I don't need a study to know that babies, regardless of race and including black babies cared for by White doctors have a better chance of survival than babies cared for by black doctors. I don't need the study because I understand reality, something DEI NPCs will never understand. Their whole ideology is just trying to prove reality is false which means anytime they finally create a study that aligns with reality being false, we immediately know the study is wrong because we live in reality, which cannot be false.
Even if we manage to bury the woke cultural push and take back our workplaces, entertainment, pop culture, and even politics from the woke mob, the damage that's been done to scholarship will be the real lasting problem: 20 years of published research from pretty much every field is completely untrustworthy.
All this study has shown is that DEI hires cannot be trusted with babies - in a provable way which means they shouldn't ever be near them, as doctors, teachers, police officers or strangers walking by.
i don't blame the DEI hires, I blame those who hired them, trained them and pushed this narrative to the net loss of everyone else.
Correct assessment. Without DEI, these people wouldn't have been able to pass the tests and get certified in the first place. The shit filter is what's compromised.
the whole academic system is so vulnerable to ideological capture, it's hard to believe it wasn't designed that way on purpose.
the entire system is a popularity contest, where approved people get to decide whether a finding is accepted or denied. they pay lip service to reproducibility, but the reality is nobody gives a shit about reproducibility, just whether the approved people like the outcome or not.
Shouldn't the metaphor be that pro baseball hitters have HIGHER offensive stats against Nolan Ryan than academics do in standing up to wokeness & pushing back against subversive narratives?
Nolan Ryan = Hall of Fame pitcher, notoriously hard to square up, even for pro MLBers
So wouldn't the comparison be that professional ballplayers, who historically didn't fare well against Ryan, still performed better in the end against him as babyshit-soft researchers afraid of being canceled by gay race communism?
Apologies for the pedantics & if I missed something completely.
No surprise. I feel even more stupid for thinking back in 2012 that this infestation in colleges would run its course. I guess it’s always been there. I went to college on base with old crusty sergeants at night. Different environment for sure lol
studies and polls can ALWAYS be manipulated to tell a different story.
More and more people are realizing 'science' isn't totally objective... It's subjective. Because everyone wants their work to prove how smart they are...
Fundamentally, the questions scientists chose to ask are rooted in their beliefs; there is no such thing as "objective" science and we should be very wary of anyone who claims it.
Well if you account for all the black babies aborted by white doctors it would be very accurate but I'm ok with that if blacks didn't kill their babies at current and previous numbers the black population would be double what it is right now. That's double the crime, double the welfare, double the fatigue.
I don't need a study to know that babies, regardless of race and including black babies cared for by White doctors have a better chance of survival than babies cared for by black doctors. I don't need the study because I understand reality, something DEI NPCs will never understand. Their whole ideology is just trying to prove reality is false which means anytime they finally create a study that aligns with reality being false, we immediately know the study is wrong because we live in reality, which cannot be false.
Even if we manage to bury the woke cultural push and take back our workplaces, entertainment, pop culture, and even politics from the woke mob, the damage that's been done to scholarship will be the real lasting problem: 20 years of published research from pretty much every field is completely untrustworthy.
On the plus side, we have meaningful work for an entire generation of based scientists.
All this study has shown is that DEI hires cannot be trusted with babies - in a provable way which means they shouldn't ever be near them, as doctors, teachers, police officers or strangers walking by.
i don't blame the DEI hires, I blame those who hired them, trained them and pushed this narrative to the net loss of everyone else.
Correct assessment. Without DEI, these people wouldn't have been able to pass the tests and get certified in the first place. The shit filter is what's compromised.
the whole academic system is so vulnerable to ideological capture, it's hard to believe it wasn't designed that way on purpose.
the entire system is a popularity contest, where approved people get to decide whether a finding is accepted or denied. they pay lip service to reproducibility, but the reality is nobody gives a shit about reproducibility, just whether the approved people like the outcome or not.
Once the idea of "objectivity" is outed as absurd, the only question is "which world view produces the best results?"
Batters have lower offensive stats against Nolan Ryan
Shouldn't the metaphor be that pro baseball hitters have HIGHER offensive stats against Nolan Ryan than academics do in standing up to wokeness & pushing back against subversive narratives?
Nolan Ryan = Hall of Fame pitcher, notoriously hard to square up, even for pro MLBers
So wouldn't the comparison be that professional ballplayers, who historically didn't fare well against Ryan, still performed better in the end against him as babyshit-soft researchers afraid of being canceled by gay race communism?
Apologies for the pedantics & if I missed something completely.
No surprise. I feel even more stupid for thinking back in 2012 that this infestation in colleges would run its course. I guess it’s always been there. I went to college on base with old crusty sergeants at night. Different environment for sure lol
studies and polls can ALWAYS be manipulated to tell a different story.
More and more people are realizing 'science' isn't totally objective... It's subjective. Because everyone wants their work to prove how smart they are...
"science" may not be objective but actual science is. Poor methodology and bias will ruin that objectivity.
Fundamentally, the questions scientists chose to ask are rooted in their beliefs; there is no such thing as "objective" science and we should be very wary of anyone who claims it.
Ok buddy whatever you say.
Humans have flaws like bias. Science is a process that is logically sound. True, repeatable science has no bias only error margins.
Well if you account for all the black babies aborted by white doctors it would be very accurate but I'm ok with that if blacks didn't kill their babies at current and previous numbers the black population would be double what it is right now. That's double the crime, double the welfare, double the fatigue.
At what point can we consider these people demonically possessed and belonging in prison at a minimum?
The beginning.
I'll always think of WKUK:
https://youtu.be/6D8izE40YFs?si=kOBaJq7DL8YY6eDW&t=50