I don't recommend wasting your time with this video but it got a click from me due to the title "Charlie Kirk's family expose Erika BAD." After a minute of listening to this guy ramble he was obviously padding time, so I skipped ahead. I didn't get to the actual content until around 16-17 minutes in.
After finally arriving, I discover the source is a fake article posted by someone who didn't even try to fake a real name. So in the end, that's the pumpkin that this guy tried to turn into a 28-minute coach.
Does it really bother me that a grifter is latching onto a controversial event? Not really. The official story of the assassination is obviously full of holes, and people are going to take advantage, et cetera. The nagging annoyance is that the audience just eats this stuff up. I suppose reflexive skepticism is better than nothing, but if you can't exercise this level of due diligence, I have some doubts about your right to vote.
I just saw this happen with a fairly good conspiracy youtuber who posted an 4chan expose of Epstein from his personal driver that was clearly written by a random guy on 4chan. You truly can't trust anyone.
The problem is that with the release of Epstein files and just the time we are in that things are getting declassified, A LOT of old conspiracies are turning out, if not true, to have a lot of grounded evidence supporting it (Elites part of satanic child abuse/sacrifice cults).
Now, because we have so much attention on this, grifters have latched on, muddying the waters for attention.
I think it's because the Jews and the establishment are aggressively and openly taking over the world and the society is siding with them. (Well, the "new" thing is that they are aggressively moving, and moving fast, and in the public eye unashamedly. They've always been slowly taking over everything). They think they can't lose so they're just bragging and flexing how much they can get away with without consequence
Epstein files just another flex. Doesn't matter if it's all true or not at this point - You're right about the timing. Relatively zero care or interest from the wider public, or it will be forgotten in a heartbeat the next series of world events happen
I also about the news "cycle". Nothing ever gets solved because no one can focus on any one thing long enough to solve it.
Did we ever build the wall to keep out illegals? No, because the Epstein Files came out.
Will anyone important be taken down by the Epstein Files? No, because we're mad about Somalians in Minnesota.
100% exactly
I'm willing to bet we've been keeping aliens on earth and offering them ice cream and porn for decades.
Grey aliens are real and have been using plastic surgery and anime to normalize their skull shape and ease their introduction to human society.
This explains Mark Kelly.
The slop effect
It's definitely a big problem after one gets redpilled that official sources, the media, the government, academia, etc are all bad faith actors that can't be trusted.
It creates a deracinated environment where there really is no empirical truth, very little ability to factcheck, few online sources that can be counted on to exist in perpetuity, etc.
It really makes it easy to get sucked in by sensational claims that conveniently conform to one's preexisting beliefs & narratives. Without easy ways to vet veracity even if one is so inclined.
There's also the frantic churn of the online newscycle. Stories, no matter how salacious, rarely remain topical past a few days.
This is also what irks me. There are so many issues and likely scenarios and they're pushed to the back by grifters grifting
For every real journalist there is probably at least one grifter farming views, and at least one intelligence operative posing as a grifter to flood the discussion with noise.