I don't recommend wasting your time with this video but it got a click from me due to the title "Charlie Kirk's family expose Erika BAD." After a minute of listening to this guy ramble he was obviously padding time, so I skipped ahead. I didn't get to the actual content until around 16-17 minutes in.

After finally arriving, I discover the source is a fake article posted by someone who didn't even try to fake a real name. So in the end, that's the pumpkin that this guy tried to turn into a 28-minute coach.

Does it really bother me that a grifter is latching onto a controversial event? Not really. The official story of the assassination is obviously full of holes, and people are going to take advantage, et cetera. The nagging annoyance is that the audience just eats this stuff up. I suppose reflexive skepticism is better than nothing, but if you can't exercise this level of due diligence, I have some doubts about your right to vote.

I just saw this happen with a fairly good conspiracy youtuber who posted an 4chan expose of Epstein from his personal driver that was clearly written by a random guy on 4chan. You truly can't trust anyone.