Ironically, some of that is location as you can live in can be TOO good.
Look at Africa, it looks quite barren in places. But put in White people who had to for generations farm in a harsher environment and it becomes a breadbasket.
The adversity and challenges you face over generations leads to natural development and a lot of these cultures never faced the same level of challenges.
That was native metal though, they didn't have to smelt it, and native iron is pretty soft. And it was in Greenland(which they occupied after the Norse had abandoned it, the Norse were there first, though they didn't occupy the same parts of the island until after the age of exploration) , so they didn't get it until some time after the European Viking age had already ended. I'm always surprised by how quickly hunter-gatherer type peoples take to working metal when they get it. The Sentinelese islanders apparently readily took to working it into spears and such when a steel ship wrecked off their coast.
But they did at least have decent boats, and developed a diet that gets enough vitamin C without eating any fruit. But you can't really expect a people that sparsely populated to develop much, they live in what would be post-apocalyptic conditions for most other cultures.
That's a theory a friend of mine has. Whites lived in colder climates so they faced evolutionary pressure to develop a higher IQ so they could survive the winter. Blacks and browns never evolved past rolling around in their own filth until whites made the mistake of trying to civilize them.
That and you and your clan have about a month or two of sitting on your asses playing your greatest hits and misses and how you can do better next time if you survive to next time.
Maybe the people don't want to be "developed". Funny how it's areas that are brown people with limited examples of the evils of colonialism and exploitation and they left's response is to imply there's still a problem with that.
I’ve met some Africans and am aware of others who say they were better off under British rule. Granted, the BBC or guardian won’t talk to them but I wonder how many agree with that sentiment. I feel like it’s a substantial number
Most Africans probably realize that they will be metaphorical slaves one way or another, so the choice between the stability of British rule or an insane Warlord/Dictator is pretty easy.
The only ones who would think otherwise are the ones fantasizing themselves as the Warlord or his lackey for evil purposes.
Planning ahead for winter requires complex long term thinking skills.
Also, you have to be emotionally stable and participate in society at all times. If you have a melty and run off into the wilderness in the tropics, you sleep on the ground and the tribe will find you tomorrow. If you do that in norway, the tribe might look for your bones in the spring.
I'm sure a sociology PhD candidate (who already calls they/themself "doctor") woul be willing to output 50+ pages of blather about "systemic racism and structural bigotry."
Colonialism is white. Shouldn't they be happy that they clearly show no signs of colonialism? No sturdy buildings, no roman-style sewage aquaducts, no permanency?
Corrugated cardboard and corrugated sheet metal is from the white man, specifically Henry Robinson Palmer, who is more famous for having invented the far less useful elevated monorail train.
When life is easier to live due to an abundance of resources that don’t require industry to access, you don’t feel the need to develop your home unless forced to by outside forces.
Evolutionary pressures determine species advantages and adaptations.
In the tropical zones food is prevalent. The pressure is territory. You can have as many babies as you want because resources are plenty and environment is pleasant. The pressure becomes other tribes, so you develop higher aggression and short quick twitch muscles and your females develop more testosterone to aid in fighting.
In cold climates you have larger territories with sparse resources and the need to plan. You develop higher spatial awareness, long term planning and critical thinking skills, and cooperation within a tight knit small family group.
Hippocrates wrote about this issue more than 2000 years ago. "forward thinking" or "progressive" types of people have been stuggling to find a different explanation since then.
Colder climate and air is better for the brain activity and less diseases. And people need to learn how to plan ahead a lot, cant expect anything to grow in the winter, if you only live in the now like some africans do. Probably also less floods and other natural disasters.
Ironically, some of that is location as you can live in can be TOO good.
Look at Africa, it looks quite barren in places. But put in White people who had to for generations farm in a harsher environment and it becomes a breadbasket.
The adversity and challenges you face over generations leads to natural development and a lot of these cultures never faced the same level of challenges.
True. A year-round growing season is not such a blessing on a long enough timeline. It starts to impact your biology.
The argument is that the hospitable environment never created evolutionary pressure to move beyond nigger tier IQ.
What about inuits and eskimos and such?
They had metal cutlery made from meteorites and had at least better tech than the other tribes of both America and Africa.
They might be in TOO hostile an environment to develop but those fuckers took on POLAR BEARS and WON so can't knock them too much...
That was native metal though, they didn't have to smelt it, and native iron is pretty soft. And it was in Greenland(which they occupied after the Norse had abandoned it, the Norse were there first, though they didn't occupy the same parts of the island until after the age of exploration) , so they didn't get it until some time after the European Viking age had already ended. I'm always surprised by how quickly hunter-gatherer type peoples take to working metal when they get it. The Sentinelese islanders apparently readily took to working it into spears and such when a steel ship wrecked off their coast.
But they did at least have decent boats, and developed a diet that gets enough vitamin C without eating any fruit. But you can't really expect a people that sparsely populated to develop much, they live in what would be post-apocalyptic conditions for most other cultures.
Their evolution prioritized survival skills instead of intelligent planning. And they still aren't as retarded as the average subsaharan.
Edit to add: because intelligent planning wasn't really possible because agriculture wasn't possible.
You know, our brains got more developed when we introduced cooking over centuries...
That's a theory a friend of mine has. Whites lived in colder climates so they faced evolutionary pressure to develop a higher IQ so they could survive the winter. Blacks and browns never evolved past rolling around in their own filth until whites made the mistake of trying to civilize them.
That and you and your clan have about a month or two of sitting on your asses playing your greatest hits and misses and how you can do better next time if you survive to next time.
Considering we're several points more different than dogs are from coyotes...
Yes. They want something to blame on White men so they can continue the genocide with popular support.
Because white men who are 9% of the world population managed to oppress the other 91% of the world, totally makes sense with math...
Maybe the people don't want to be "developed". Funny how it's areas that are brown people with limited examples of the evils of colonialism and exploitation and they left's response is to imply there's still a problem with that.
I’ve met some Africans and am aware of others who say they were better off under British rule. Granted, the BBC or guardian won’t talk to them but I wonder how many agree with that sentiment. I feel like it’s a substantial number
Most Africans probably realize that they will be metaphorical slaves one way or another, so the choice between the stability of British rule or an insane Warlord/Dictator is pretty easy.
The only ones who would think otherwise are the ones fantasizing themselves as the Warlord or his lackey for evil purposes.
Very good point. Makes me think of Idi Amin. I’d take the British all day every day over him
They aren't swarming our borders to mass rape and murder Whites, and that results in too many White people.
Planning ahead for winter requires complex long term thinking skills.
Also, you have to be emotionally stable and participate in society at all times. If you have a melty and run off into the wilderness in the tropics, you sleep on the ground and the tribe will find you tomorrow. If you do that in norway, the tribe might look for your bones in the spring.
What did preddit conclude?
Wypipo’s fault?
Jaime pull up iq map overlay
Yes, but also no. What they want is for someone with Approved Credentials to confirm their existing blank slatist beliefs.
I'm sure a sociology PhD candidate (who already calls they/themself "doctor") woul be willing to output 50+ pages of blather about "systemic racism and structural bigotry."
Possibly AI assisted.
Dr. (Rosen|Ep|Krassen|Ein|Roth|Eis)(stein|berg|bard|blatt|ner)
Colonialism is white. Shouldn't they be happy that they clearly show no signs of colonialism? No sturdy buildings, no roman-style sewage aquaducts, no permanency?
Corrugated cardboard and corrugated sheet metal is from the white man, specifically Henry Robinson Palmer, who is more famous for having invented the far less useful elevated monorail train.
When life is easier to live due to an abundance of resources that don’t require industry to access, you don’t feel the need to develop your home unless forced to by outside forces.
Evolutionary pressures determine species advantages and adaptations.
In the tropical zones food is prevalent. The pressure is territory. You can have as many babies as you want because resources are plenty and environment is pleasant. The pressure becomes other tribes, so you develop higher aggression and short quick twitch muscles and your females develop more testosterone to aid in fighting.
In cold climates you have larger territories with sparse resources and the need to plan. You develop higher spatial awareness, long term planning and critical thinking skills, and cooperation within a tight knit small family group.
Hippocrates wrote about this issue more than 2000 years ago. "forward thinking" or "progressive" types of people have been stuggling to find a different explanation since then.
The answer is in the question.
Colder climate and air is better for the brain activity and less diseases. And people need to learn how to plan ahead a lot, cant expect anything to grow in the winter, if you only live in the now like some africans do. Probably also less floods and other natural disasters.