literally but figuratively that you're welcome to use literally if that suits you. These people are anti-White and therefore they are evil and must be exterminated from society if we are going to improve society.
Dishonest article.
Arbour said this in a 2022 interview:
"The military could use external partners like the Canadian Human Rights Commission. It could also bring in experts from the civil corporate sector or send cadets to civilian universities, where diversity is years ahead of what we'll ever see in military colleges. If you just recruit white boys who like guns but don't like women or anybody who doesn't look like them, you'll perpetuate that culture."
Dishonest journalism like Juno news just slashes it down to one sentence fragment and says she was calling soldiers names.
You're retarded. Someone saying "If you don't do X, you'll have Y, and they aren't doing X" is, in fact, exactly saying that Y is happening. Juno isn't being dishonest, you are.
Are you seriously claiming that Canada only recruits white boys who like guns? Because last I checked, Canada's armed forces were only 69% white men.
Which is a good thing, because if you have to serve with someone who's not a white man, you're less likely to develop that "everyone who's not a white man must die or become a slave" mentality that's so prevalent here.
Good job demonstrating how you never debate in good faith, faggot.
Pretty sure you have no idea what the phrase "in good faith" means; you just read it a few times and think it makes you sound smart to repeat it.
You're such a fucking faggot lol
Yeah, only homosexuals don't want a Neo-Nazi military. Sure. That's gotta be it.
You sound like a ban evader.
He sounds exactly like one of our mysteriously disappeared midwits.
I've evaded bans before, sure. Who hasn't?
Not here, though. This is the only account I've ever had here. I actually am new.
What would you know about serving
As much as anyone who's not in the military, I guess. Two of my best friends from high school were military and I got a pretty clear picture. One of them's dead now.
Are you a soldier, friend?
No, that's what she's doing.
If that wasn't already the culture, what is she even talking about? Why would you need "diversity" to change a culture that doesn't actually exist? Ergo, she thinks the military is "recruiting White boys who like guns etc"
No, she's not claiming that. That's the point. The author of this article, and you, really want her to be claiming that, and you consider it barely an inconvenience that she isn't. You can just pretend.
Her desire to further diversify Canada's Armed Forces, because a non-diverse army will inevitably create shitty cultures of ignorance and hate.
So in other words Louise just said he wants to accelerate military DEI by putting in even more radical and unqualified people in it. Even to the point that the current already DEI'd military isn't radical enough for him because it still somehow has white culture in it.
Bro this is a known faggot leftoid stop engaging in good faith with it. Bitch loves
Um, Louise Arbour's a woman. A 79-year-old woman, at that.
But, yeah, she wants more DEI in the military, because she doesn't want a military composed entirely of Neo-Nazis. Because - let's face it - they want to kill fucking everybody who isn't them. It's kinda dangerous for a country to keep a bunch of heavily armed Neo-Nazis on the payroll; eventually they might slip their leash.
what you're slandering as neo nazis are heritage canadians
You're talking to a stray reddit leftoid, everything outside that guy's tiny echo chamber is nazis and various types of antiistophobes.
You think I'm slandering the hypothetical Canadian military composed entirely of Neo-Nazis that Louise Arbour's trying to avoid? Um, sure.
The actual Canadian military's only 69% white men, which is good, because it makes you a lot less likely to become a Neo-Nazi when you're training alongside someone who isn't exactly like you.
You litterally smear people as nazi while defending communism and antiWhitism. Gtfo back to reddit or bluesky you tankie retard
What the living fuck are you talking about? When have I ever said anything at all about Communism?
It's not a "smear" to call a Nazi a Nazi. Half this fucking site is Neo-Nazis.
What "neo nazi" did you hear say this? The only people I hear saying stuff like this are Jewish trannies...
I don't know, roughly two out of three people on communities.win? Click on just about any post history and there are calls for mass slaughter.
You retarded faggot.
Yes, that is an example of calling someone names. Good job, Ricky. You get a cookie.
Thanks, retarded faggot.
People like you are going to be some of the first ones that need to be dealt with.
There's some of that good ole Neo-Nazi violence!
Classic communist. Words are violence, eh?
Words aren't violence, but they can certainly announce it. "I am going to punch you in the face" are words that clearly demonstrate that you're a violent person and an enemy of peace. So are "People like you are going to be some of the first ones that need to be dealt with."
That's exactly what she said. Don't defend these demons.
Lol. "Demons." Your mammy sure taught you some dumb shit.
I'm not using it literally but figuratively that you're welcome to use literally if that suits you. These people are anti-White and therefore they are evil and must be exterminated from society if we are going to improve society.
Louise Arbour's a French-Canadian Catholic. She's got three children and three grandchildren. I doubt she wants them all to burn for being white.
Maybe she's not "anti-white" so much as she's just not a white supremacist, eh?