They're also incentivized to cut corners to reduce cost
So is the federal government. The more they cut corners, the more they can funnel to their corrupt friends and family that "run" the programs doing the corner cutting.
This simply is not true. Even if it were to be better at embezzling, you don't throw out a whole goddamn server rack full of hardware that never made it out of the shrinkwrap for reaching end of life before it got put into production if you're cutting corners effectively. The federal government is one big pile of wasteful spending from top to bottom. However bad you think it is, I assure you that it is worse and that more of it is incompetence than corruption.
Well there has to be some regulations in place, public or private. I'd rather take my chances with incentives for a private company regulated with a baseline standard and routine audits.
Yea, some regulations are called being sued by the families of those who died when the airlines could have prevented whatever happened with effective security.
If I were in charge I'd 1) remove all prohibition for concealed carrying firearms anywhere in any airport or airplane, and 2) establish strict liability for the airlines for any and all terrorism incidents that happen with one of their planes.
Yes, but I also remember why the TSA exists. Not that the TSA necessarily deserves the credit for ending it, but decades of hijackings finally culminating in three thousand murders isn't the part people are nostalgic about.
TSA is a welfare jobs program for minorities. They have a 95% test failure rate and slow down travel time dramatically.
So airlines and airports privately could do this better especially since they have an economic incentive to make it efficient yet catch bad actors?
I don't know if I'd go that far. They're also incentivized to cut corners to reduce cost for the almighty shareholder and line going up.
So is the federal government. The more they cut corners, the more they can funnel to their corrupt friends and family that "run" the programs doing the corner cutting.
This simply is not true. Even if it were to be better at embezzling, you don't throw out a whole goddamn server rack full of hardware that never made it out of the shrinkwrap for reaching end of life before it got put into production if you're cutting corners effectively. The federal government is one big pile of wasteful spending from top to bottom. However bad you think it is, I assure you that it is worse and that more of it is incompetence than corruption.
Well there has to be some regulations in place, public or private. I'd rather take my chances with incentives for a private company regulated with a baseline standard and routine audits.
Yea, some regulations are called being sued by the families of those who died when the airlines could have prevented whatever happened with effective security.
If I were in charge I'd 1) remove all prohibition for concealed carrying firearms anywhere in any airport or airplane, and 2) establish strict liability for the airlines for any and all terrorism incidents that happen with one of their planes.
Anyone else remember a time when the TSA didn't exist?
I remember when you could smoke on airplanes. And when they were "stewardesses", and actually good looking.
God, I am getting old.
That's still a thing on international airlines that aren't part of the West's civilizational suicide.
Any airline outside America and the UK has attractive and young stewardesses.
I remember Pajeets wandering around, pretending to be deaf and hawking stickers for $5 each.
Yes, but I also remember why the TSA exists. Not that the TSA necessarily deserves the credit for ending it, but decades of hijackings finally culminating in three thousand murders isn't the part people are nostalgic about.
And here we see the JIDF poster bringing up 9/11. TSA exists because your bosses blew up some buildings.
What is the difference between you and any other leftist freak who insists on absolving Muslims of their many sins?