If a woman was mad about having a son, I imagine the response here would be: "time estimate on when she tries to troon him out?"
Probably. So they immediately recognize that a woman being mad over having a third son is nuts, but they think it's perfectly normal for a man to be mad over having a third daughter?
Personally, if a guy already has multiple daughters and no sons, I would understand him feeling a little frustrated that he hasn't had one yet, at the very least because a son is traditionally how you pass down your family name and legacy.
I agree. But losing your bearings at a public gathering over it is the most pathetic thing you can do.
a woman being mad over having a third son is nuts, but they think it's perfectly normal for a man to be mad over having a third daughter?
When you remove the context and use hypotheticals like that, then it does make it seem like a double standard, but I don't really view this community as being "the same as Anna Slatz but pro-male". People here will definitely roast a man for having a public freakout, and the motivation of the mother or father would come into play when judging them. I don't think people would be saying that a father should divorce his wife because she got frustrated over having 3 sons, unless there was some additional context that would indicate she hates males or that she will mistreat her sons for being male.
Anna Slatz and her followers, however, do not care about context. They are rigidly team female and anti-male no matter what the situation might be.
Probably. So they immediately recognize that a woman being mad over having a third son is nuts, but they think it's perfectly normal for a man to be mad over having a third daughter?
I agree. But losing your bearings at a public gathering over it is the most pathetic thing you can do.
A father who is disappointed that he doesn't have a son almost certainly won't harbor a grudge against the daughter who he had instead.
That's the difference.
He might if he's crazy enough to throw a fit at a public gathering.
When you remove the context and use hypotheticals like that, then it does make it seem like a double standard, but I don't really view this community as being "the same as Anna Slatz but pro-male". People here will definitely roast a man for having a public freakout, and the motivation of the mother or father would come into play when judging them. I don't think people would be saying that a father should divorce his wife because she got frustrated over having 3 sons, unless there was some additional context that would indicate she hates males or that she will mistreat her sons for being male.
Anna Slatz and her followers, however, do not care about context. They are rigidly team female and anti-male no matter what the situation might be.