There is plenty of retarded stuff Trump does to shit on him over (the stuff in the OP included), but this is just leftoid-tier criticism. Tariffs have already been raised across the board. Just because he is repeatedly using threats of even higher tariffs as a negotiating tactic, doesn't mean it's for insider trading. Anyone who believes tariffs are good should appreciate the net positve of all the trade commotion this year. And if you don't believe in tariffs and think there should be zero barrier to goods made by slaves in the third world, that's a different conversation entirely. The more understandable criticism would be he should go harder and raise them even more on certain countries, but the counterpoint to that would be that gradual bumps are less of a shock.
I made out like a bandit earlier this year because I saw through his negotiating tactics and all the media panic over tariffs and invested accordingly. I can attest to you that I am not in Trump's inner circle, but I've certainly been accused of being weirder things on this board...
Just because he is repeatedly using threats of even higher tariffs as a negotiating tactic, doesn't mean it's for insider trading.
But it may be. Who knows? Just because leftists say it, doesn't mean it's automatically false. There's so much BS surrounding Trump, it's almost impossible to figure out what's true and what's false. Leftists may be cultists and assume everything negative about him is true, but do I also have to be a cultist and assume that it's false?
Sure, but I'm responding to someone who seems oh so certain that it must be for insider trading. If there was some insider trading going on, I wouldn't be shocked. It's certainly greater than a 0% chance, perhaps even over 25%. But given the competing explanations and weak circumstantial evidence, I see no reason to think it's more than that, but that can always change. And of course, rogue insider trading wouldn't immediately imply systemic, intentional, sanctioned insider trading. Which is what that user was clearly insinuating is happening.
There is plenty of retarded stuff Trump does to shit on him over (the stuff in the OP included), but this is just leftoid-tier criticism.
In case it wasn't clear I wasn't criticizing Trump for raising tariffs. I was calling him out for being blatantly corrupt. So if that is leftoid-tier criticism I have but one question. Does that logic only apply to Trump or to congress too? Trump ran his campaigns on draining the swamp. In his first term he didn't do anything. This time around he's only switched some of the swamp people out but hasn't actually touched the swamp itself. In some ways he's actually expanding it.
The part where you're implying he's negotiating the very public and whiplashing way that he does just so people close to him can insider trade is the leftoid tier criticism because it lacks basis in anything other than orange man bad.
Tariffs are only beneficial if they're in place long enough and stable enough to build up industry, otherwise the consumer is just getting indirectly taxed for things that have no domestic alternative
For certain things, absolutely. But for most products, it isn't like there are absolutely no American options, they are just being undercut by cheap foreign shit. But I definitely agree that the lion's share of benefit from tariffs are mid to long term, and I think it is unlikely much of that benefit would be realized before someone comes along and undoes them.
The problem is there is zero basis for it. It's reddit-tier filling in the blanks through the lens of orange man bad despite there being a more reasonable explanation.
There may be someone somewhere who catches wind of info ahead of time and uses it to insider trade. But absent that proof (and believe me if there was any, we'd have seen it), and proof it was intentionally allowed, I am left to assume that is just how Trump negotiates, which is an easy assumption to make because it is well in-line with how he has acted for a decade now.
The argument reminds me of the NO WAR FOR OIL! protests around the Iraq War. There were many reasons to be against that war, and hidden agendas for carrying it out, but 'we wanted to steal their oil' was the most inane astroturfed libdem take that distracted from legitimate opposition. Especially when as Trump pointed out we didn't even take the oil like we should have.
Nah its called basic reasoning. Pols all engage in corruption and trump is into shit like crypto crap and selling merch and shit. His family etc are definitely profiting from his presidency.
I don't need a SOOOOURCE to know they are making money with the political theater.
He’s not beating the allegations.
They are a cancer on our nation.
Everyone's, everywhere, every time.
And im getting sick of their antiWhitism
At least he's putting tariffs on countries so his inner circle can make a lot of profit on insider trading before he withdraws them again.
Reddit moment.
There is plenty of retarded stuff Trump does to shit on him over (the stuff in the OP included), but this is just leftoid-tier criticism. Tariffs have already been raised across the board. Just because he is repeatedly using threats of even higher tariffs as a negotiating tactic, doesn't mean it's for insider trading. Anyone who believes tariffs are good should appreciate the net positve of all the trade commotion this year. And if you don't believe in tariffs and think there should be zero barrier to goods made by slaves in the third world, that's a different conversation entirely. The more understandable criticism would be he should go harder and raise them even more on certain countries, but the counterpoint to that would be that gradual bumps are less of a shock.
I made out like a bandit earlier this year because I saw through his negotiating tactics and all the media panic over tariffs and invested accordingly. I can attest to you that I am not in Trump's inner circle, but I've certainly been accused of being weirder things on this board...
But it may be. Who knows? Just because leftists say it, doesn't mean it's automatically false. There's so much BS surrounding Trump, it's almost impossible to figure out what's true and what's false. Leftists may be cultists and assume everything negative about him is true, but do I also have to be a cultist and assume that it's false?
Sure, but I'm responding to someone who seems oh so certain that it must be for insider trading. If there was some insider trading going on, I wouldn't be shocked. It's certainly greater than a 0% chance, perhaps even over 25%. But given the competing explanations and weak circumstantial evidence, I see no reason to think it's more than that, but that can always change. And of course, rogue insider trading wouldn't immediately imply systemic, intentional, sanctioned insider trading. Which is what that user was clearly insinuating is happening.
In case it wasn't clear I wasn't criticizing Trump for raising tariffs. I was calling him out for being blatantly corrupt. So if that is leftoid-tier criticism I have but one question. Does that logic only apply to Trump or to congress too? Trump ran his campaigns on draining the swamp. In his first term he didn't do anything. This time around he's only switched some of the swamp people out but hasn't actually touched the swamp itself. In some ways he's actually expanding it.
The part where you're implying he's negotiating the very public and whiplashing way that he does just so people close to him can insider trade is the leftoid tier criticism because it lacks basis in anything other than orange man bad.
Tariffs are only beneficial if they're in place long enough and stable enough to build up industry, otherwise the consumer is just getting indirectly taxed for things that have no domestic alternative
For certain things, absolutely. But for most products, it isn't like there are absolutely no American options, they are just being undercut by cheap foreign shit. But I definitely agree that the lion's share of benefit from tariffs are mid to long term, and I think it is unlikely much of that benefit would be realized before someone comes along and undoes them.
You're getting down voted but its true. It's a form of market manipulation which is rampant in politics.
I can also be of the mind that accurately applied tariffs are effective at protecting domestic industries.
The problem is there is zero basis for it. It's reddit-tier filling in the blanks through the lens of orange man bad despite there being a more reasonable explanation.
There may be someone somewhere who catches wind of info ahead of time and uses it to insider trade. But absent that proof (and believe me if there was any, we'd have seen it), and proof it was intentionally allowed, I am left to assume that is just how Trump negotiates, which is an easy assumption to make because it is well in-line with how he has acted for a decade now.
The argument reminds me of the NO WAR FOR OIL! protests around the Iraq War. There were many reasons to be against that war, and hidden agendas for carrying it out, but 'we wanted to steal their oil' was the most inane astroturfed libdem take that distracted from legitimate opposition. Especially when as Trump pointed out we didn't even take the oil like we should have.
Nah its called basic reasoning. Pols all engage in corruption and trump is into shit like crypto crap and selling merch and shit. His family etc are definitely profiting from his presidency.
I don't need a SOOOOURCE to know they are making money with the political theater.