Does that mean they get to "reconsider" it and then go back and do same fucking thing? That's often how it goes in the US when an appeals court tells a trial judge to "reconsider" packing your shit in.
Probably. IIRC, most of the mandates that were overturned in, say, Alberta were a matter of not following proper procedure, rather than inherently being tyrannical, ineffectual bullshit.
I was just looking at one where the Supreme Court ruled an official couldn't use her office to intimidate the NRA by threatening people doing business with them, and they kicked it back to the appeals court who ruled said official has qualified immunity since what she was doing at the time could reasonably be believed to be legal.
Does that mean they get to "reconsider" it and then go back and do same fucking thing? That's often how it goes in the US when an appeals court tells a trial judge to "reconsider" packing your shit in.
Probably. IIRC, most of the mandates that were overturned in, say, Alberta were a matter of not following proper procedure, rather than inherently being tyrannical, ineffectual bullshit.
I was just looking at one where the Supreme Court ruled an official couldn't use her office to intimidate the NRA by threatening people doing business with them, and they kicked it back to the appeals court who ruled said official has qualified immunity since what she was doing at the time could reasonably be believed to be legal.