Educational background is really irrelevant in this case. The primary job of the police is not and never has been to protect the public. It has always been to enforce public order and it's the government who defines what public order is. It's a systemic issue.
Police departments are full of the power hungry, cowards and retards all of whom are primarily interested in keeping their pensions. Those who want to serve and protect the public and are principled enough to actually do so usually don't last long or fight a life-long uphill battle against the gang they're a part of, a battle they can't possibly win as the government is the boss of the gang.
If you look at governments that violently crack down on their own people if there is someone who tries to protect the people it's usually the military. The police are almost always the ones who are doing the cracking down. I honestly can't think of an example where the police fought against the military to protect the people but I know of plenty where the military started to protect the people from the police. If I'm not mistaken Bangladesh is one of the recent examples of that happening.
It's not even as complicated as "enforce public order." Their order of operations stops at : "End the complaint." Every logic loop loops back around to what will stop them having to do anything at all, as quickly as possible.
Any attempts to introduce such concepts as "rights" or "who is really wrong here" simply introduces confusion, which in lower-IQ individuals, naturally results in anger.
Today's college graduates are not smart or impressive people. In a lot of "disciplines," they're merely taught to regurgitate what they were told. Exactly what they want in law enforcement.
Even more retarded is that the guy he was mistaken for was originally trespassed for sleeping on the property.
They went through all that effort to remove the wrong person, who was already leaving. Who, even if he had been the guy they thought he was, would have been already leaving and clearly not sleeping on the property.
There wasn't any reason to even stop him at that point other than as a stronger deterrent against sleeping on the property (which he wasn't doing) in the future.
When casinos invest all those resources into security, the mall cops are going to go out of their way to bigtime situations to justify their own existence.
Example 6,454,343,543 that ACAB. There are good ones, but very few. Sometimes the bad ones don't behave badly, but they are still assholes with a badge and a gun
Example 6,454,343,543 that ACAB. There are good ones, but very few.
Perfect example of why they even bother to keep these serpico wannabes around. Those 'good ones' know all about their corrupt colleagues but look the other way and they make a great pr shield.
This is the biggest risk with AI, not the tool in of itself but the people using the tool thinking they no longer require any critical thinking by using it.
They're lazy in a bad way that actually harms society and innovation.
If he was black this would be national news. They'd use it to claim that AI is racist against blacks. More """oppression"""
Eventually, it will happen to a black man and mark my words, it will be national news and nobody will ever mention that the same thing happened to a white guy.
Bonus: the black dude will make the situation 10x worse by chimping out.
That’ll be the same outcome if/when we get social credit scores. The pitch will be “you can live in a cleaner city because the AI will spot people throwing trash on the ground and lower their score!”
The reality will be that blacks have dogshit scores so corporations will stop policing them in the name of “equity” and they’ll keep on littering (and everything else) while whites are hyper-policed.
Forget orwellian, I feel like Terry Gilliam was closer to the mark at this point.
The dystopian movie brazil ?
The very same! 'They switched back to metric without telling us' is a common joke in my work
Fuck the police
Reminder that police departments started choosing against college graduates back in the 90s, and started implementing "community policing."
Educational background is really irrelevant in this case. The primary job of the police is not and never has been to protect the public. It has always been to enforce public order and it's the government who defines what public order is. It's a systemic issue.
Police departments are full of the power hungry, cowards and retards all of whom are primarily interested in keeping their pensions. Those who want to serve and protect the public and are principled enough to actually do so usually don't last long or fight a life-long uphill battle against the gang they're a part of, a battle they can't possibly win as the government is the boss of the gang.
If you look at governments that violently crack down on their own people if there is someone who tries to protect the people it's usually the military. The police are almost always the ones who are doing the cracking down. I honestly can't think of an example where the police fought against the military to protect the people but I know of plenty where the military started to protect the people from the police. If I'm not mistaken Bangladesh is one of the recent examples of that happening.
It's not even as complicated as "enforce public order." Their order of operations stops at : "End the complaint." Every logic loop loops back around to what will stop them having to do anything at all, as quickly as possible.
Any attempts to introduce such concepts as "rights" or "who is really wrong here" simply introduces confusion, which in lower-IQ individuals, naturally results in anger.
Not like Current Year college grads would make things any better.
No, the police now are majority ex-military. We're the enemy in their minds.
That wouldn't even matter today.
Today's college graduates are not smart or impressive people. In a lot of "disciplines," they're merely taught to regurgitate what they were told. Exactly what they want in law enforcement.
All that to trespass a guy leaving the casino. Seems like a waste of time, money, and energy.
Even more retarded is that the guy he was mistaken for was originally trespassed for sleeping on the property.
They went through all that effort to remove the wrong person, who was already leaving. Who, even if he had been the guy they thought he was, would have been already leaving and clearly not sleeping on the property.
There wasn't any reason to even stop him at that point other than as a stronger deterrent against sleeping on the property (which he wasn't doing) in the future.
When casinos invest all those resources into security, the mall cops are going to go out of their way to bigtime situations to justify their own existence.
The first trespass is being kicked out with paperwork.
The second is a felony.
That's what they were trying to get him for.
Example 6,454,343,543 that ACAB. There are good ones, but very few. Sometimes the bad ones don't behave badly, but they are still assholes with a badge and a gun
Perfect example of why they even bother to keep these serpico wannabes around. Those 'good ones' know all about their corrupt colleagues but look the other way and they make a great pr shield.
This is the biggest risk with AI, not the tool in of itself but the people using the tool thinking they no longer require any critical thinking by using it.
They're lazy in a bad way that actually harms society and innovation.
Why would critical thinking benefit? He has a job to to, the AI tells him to do the job, he does the job so his performance metrics go up.
Hope the guy sues the casino for wrongful imprisonment. A bunch of mall "cops" detained an innocent man.
He should sue the local cops and the vendor of the AI system while he's at it.
The courts are under the same control.
Makes sense, they're selected at 70IQ or below.
If he was black this would be national news. They'd use it to claim that AI is racist against blacks. More """oppression"""
Eventually, it will happen to a black man and mark my words, it will be national news and nobody will ever mention that the same thing happened to a white guy.
Bonus: the black dude will make the situation 10x worse by chimping out.
Then the AI will be "modified" to actively discriminate against Whites - as it already does in the trolley problem.
Look up who owns OpenAI.
That’ll be the same outcome if/when we get social credit scores. The pitch will be “you can live in a cleaner city because the AI will spot people throwing trash on the ground and lower their score!”
The reality will be that blacks have dogshit scores so corporations will stop policing them in the name of “equity” and they’ll keep on littering (and everything else) while whites are hyper-policed.
Essentially yes. As it has been with the worst psyop of the past century, the collective White race will be treated as the Kapparot chicken.
Idiocracy
This way he gets to add to his performance index and the fault is on the tools not him, why would you expect any differently?
I suppose this is how society will function when we're all replaced by 70 IQ browns.
“100% match! that’s more than identical twins!!”