Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

48
Jury Awards $4M For Malpractice In Gender Surgery, A Huge Win For Sanity (archive.is)
posted 121 days ago by 5Cats 121 days ago by 5Cats +48 / -0
45 comments share
45 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (45)
sorted by:
▲ 22 ▼
– Ahaus667 22 points 121 days ago +22 / -0

This is bad. You have to understand that hospitals pay malpractice insurance, you’re essentially billing the consumers for the hospitals fuck ups. This will only make healthcare expenses worse and then government will step in and bail out the “too big to fail” hospital conglomerates. These hospitals won’t be allowed to fail in the capitalist model like they should. We need prison sentences, not fines.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– TheOutlaw 30 points 121 days ago +30 / -0

Not to mention the elephant in the room: The victim is female. The only reason we're getting any traction against the troons is because they made the mistake of biting the hand that feeds them.

We need prison sentences, not fines.

Death sentences are more appropriate.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– dagthegnome 17 points 121 days ago +17 / -0

Eye for an eye. Trans the doctors.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TheOutlaw 8 points 121 days ago +8 / -0

I like your thought process. The sentence should be getting transed with a suspended death sentence. The death sentence only stays suspended as long as they participate in the tranny dating scene.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 70thLike 1 point 121 days ago +1 / -0

They also have to give oral to trannies from both sexes, at least once a month.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– LinnocenceDeLame 3 points 121 days ago +3 / -0

No. Cruel treatments are forbidden by the constitution.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 70thLike 2 points 121 days ago +2 / -0

True, but this isn't cruel, according to their own beliefs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Benevolentdictator 12 points 121 days ago +12 / -0

Good point.

The sympathetic detransitioners propped off have all been young regretful women by my memory.

No pity or justice for the chipdick autists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– 5Cats [S] 13 points 121 days ago +13 / -0

Yes BUT this was civil court, no jail time can be given. It opens the doors to actual criminal trials though, giving precedent, hopefully.
4M is chickenfeed, but the threat of many more cases does make them nervous. This will hopefully put their crusade to mutilate children "on pause" at least temporarily. But probably not.
If it gets bad enough, the insurance Cos will yank coverage, THAT will slow them down!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Ahaus667 10 points 121 days ago +10 / -0

Civil court has a far lower bar of evidence and has been abused into absurdity. Insurance companies will spike premiums, which the government will bail out, or they will drop selected coverages which the government will bail out. Gender surgeries were not included on malpractice insurance policies until the government stepped in. Anything involving the judiciary or litigation have been corrupt for nearly a century now, they’re not going to magically this change when they can pass the bill to the taxpayers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– LinnocenceDeLame 10 points 121 days ago +10 / -0

This will only make healthcare expenses worse

To be fair, everything will make healthcare expenses worse.

Instead of increasing 60% this year, healthcare might increase 61% to account for higher insurance. Oh noes!

I'm not in the US but I could never afford health insurance in the US anyway. I know people paying $1000 per month for healthcare insurance. Not for services (they'd have to pay a deductible/etc), just for insurance.

$1000 is my entire budget for the entire month, everything included.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ItLivesInTheWind 5 points 121 days ago +5 / -0

Taken far enough, precedents will make the types of procedures uninsurable. Hospitals will stop pushing their doctors to do them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Ahaus667 3 points 121 days ago +3 / -0

No, the state governments in blue states will fund it with federal tax dollars. Then republicans will cuck and judges will rule coverage mandates

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 3 points 121 days ago +3 / -0

It's too late to care about this, health care is so expensive it makes no sense already. Health insurance costs at least $500/mo, whether it's you, your employer, or the government paying for it. There are 3 doctors per 1000 people. Do the math, that's $2M per doctor per year BEFORE anyone ever gets a bill.

There's never going to be a 95% reduction in this fraud by calm and calculated measures. Just pile it on because it isn't real. Piss into the ocean of piss. Hope the damn breaks.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ahaus667 1 point 120 days ago +1 / -0

Your math is horrible. Let’s start with reality, healthcare pays over 20 billion a year adjusting to new healthcare regulations from the government each year. There’s then 5 administrative personnel for each doctor for existing regulations. On top of that there’s 100s of other forced jobs by the government like patient advocates. Then you have the revolving door of networks which changes yearly on which doctors they cover. Oh and don’t forget Medicare and Medicaid which forces the doctors/hospitals to take less money and operate at a loss. Then there the corrupt regulations that force hospitals to buy new equipment before they even pay off old equipment. Hospitals are conglomerating just to keep above water because the entire system is designed fraud by government regulation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 1 point 120 days ago +1 / -0

Are you agreeing or disagreeing with me?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ahaus667 1 point 120 days ago +1 / -0

The only thing your “solution” will do is add more government regulation, if you want more imported Indian “doctors”, mega conglomerates, and 500 dollar PCP visits be my guest. No matter how bad you think it is now it’s nowhere near how bad it will get, for decades, before the system breaks, if it does as at all.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 1 point 120 days ago +1 / -0

Your solution is to let psychopaths cut kid's genitals off because fighting against it might make a bad number go from 20 billion to 20 billion and one. You can work your whole life and you'll never remove even one medical regulation. These things don't get dialed back. They collapse. That's how it works.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ahaus667 1 point 120 days ago +1 / -0

Your solution is to let psychopaths cut kid's genitals off because fighting against it might make a bad number go from 20 billion to 20 billion and one.

If you think civil suits will stop this you’re beyond discourse.

You can work your whole life and you'll never remove even one medical regulation. These things don't get dialed back. They collapse. That's how it works.

How did that work for roe?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– 5Cats [S] 17 points 121 days ago +17 / -0

Without Trump in office? This never would have happened.
There's still endless appeals & so forth, but it's a first step!

NOTE: she was 16 at the time they chopped her breasts off. They prey on children, it was always like this, it was their goal from the beginning.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– LinnocenceDeLame 11 points 121 days ago +11 / -0

NOTE: she was 16 at the time they chopped her breasts off.

I genuinely believe surgeons get an erection from doing this surgery. It's a weird fetish thing. If you know surgeons, they're already pretty weird lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– PooperSnooperPrime 6 points 121 days ago +6 / -0

Some probably do fetishise it. There's also the knowledge that you are pretty much tethering that person to ongoing medical care for the rest of their life, meaning a predictable income stream, and a ongoing benefit to yourself as a result.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 2 points 120 days ago +2 / -0

Always follow the money

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 70thLike 1 point 121 days ago +1 / -0

The entire industry, and participants, around transgenderism, is one giant fetish. I'm sure a very small portion are only there for the money, but the vast, overwhelming majority, are getting off on it. Including the BPD moms with transhausen syndrome.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 7 points 121 days ago +7 / -0

Gender affirming care on minors? That NEVER happens!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Ricky_CIA 7 points 121 days ago +7 / -0

click whirrrrrrr ca-chunk

REEEEEEEEEEEE it happens all the time and it's a good thing you BIGOT!!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– NiggerWithAForklift 1 point 120 days ago +1 / -0

gender affirming care

I prefer transsexual surgery

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TCDforver 5 points 121 days ago +5 / -0

16 isn't a child you intellectually dishonest cunt. She mutilated herself for her sexual fetishes and then regretted it. by the same metric anyone who gets a tattoo or a piercing should have the right to sue whoever gave it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 8 points 121 days ago +8 / -0

16 isn't a child

You sound familiar. Do you also happen to believe that marrying children, I'm sorry, NOT children according to you, is a good thing?

by the same metric anyone who gets a tattoo or a piercing should have the right to sue whoever gave it.

Correct. If I am transabled and a 'doctor' chops off my hand because I'm delusional, should I not have the right to sue him if I ever return to being (relatively) sound of mind?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TCDforver 6 points 121 days ago +6 / -0

You sound familiar. Do you also happen to believe that marrying children, I'm sorry, NOT children according to you, is a good thing?

Do you think them whoring around before they're even legal is a good thing? I'd rather the age of consent be lowed to the point where girls are becoming sexually active rather than having a system that ensures nearly all women lose their virginity before even hitting the legal market.

Correct. If I am transabled and a 'doctor' chops off my hand because I'm delusional, should I not have the right to sue him if I ever return to being (relatively) sound of mind?

That's absolutely retarded.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 5 points 121 days ago +5 / -0

I'd rather the age of consent be lowed

You're trying new ways of ban evasion, but you'll never deny that this is what you want.

That's absolutely retarded.

That's retarded, and pedophilia is good.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TCDforver 4 points 121 days ago +4 / -0

What ban evasion? Am I not allowed to express a desire that the specifics of a law be slightly tweaked?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 5Cats [S] 3 points 121 days ago +3 / -0

In Canada the AoC was 14 for a long time. The NDP Party wanted to lower it to 12. Well, their super-famous "first gay MP" did & they didn't immediately kick him out.
It didn't "help" anything except paedophiles. When the Conservatives finally raised to to 18 (effectively, 16 at a minimum) the Liberal Senate blocked it for 9 months... even the CBC was disgusted by that.

Kids can have sex with other kids, it's the adults who the AoC applies to. So long as there was no authority, money or booze involved? A 60 year-old could bang a boy or girl after their 14th birthday. Perfectly legal back then, thanks to the Liberal Party of course 😡 Oh, giving them pot was OK said some liberal judge...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TCDforver 3 points 121 days ago +3 / -0

Kids can have sex with other kids

that is my whole fucking problem with it

it makes it so that men who missed out on sex in their teenage years CAN NEVER EXPERIENCE YOUNG LOVE AND ARE FOREVER BEHIND OUR PEERS

it's the adults who the AoC applies to. So long as there was no authority, money or booze involved? A 60 year-old could bang a boy or girl after their 14th birthday. Perfectly legal back then, thanks to the Liberal Party of course 😡

And? That's better than the shitty system we have now where men like me are expected to settle for old used up whores rather than experiencing love with someone equally innocent.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats [S] 1 point 119 days ago +1 / -0

Oh, AoV was right, you're a paedophile. My mistake for thinking you were human.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TCDforver 2 points 119 days ago +2 / -0

Wanting a universal age of consent does not make me a pedophile. if anything I am MORE against minors having sex than most people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 121 days ago +2 / -0

FYI, you're talking to the guy called 'Pedo Pajeet'.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 5Cats [S] 2 points 119 days ago +2 / -0

Ah, I suddenly see that in his latest comment.
Thanks for the 'heads up' eh?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 12 points 121 days ago +12 / -0

A very small win, like OJ losing the civil lawsuit to the family of those two he definitely didn't kill.

The jurors found that in many respects the surgeon and psychologist had skipped important steps when evaluating if she should go forward with the surgery and had not adequately communicated with each other. These missteps were a “departure from the standard of care,” they decided.

The problem is that 'the standard of care' is totally messed up too. So these people slipped up by not covering their ass enough.

The moderate position is life in prison for these 'doctors'.

Not to blackpill. This is clearly an advance compared to the previous nonsense that was going on.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Ricky_CIA 6 points 121 days ago +6 / -0

Appeal filing: "But we mutilated a 16 year old girl to pwn the chuds!"

Appellate judge: "Case dismissed!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– subbookkeeper 5 points 121 days ago +5 / -0

Hopefully this spikes malpractice insurance on mutilation surgeries alone and not all surgeries.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 5Cats [S] 2 points 121 days ago +2 / -0

It will be specific to this kind of surgery, there's already a wide range of lawsuits for nearly everything else, eh? Some legit, others not so much.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– tralbolh 3 points 121 days ago +3 / -0

Is this the same one as the 2 million suit in New York, or different.

Archive ink didn't work for me. Endless captchas.

https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/1ARws6r3oG/1st-detransitioner-to-take-a-med/c

Hopefully these former kids can sue the parent who signed the forms as well. May seem pointless, but the parent apparently cares not for posterity and likely would have left a their money to a communist cause of some kind.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 5Cats [S] 3 points 121 days ago +3 / -0

Indeed it is the same case.
The initial $2M was damages, then came "...with $1.6 million for past and future pain and suffering, and another $400,000 for future medical expenses." So now it's 4M total.

The Mom is saying that she opposed it back then, but was afraid the kid would commit suicide, something she says the psychiatrist reinforced. :/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 70thLike 2 points 121 days ago +2 / -0

I'd call that a small win. A huge win would be a video of the death penalty being carried out on the psychopaths that hurt that person.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy