Yea, she's a bit psycho. Video of a man being mad that he's having a third daughter in a gender-reveal, she says it's a red flag, and the comments are half women insulting men for sperm deciding the sex, and men calling them retarded because it's not their choice.
And another one where a dad throws away a bikini for his toddler daughter, and she acts like a dad saying that makes him a weirdo.
Thought experiment: how would people here respond if a woman got mad at a gender-reveal that she's having a third son? I guess that doesn't really work, but imagine it's right after birth.
I have no trouble that a guy who throws a fit at a gender reveal that he has a daughter, even if it's his third, is a worthless sperg. I can understand disappointment, not throwing a hissy fit.
If a woman was mad about having a son, I imagine the response here would be: "time estimate on when she tries to troon him out?"
I don't have the video on hand, but I think I remember the only context in that gender reveal video was seeing the guy walk off into the house. We didn't really get to see a hissy fit happen. Personally, if a guy already has multiple daughters and no sons, I would understand him feeling a little frustrated that he hasn't had one yet, at the very least because a son is traditionally how you pass down your family name and legacy.
If a woman was mad about having a son, I imagine the response here would be: "time estimate on when she tries to troon him out?"
Probably. So they immediately recognize that a woman being mad over having a third son is nuts, but they think it's perfectly normal for a man to be mad over having a third daughter?
Personally, if a guy already has multiple daughters and no sons, I would understand him feeling a little frustrated that he hasn't had one yet, at the very least because a son is traditionally how you pass down your family name and legacy.
I agree. But losing your bearings at a public gathering over it is the most pathetic thing you can do.
a woman being mad over having a third son is nuts, but they think it's perfectly normal for a man to be mad over having a third daughter?
When you remove the context and use hypotheticals like that, then it does make it seem like a double standard, but I don't really view this community as being "the same as Anna Slatz but pro-male". People here will definitely roast a man for having a public freakout, and the motivation of the mother or father would come into play when judging them. I don't think people would be saying that a father should divorce his wife because she got frustrated over having 3 sons, unless there was some additional context that would indicate she hates males or that she will mistreat her sons for being male.
Anna Slatz and her followers, however, do not care about context. They are rigidly team female and anti-male no matter what the situation might be.
How mad are we talking? Disappointment? Theatrical rage bait? I think being genuinely angry that your kids are all the same gender is weird no matter what, but I'm also skeptical that's what happened, and if it did that it's real.
For what it's worth, I think you're being downvoted because you're playing devil's advocate for no reason. Nobody's taking the man's side here. They were pointing out how retarded the feminist argument of "erm honey actually the man chooses the gender" is. Might as well say the woman chooses whether or not to have a stillbirth.
I think being genuinely angry that your kids are all the same gender is weird no matter what, but I'm also skeptical that's what happened, and if it did that it's real.
I'm only going by what other users have reported. By the description of the user who was mad that this woman thought that guy was a weirdo, it does seem to me that the guy was very weird.
I think you're being downvoted because you're playing devil's advocate for no reason. Nobody's taking the man's side here. They were pointing out how retarded the feminist argument of "erm honey actually the man chooses the gender" is.
I hope so - but I don't get this last part. I've never heard that, or am I misreading this?
The egg always has the X chromosome. The sperm can be X or Y. Therefore, physiologically, the gender is determined by the father. Certain feminists like pointing this out when a man gets a gender of kid he doesn't prefer.
I'm sure I don't have to explain to you what a stupid line of thought that is.
Yea, she's a bit psycho. Video of a man being mad that he's having a third daughter in a gender-reveal, she says it's a red flag, and the comments are half women insulting men for sperm deciding the sex, and men calling them retarded because it's not their choice.
And another one where a dad throws away a bikini for his toddler daughter, and she acts like a dad saying that makes him a weirdo.
Whatever company manufactures bikinis for toddlers should be investigated, dismantled, and the designers buried under the prison.
Yep, she's basically like TheImp but in reverse. Her threads are always filled with shizo-level rationalizations for blaming everything on men.
Thought experiment: how would people here respond if a woman got mad at a gender-reveal that she's having a third son? I guess that doesn't really work, but imagine it's right after birth.
I have no trouble that a guy who throws a fit at a gender reveal that he has a daughter, even if it's his third, is a worthless sperg. I can understand disappointment, not throwing a hissy fit.
If a woman was mad about having a son, I imagine the response here would be: "time estimate on when she tries to troon him out?"
I don't have the video on hand, but I think I remember the only context in that gender reveal video was seeing the guy walk off into the house. We didn't really get to see a hissy fit happen. Personally, if a guy already has multiple daughters and no sons, I would understand him feeling a little frustrated that he hasn't had one yet, at the very least because a son is traditionally how you pass down your family name and legacy.
↑this. There's a reason why, historically, in allegory, Satan always requests the first born S O N. Just sayin'.
Also why "every male that opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord".
Probably. So they immediately recognize that a woman being mad over having a third son is nuts, but they think it's perfectly normal for a man to be mad over having a third daughter?
I agree. But losing your bearings at a public gathering over it is the most pathetic thing you can do.
A father who is disappointed that he doesn't have a son almost certainly won't harbor a grudge against the daughter who he had instead.
That's the difference.
When you remove the context and use hypotheticals like that, then it does make it seem like a double standard, but I don't really view this community as being "the same as Anna Slatz but pro-male". People here will definitely roast a man for having a public freakout, and the motivation of the mother or father would come into play when judging them. I don't think people would be saying that a father should divorce his wife because she got frustrated over having 3 sons, unless there was some additional context that would indicate she hates males or that she will mistreat her sons for being male.
Anna Slatz and her followers, however, do not care about context. They are rigidly team female and anti-male no matter what the situation might be.
How mad are we talking? Disappointment? Theatrical rage bait? I think being genuinely angry that your kids are all the same gender is weird no matter what, but I'm also skeptical that's what happened, and if it did that it's real.
For what it's worth, I think you're being downvoted because you're playing devil's advocate for no reason. Nobody's taking the man's side here. They were pointing out how retarded the feminist argument of "erm honey actually the man chooses the gender" is. Might as well say the woman chooses whether or not to have a stillbirth.
I'm only going by what other users have reported. By the description of the user who was mad that this woman thought that guy was a weirdo, it does seem to me that the guy was very weird.
I hope so - but I don't get this last part. I've never heard that, or am I misreading this?
The egg always has the X chromosome. The sperm can be X or Y. Therefore, physiologically, the gender is determined by the father. Certain feminists like pointing this out when a man gets a gender of kid he doesn't prefer.
I'm sure I don't have to explain to you what a stupid line of thought that is.