Meet Jessica Foster: The viral OnlyFans AI fooling millions of MAGA fans
(www.euronews.com)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
This is the real purpose of the account and the article: creating a pathetic straw man for lefties to crow about.
It's also the celebration paradox:
Porn and degeneracy are completely acceptable, but when a perceived enemy does it we'll mock them for it.
Also sounds like leftist projection/deflection, since they're the ones more likely to fall for this type of scams.
Not really. Give her an adams apple and a 5 o'clock shadow though, and they would be helpless against it.
Nah, it's to get men into the military.
Its pretty common for the Donald to be boomer level "but boooobs" for a bunch of shit. Somehow its a conservative position to be into porn and whores and if you push back on sexualization of everything you're a leftist/gay/Muslim.
Once again I am asking the question: with so much free porn on the internet (with the capability to fine-tune to get your exact carnal desires) why are people paying for Onlyfans?
For the imitation of companionship. Most users know it's fake, either a chat bot or a chink on the other side, but they crave intimacy not offered by pornography
I'm surprised AI chatbots aren't starting to drain that pool of feeders from onlyfans..
I believe they will once normies wake up to the capability of the technology
As soon as the bots generate video and audio rather than just text, it's over for the OF whores.
AI chatbots still aren't really good enough to fool people above 90 IQ.
Lol when I went down the deepfake rabbit hole a couple months back, alot of the tutorials I found were for creating your own "personality's", because you could be held legally responsible for using someone else's image. But again ill add with so many people alive on this planet the chances of you generating a likeness to someone who actually exists is pretty high....
But I was left wtih the impression that many of these "personality's" are then used on social media or only fans....
So its prolly more than you think.
Can you send a message to your favourite porn actress and interact with her? If she has Onlyfans sure you can, that is why people pay but the fools don´t realise that she can´t reply to a thousand guys a day, she hires somebody to reply for her.
After cumming no, i don't really wanna talk to them.
I doubt a lot of people subscribed. The headline is fake and gay. This avatar has one million followers on Instagram but there's no evidence that it's funneling subscribers to its Onlyfans effectively.
Whoever made the model has good taste, though.
I will die on the hill that it is a money laundering scheme. Top girls are in on it and are the only ones that make money, everyone below them makes nothing and humiliates themselves and degrades themselves for nothing. Probably a bit of a propaganda machine as well.
Funneling money to AIPAC, I do know that is true. I also know the highest porn star on there got busted faking numbers a while back.
Regular porn simply doesn't cut it for them anymore. Hopeless hedonists, all of them.
Who tf can't tell that this is AI? Are there really so many boomers who haven't had their eyes checked in 25 years just sitting around in the internet? Fffffff
Never underestimate the stupidity of normies.
Bar levels reaching Basement 3.
This won't even fool the thirsty boomers, as there are no guns and Israeli flags!
Kek
I'm not a boomer and I thought the pics in the article were pretty convincing. Even knowing going in that they were AI.
The first thing I noticed was off was her sitting in the passenger side of what appears to be a right-sided drive truck. Obviously later on there are other more obvious clues like her taking selfies with Trump & Putin both together.
Yeah obviously posing at nonexistent political events and taking selfies with Trump is a pretty obvious giveaway lol. But I wouldn't have recognized most of the photos as AI on a compositing basis.
Yeah, the recognition of the nonexistent political events requires knowledge of context.
That's less of a test of a discriminating eye for AI deepfakes. And more of a barometer of being terminally online, a political/news junkie or simply a MSM journoscum enjoyer.
The article specifically talked about one of the clues/factual errors being that there's realistic photos of Foster speaking at a podium with "Board of Peace" branding with Trump behind her in the front row.
But it's still not explained what the obvious tell is. The Board of Peace was essentially an IRL Trump troll meme that was at the tail end of the Greenland annexation sabrerattling and is already long out of the newscycle.
It's asking a lot for even your average chud to actually know or care about these political nuances.
I feel like I have some super power then, there's just something about the lighting, shadowing, specular, even on the best AI images I can spot it right away. Similar to those chinese social media filters that makes them look like somebody else entirely, I can just spot it seemingly instinctively.
You probably do.
Nothing personal, but it's probably like the Jewdar thing where some claim they can tell with absolutely certainly who is a member of the tribe from physiognomy alone.
There's obviously a kernel of truth to it. And they are correct a lot of the time.
But they also are not infrequently wrong, but simply ignore their false positives. Ot simply scream crypto Jew.
Millions? The most-liked tweet in that article has 33 likes. I could get triple that by posting my morning shit.
Well spotted, I now realised her X account only has 350 followers, but she has a million followers in Instagram.
https://www.fastcompany.com/91507096/jessica-foster-popular-maga-influencer-ai-model
No one, with more than 2 braincells to rub together, uses Instagram. Problem being, there aren't many of those left.
Instagram has around 3 billion users Worldwide, correct.
As someone that uses AI often enough to fuck around and see what's possible, I can see the telltale marks of the subscription based model details, and the LoRas being used so that the background characters actually look real, as well as the depth of field and lighting effects.
Someone's paying to use some AI cluster for that. Local ones can do that level of detail, but it's manual inpainting and editing over and over.
They got sloppy a few times with some 'good enough' pics, and that set off the autism in some. Plus the blatant political stuff. They can actually come after you for that, it's not a good idea.
Anyone with 128gb vram could make something much better than we can with our piddly 12/24 gigs.
I see a lot of AI images like this posted on Facebook. And they usually have a crapload of likes. The problem of course becomes are they fooled or do they just like the image and how many of those likes are bots and fake accounts?
No soldier would be caught dead (and would likely spend the rest of their career cleaning toilets with broken tooth brush) in the white house not in dress uniform. And that was just the first thing I saw after the page loaded. Even the slightest cursory investigation showed even most of the insta comments are bots, likely Indian.
Oh, and the Instagram is deleted now.
And I can't help but notice the complete lack of comments when even the most boring article has at least one.
Lol at the first (and only?) "journalist" being quoted as concerntrolling in the article was Kat Tenbarge. Kek.