Just because he is repeatedly using threats of even higher tariffs as a negotiating tactic, doesn't mean it's for insider trading.
But it may be. Who knows? Just because leftists say it, doesn't mean it's automatically false. There's so much BS surrounding Trump, it's almost impossible to figure out what's true and what's false. Leftists may be cultists and assume everything negative about him is true, but do I also have to be a cultist and assume that it's false?
Sure, but I'm responding to someone who seems oh so certain that it must be for insider trading. If there was some insider trading going on, I wouldn't be shocked. It's certainly greater than a 0% chance, perhaps even over 25%. But given the competing explanations and weak circumstantial evidence, I see no reason to think it's more than that, but that can always change. And of course, rogue insider trading wouldn't immediately imply systemic, intentional, sanctioned insider trading. Which is what that user was clearly insinuating is happening.
But it may be. Who knows? Just because leftists say it, doesn't mean it's automatically false. There's so much BS surrounding Trump, it's almost impossible to figure out what's true and what's false. Leftists may be cultists and assume everything negative about him is true, but do I also have to be a cultist and assume that it's false?
Sure, but I'm responding to someone who seems oh so certain that it must be for insider trading. If there was some insider trading going on, I wouldn't be shocked. It's certainly greater than a 0% chance, perhaps even over 25%. But given the competing explanations and weak circumstantial evidence, I see no reason to think it's more than that, but that can always change. And of course, rogue insider trading wouldn't immediately imply systemic, intentional, sanctioned insider trading. Which is what that user was clearly insinuating is happening.
Your views are reasonable. It's unreasonable to claim that it's definitely not happening or that it's definitely happening.