Does that mean they get to "reconsider" it and then go back and do same fucking thing? That's often how it goes in the US when an appeals court tells a trial judge to "reconsider" packing your shit in.
Probably. IIRC, most of the mandates that were overturned in, say, Alberta were a matter of not following proper procedure, rather than inherently being tyrannical, ineffectual bullshit.
I was just looking at one where the Supreme Court ruled an official couldn't use her office to intimidate the NRA by threatening people doing business with them, and they kicked it back to the appeals court who ruled said official has qualified immunity since what she was doing at the time could reasonably be believed to be legal.
Indeed, if nobody is punished nothing matters. It’s like being abused and then the person apologizes. It’s annoying meaningless bullshit that you now have to deal with after each abuse.
It doesn't matter. Government will charge 44.01% instead of 44% in taxes, or just print a few extra trillions (and inflation will be 8.1% instead of 8%) and the sheeps will line up to pay.
Does that mean they get to "reconsider" it and then go back and do same fucking thing? That's often how it goes in the US when an appeals court tells a trial judge to "reconsider" packing your shit in.
Probably. IIRC, most of the mandates that were overturned in, say, Alberta were a matter of not following proper procedure, rather than inherently being tyrannical, ineffectual bullshit.
I was just looking at one where the Supreme Court ruled an official couldn't use her office to intimidate the NRA by threatening people doing business with them, and they kicked it back to the appeals court who ruled said official has qualified immunity since what she was doing at the time could reasonably be believed to be legal.
Whoopsie poopsie, we heckin' accidentally a dictatorship.
Indeed, if nobody is punished nothing matters. It’s like being abused and then the person apologizes. It’s annoying meaningless bullshit that you now have to deal with after each abuse.
Especially because they're currently appealing the second judgment against them for abusing the Emergencies Act.
Let me know when Canadian Nuremberg starts.
Until then this means nothing.
You want a show trial with coerced confessions from tortured prisoners leading to the executions of the good guys?
Sounds awful.
I was gonna say... May as well just hang people without pretense. It would be more honest.
Oh good so now I can enter the woods in 2025.
you could always enter the woods
Wow I can'tt wait to get my monetary compensaion for t hat!
It'll sure be great once they give me back some of the money they took from me!
Ok great…. however it doesn’t matter when the country is still being flooded with jeets.
Nah
Yeah
It doesn't matter. Government will charge 44.01% instead of 44% in taxes, or just print a few extra trillions (and inflation will be 8.1% instead of 8%) and the sheeps will line up to pay.
Sucks for the sheep :D
And how many politicians are going to be swinging from the gallows as a result?
Oh, none of them you say? Sounds like evil deeds don't have consequences then.
Not with THAT attitude.
Soooh-reee abooot dat, eh!
Until the (literal) fascists who did it swing the faggotizing of Snow Mexico will continue unabated.
So are we going to imprison the politicians? If not, this is worthless.