Nor should they. Everyone should be loud and proud about their beliefs. Subterfuge and hidden motives tend to be malicious in nature, and we'd have a heck of an easier time educating the populace if all the quiet backstabby lying types instead just said their intentions in as clear English as the redditheist.
My personal view is we had a half-dozen or so people who actually knew some inkling of SOME intentions of God, and those fractions of intent were then told, re-told, re-told, re-told, translated, re-told, translated, re-told again, and localized five times in the process, and we all know how good a job localizers do.
God's Truth is the ultimate Truth. It is objective, unchanging and the universe is built on it. Theoretically, we can derive Truth (or a good portion of it) from simply observing the world God created (although maybe not the parts of Truth that lie outside physical existence).
So the constant retelling and discussion and testing, rather than diluting the original pure message, separates the wheat from the chaff.
The double standard on this is actually really annoying, and a big part of what makes atheists who bother speaking up so militant.
In almost any context, the religious can bring up their beliefs and espouse them ad nauseum. They can tell you how their morals and eorldviews are shaped by it, and how you should contort your own to fit. They'll tell you, with great confidence, about the history of the universe and how reality itself functions, as described in their holy book(s).
And this is all generally seen as perfectly normal and correct. The only push-back you might expect to get is from people who either have a different religion, or come from a different sect or denomination of your own, and that pushback is most often of the sort that goes "no, sky king said not to eat the green round pickles on Thursdays. The green square pickles are perfectly fine!".
And then the atheist pipes up with some banal and milquetoast "I think that sounds like a load of rubbish", and suddenly the metaphorical (or literal, if you're arguing with mudslimes) knives come out.
Honestly, the militancy of the people who bother arguing against religiosity online shouldn't be remotely suprising. You filter out the conflict averse by the sheer amount of bullying they get, and all you end up left with are the people both willing and able to tell you to get fucked, as well as an axe to grind on the issue.
And this is all generally seen as perfectly normal and correct.
Because it is.
If you brought a screaming retard with Down's Syndrome into a family restaurant, you'd be looked askance by all the normal people.
Atheism is a deformity. They're loud because their beliefs are self manifestly false, so they need to shout down others and conjure a climate of mocking criticism of the non deformed.
It's like how most of the deaf are such incredibly toxic people. They behave the same way, talking about their deformity as though it makes them special instead of freaks, talking down to normal people and reinforcing their shared delusions for the sake of ego.
the atheist pipes up with some banal and milquetoast
A hilarious, even farcical reduction of their actual behavior, which is that most of them transparently reject objective morality in order to have an excuse to be a bad person, typically in a whole bunch of ways.
There's a reason why even Zoomers consider reddit atheists to be living jokes. To paraphrase my teenage daughter(and be glad I'm filtering out the brainrot) "Saying you're an atheist in 2026 makes me think the next words out of your mouth are going to be about the age of consent."
So far since he's been on this board I've only seen him whine about Christianity and spew apologetics for mohammadans and pedophiles.
I just saw his defense of the jeet kidnapper
Right? So blatant I found myself wondering if it's Imp on another alt now that he finally got banned from anywhere with an audience.
If so, it must be taking all his meager willpower to hold back from ranting about natalism.
I dunno, she made the switch to "Stormcucks" easily enough. She'll attack anything the benefits the West.
Why would I whine about Christianity? Religion is suited only for drooling retards, but that's not a whine - it's a simple observation.
Case in point. No atheist, ever, has been able to keep his atheautism to himself.
As an atheist i can say we aren’t all like… oh wait im proving your point :-(
Nor should they. Everyone should be loud and proud about their beliefs. Subterfuge and hidden motives tend to be malicious in nature, and we'd have a heck of an easier time educating the populace if all the quiet backstabby lying types instead just said their intentions in as clear English as the redditheist.
My personal view is we had a half-dozen or so people who actually knew some inkling of SOME intentions of God, and those fractions of intent were then told, re-told, re-told, re-told, translated, re-told, translated, re-told again, and localized five times in the process, and we all know how good a job localizers do.
I think it's the opposite.
God's Truth is the ultimate Truth. It is objective, unchanging and the universe is built on it. Theoretically, we can derive Truth (or a good portion of it) from simply observing the world God created (although maybe not the parts of Truth that lie outside physical existence).
So the constant retelling and discussion and testing, rather than diluting the original pure message, separates the wheat from the chaff.
Somewhat of a fallacy since anyone that does proves the point, and those who don't remain an unknown value to be ignored when discussing things.
It's a paraphrase of the old joke about Crossfit. "How do you know if someone does Crossfit? Don't worry, they'll tell you."
The double standard on this is actually really annoying, and a big part of what makes atheists who bother speaking up so militant.
In almost any context, the religious can bring up their beliefs and espouse them ad nauseum. They can tell you how their morals and eorldviews are shaped by it, and how you should contort your own to fit. They'll tell you, with great confidence, about the history of the universe and how reality itself functions, as described in their holy book(s).
And this is all generally seen as perfectly normal and correct. The only push-back you might expect to get is from people who either have a different religion, or come from a different sect or denomination of your own, and that pushback is most often of the sort that goes "no, sky king said not to eat the green round pickles on Thursdays. The green square pickles are perfectly fine!".
And then the atheist pipes up with some banal and milquetoast "I think that sounds like a load of rubbish", and suddenly the metaphorical (or literal, if you're arguing with mudslimes) knives come out.
Honestly, the militancy of the people who bother arguing against religiosity online shouldn't be remotely suprising. You filter out the conflict averse by the sheer amount of bullying they get, and all you end up left with are the people both willing and able to tell you to get fucked, as well as an axe to grind on the issue.
Because it is.
If you brought a screaming retard with Down's Syndrome into a family restaurant, you'd be looked askance by all the normal people.
Atheism is a deformity. They're loud because their beliefs are self manifestly false, so they need to shout down others and conjure a climate of mocking criticism of the non deformed.
It's like how most of the deaf are such incredibly toxic people. They behave the same way, talking about their deformity as though it makes them special instead of freaks, talking down to normal people and reinforcing their shared delusions for the sake of ego.
A hilarious, even farcical reduction of their actual behavior, which is that most of them transparently reject objective morality in order to have an excuse to be a bad person, typically in a whole bunch of ways.
There's a reason why even Zoomers consider reddit atheists to be living jokes. To paraphrase my teenage daughter(and be glad I'm filtering out the brainrot) "Saying you're an atheist in 2026 makes me think the next words out of your mouth are going to be about the age of consent."
Eh?
You sound like you're 12.
I'm an atheist and you're just fucking embarrassing. You are a midwit that doesn't know what he doesn't know.
And you sound like a lonely faggot who wants to suck up to insane people because he can't find real friends.