A 10:1 ratio of content submissions to publishable and workable end-product isn't really that good at all. If you think about it, Games Done Quick, the original thing this is spun from, every speedrun is an application of content. It's a 10000:1 ratio. Most employers nowadays get a 1000:1 ratio of initial resume submissions to final employee hires.
A bunch of people kept yelling “Waaaaaaa” whenever anything happened and a guy got on the microphone and told them to kill themselves. He was then kicked out
There was that knitting lady. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnsugv_VViI who literally interrupted the runner to trauma dump. Fuck my life.. 12 years ago.... Her grandmother passed of cancer a few years ago and had to immediately make that about herself and her concern about inheriting that cancer gene... something that pretty much gets all of us in so many flavors.
Funny, the only "rights" they're lacking revolve around male trannies wanting to be in female bathrooms, changing rooms, showers, and sports. With everything else the rainbow people get preferential treatment, or equal treatment, at worst.
Another example of a journalist hyping up an obscure criterion that has no objective frame of measurement for most people. If this event actually had steam I think they would be bragging about something more substantial than how many homos submitted playthroughs of Nintendo games (which they do ANYWAY)
"I know GDQ was created for people speedrunning games as fast as possible, but what i really care about is what the participants like to have sex with."
Journalist uses numbers to try to make a political point. Yawn.
Hot take: we probably shouldn't reject gays in the gaming industry so quickly even though we know the lifestyle is unhealthy and it damages society etc.
There a huge overlap between gays and programmers. Maybe is has something to do with autism, idk, but from my few years trying gamedev I've found that there are helpful resources and guides thanks to gays and Indians. Usually I would hate these groups lol but we gotta recognize their positive contributions.
Also, there are some gays who do not make their deplorable lifestyle the center focus of their personality and all their decisions (believe it or not lol), and we shouldn't discourage them for something unrelated or else we'd kinda be doing the same thing the annoying gays do, making sexual identity the main focus of decisions.
The problem is the gays that ruin everything outnumber the normal gays, so they both have to go. It's like how the military punishes everyone if one person screws up, eventually they will self police themselves.
If they are the majority, than they ARE the "normal gays" lol
Also, perhaps many of the programmers I'm talking about ARE the faggots who ruin everything and make it their personality. I hate it too but I just ignore it when they're useful.
Simply put: if straight White men weren't rejected or kicked out of so many communities en masse, any contribution from faggots would be very well covered by SWM.
Yeah you're probably right. But my point still stands that bitching about it when they are not making it relevant would be hypocritically doing the exact same thing we hate most about them. We hate that gays make gross buttsex the center of their personality and everything that they do so its normal to reject something queer once it's been made prominent and relevant (like them making art about their weird lifestyle). But when one isn't a flaming weirdo, it makes no sense to give their faggotry relevance and bring up their gross buttsex for no fucking reason other than our hatred of the act, when it isn't relevant to the situation in any way.
Art isn't bad just because it was made by a woman or someone not white. Its just worse.
A 10:1 ratio of content submissions to publishable and workable end-product isn't really that good at all. If you think about it, Games Done Quick, the original thing this is spun from, every speedrun is an application of content. It's a 10000:1 ratio. Most employers nowadays get a 1000:1 ratio of initial resume submissions to final employee hires.
Ironically, the gays have MORE rights if we ignore the ones advocating for them..
To GDQ, "I would really prefer if you would be quiet."
I do miss GDQ. I don't know what happened to it in recent years, but it gave some of the the best unhinged content ever back in the day.
Infiltration and subversion happened, like what happens to every institution that doesn't gatekeep jews and leftists from it.
Outside of I prefer if you be quite and the guy telling the waluigis to shut up, what else?
Cody Miller's speedrun of Halo in 2010 is quite the laugh. Went about 3 hours over the estimation and outed Cody as a fraud.
waluigis?
A bunch of people kept yelling “Waaaaaaa” whenever anything happened and a guy got on the microphone and told them to kill themselves. He was then kicked out
please tell me there's video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_CQA14xFF4
based
There was that knitting lady. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnsugv_VViI who literally interrupted the runner to trauma dump. Fuck my life.. 12 years ago.... Her grandmother passed of cancer a few years ago and had to immediately make that about herself and her concern about inheriting that cancer gene... something that pretty much gets all of us in so many flavors.
Well you see they thought that if they had a larger percentage of the submitted content that they would get represented properly based upon that.
The opposite of what they think about biological everyday life, but in this case - that's exactly how it should work.
So, morbidly obese faggots taking breaks from videogames to dilate for 450 hours.
How does this differ from literally all of the rest of GDQ?
Funny, the only "rights" they're lacking revolve around male trannies wanting to be in female bathrooms, changing rooms, showers, and sports. With everything else the rainbow people get preferential treatment, or equal treatment, at worst.
And it was probably all shit and/or copied from others.
Another example of a journalist hyping up an obscure criterion that has no objective frame of measurement for most people. If this event actually had steam I think they would be bragging about something more substantial than how many homos submitted playthroughs of Nintendo games (which they do ANYWAY)
Dongs Gone Quick is still going? Well it was all about money laundering anyway with massive donations on the final day right?
KEK
"I know GDQ was created for people speedrunning games as fast as possible, but what i really care about is what the participants like to have sex with."
Autism co-morbidity. Honestly, speedrunning should be listed a symptom in the DSM.
That faggot event is insufferable even before it went woke
i don't want to imagine the smell
Journalist uses numbers to try to make a political point. Yawn.
Hot take: we probably shouldn't reject gays in the gaming industry so quickly even though we know the lifestyle is unhealthy and it damages society etc.
There a huge overlap between gays and programmers. Maybe is has something to do with autism, idk, but from my few years trying gamedev I've found that there are helpful resources and guides thanks to gays and Indians. Usually I would hate these groups lol but we gotta recognize their positive contributions.
Also, there are some gays who do not make their deplorable lifestyle the center focus of their personality and all their decisions (believe it or not lol), and we shouldn't discourage them for something unrelated or else we'd kinda be doing the same thing the annoying gays do, making sexual identity the main focus of decisions.
The problem is the gays that ruin everything outnumber the normal gays, so they both have to go. It's like how the military punishes everyone if one person screws up, eventually they will self police themselves.
If they are the majority, than they ARE the "normal gays" lol
Also, perhaps many of the programmers I'm talking about ARE the faggots who ruin everything and make it their personality. I hate it too but I just ignore it when they're useful.
If you get rejected enough, you take what you can get.
What a terrible, Liberal view of the situation.
Simply put: if straight White men weren't rejected or kicked out of so many communities en masse, any contribution from faggots would be very well covered by SWM.
What is SWM?
Straight White Males.
Yeah you're probably right. But my point still stands that bitching about it when they are not making it relevant would be hypocritically doing the exact same thing we hate most about them. We hate that gays make gross buttsex the center of their personality and everything that they do so its normal to reject something queer once it's been made prominent and relevant (like them making art about their weird lifestyle). But when one isn't a flaming weirdo, it makes no sense to give their faggotry relevance and bring up their gross buttsex for no fucking reason other than our hatred of the act, when it isn't relevant to the situation in any way.
Art isn't bad just because it was made by a woman or someone not white. Its just worse.