16 isn't a child you intellectually dishonest cunt. She mutilated herself for her sexual fetishes and then regretted it. by the same metric anyone who gets a tattoo or a piercing should have the right to sue whoever gave it.
You sound familiar. Do you also happen to believe that marrying children, I'm sorry, NOT children according to you, is a good thing?
by the same metric anyone who gets a tattoo or a piercing should have the right to sue whoever gave it.
Correct. If I am transabled and a 'doctor' chops off my hand because I'm delusional, should I not have the right to sue him if I ever return to being (relatively) sound of mind?
You sound familiar. Do you also happen to believe that marrying children, I'm sorry, NOT children according to you, is a good thing?
Do you think them whoring around before they're even legal is a good thing? I'd rather the age of consent be lowed to the point where girls are becoming sexually active rather than having a system that ensures nearly all women lose their virginity before even hitting the legal market.
Correct. If I am transabled and a 'doctor' chops off my hand because I'm delusional, should I not have the right to sue him if I ever return to being (relatively) sound of mind?
In Canada the AoC was 14 for a long time. The NDP Party wanted to lower it to 12. Well, their super-famous "first gay MP" did & they didn't immediately kick him out.
It didn't "help" anything except paedophiles. When the Conservatives finally raised to to 18 (effectively, 16 at a minimum) the Liberal Senate blocked it for 9 months... even the CBC was disgusted by that.
Kids can have sex with other kids, it's the adults who the AoC applies to. So long as there was no authority, money or booze involved? A 60 year-old could bang a boy or girl after their 14th birthday. Perfectly legal back then, thanks to the Liberal Party of course 😡 Oh, giving them pot was OK said some liberal judge...
it makes it so that men who missed out on sex in their teenage years CAN NEVER EXPERIENCE YOUNG LOVE AND ARE FOREVER BEHIND OUR PEERS
it's the adults who the AoC applies to. So long as there was no authority, money or booze involved? A 60 year-old could bang a boy or girl after their 14th birthday. Perfectly legal back then, thanks to the Liberal Party of course 😡
And? That's better than the shitty system we have now where men like me are expected to settle for old used up whores rather than experiencing love with someone equally innocent.
16 isn't a child you intellectually dishonest cunt. She mutilated herself for her sexual fetishes and then regretted it. by the same metric anyone who gets a tattoo or a piercing should have the right to sue whoever gave it.
You sound familiar. Do you also happen to believe that marrying children, I'm sorry, NOT children according to you, is a good thing?
Correct. If I am transabled and a 'doctor' chops off my hand because I'm delusional, should I not have the right to sue him if I ever return to being (relatively) sound of mind?
Do you think them whoring around before they're even legal is a good thing? I'd rather the age of consent be lowed to the point where girls are becoming sexually active rather than having a system that ensures nearly all women lose their virginity before even hitting the legal market.
That's absolutely retarded.
You're trying new ways of ban evasion, but you'll never deny that this is what you want.
That's retarded, and pedophilia is good.
What ban evasion? Am I not allowed to express a desire that the specifics of a law be slightly tweaked?
In Canada the AoC was 14 for a long time. The NDP Party wanted to lower it to 12. Well, their super-famous "first gay MP" did & they didn't immediately kick him out.
It didn't "help" anything except paedophiles. When the Conservatives finally raised to to 18 (effectively, 16 at a minimum) the Liberal Senate blocked it for 9 months... even the CBC was disgusted by that.
Kids can have sex with other kids, it's the adults who the AoC applies to. So long as there was no authority, money or booze involved? A 60 year-old could bang a boy or girl after their 14th birthday. Perfectly legal back then, thanks to the Liberal Party of course 😡 Oh, giving them pot was OK said some liberal judge...
that is my whole fucking problem with it
it makes it so that men who missed out on sex in their teenage years CAN NEVER EXPERIENCE YOUNG LOVE AND ARE FOREVER BEHIND OUR PEERS
And? That's better than the shitty system we have now where men like me are expected to settle for old used up whores rather than experiencing love with someone equally innocent.
FYI, you're talking to the guy called 'Pedo Pajeet'.