Meet Jessica Foster: The viral OnlyFans AI fooling millions of MAGA fans
(www.euronews.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
I'm not a boomer and I thought the pics in the article were pretty convincing. Even knowing going in that they were AI.
The first thing I noticed was off was her sitting in the passenger side of what appears to be a right-sided drive truck. Obviously later on there are other more obvious clues like her taking selfies with Trump & Putin both together.
Yeah obviously posing at nonexistent political events and taking selfies with Trump is a pretty obvious giveaway lol. But I wouldn't have recognized most of the photos as AI on a compositing basis.
Yeah, the recognition of the nonexistent political events requires knowledge of context.
That's less of a test of a discriminating eye for AI deepfakes. And more of a barometer of being terminally online, a political/news junkie or simply a MSM journoscum enjoyer.
The article specifically talked about one of the clues/factual errors being that there's realistic photos of Foster speaking at a podium with "Board of Peace" branding with Trump behind her in the front row.
But it's still not explained what the obvious tell is. The Board of Peace was essentially an IRL Trump troll meme that was at the tail end of the Greenland annexation sabrerattling and is already long out of the newscycle.
It's asking a lot for even your average chud to actually know or care about these political nuances.
I feel like I have some super power then, there's just something about the lighting, shadowing, specular, even on the best AI images I can spot it right away. Similar to those chinese social media filters that makes them look like somebody else entirely, I can just spot it seemingly instinctively.
You probably do.
Nothing personal, but it's probably like the Jewdar thing where some claim they can tell with absolutely certainly who is a member of the tribe from physiognomy alone.
There's obviously a kernel of truth to it. And they are correct a lot of the time.
But they also are not infrequently wrong, but simply ignore their false positives. Ot simply scream crypto Jew.