It takes 70-80 years before a tree reaches stable production. There are some multi-millennia old trees and orchards still producing. They are literally destroying productive things that are older than their nation.
Bullshit. 70 years BEFORE they produce?
Even fig trees are productive after 10 years, they're one of the longest to mature. Olive trees are producing in 3-5 years, and 'stable' after 10. There are many small groves and some have indeed been around for decades. Once they get too old they are cut down. Same as the past 2000 years.
Olive trees "can produce" for a long time, but their output is greatly diminished after a certain time. Just like wine-grapes! After a fixed number of years they get pulled up & new ones are planted.
Also: you go and plant something on someone else's property? Guess what, they have every right to cut it down.
It's not bullshit, especially if you actually read what I said. Olives start getting very small crops at 10 years, but only produce once every few years when they are that young. It takes 70 years of cultivation until they are consistent.
Well, no, that's not all he's doing, because that last line renders a moral judgment unrelated to olive trees. But even without that line, when you open by saying "bullshit" and then misstating the opposing position in a subtly incorrect way, you've crossed the line from "questioning" to "being combative about."
There's questioning something you don't know about, and then there's being an asshole about something while being categorically wrong AND showing that you don't even understand the words you're replying to, and 5Cats was/is doing the latter former.
So in summary, we can say that olive trees between 5 and 100 years old are the most productive and which also offer the best quality. From that age onwards, both productivity and quality decrease.
From a link that someone thought disputed my position, but in fact proves it.
If a Pally BOUGHT land? They own it, they can do as they please. If they murder the owners? They do not. This is pretty simple stuff here.
Are you claiming that the lawful owners of land CANNOT alter it in any way? They must allow non-owners to utilize it for profit and receive nothing in compensation? Really?
Another link for you. It doesn't take but a quick Google search to show how full of shit you are. If they bought the land and decided to do something different... Well that's the only argument you made earlier that can be debatable. But please, spare the bullshit
So in summary, we can say that olive trees between 5 and 100 years old are the most productive and which also offer the best quality. From that age onwards, both productivity and quality decrease.
Thank you for proving MY position. The trees in the image are CLEARLY NOT 2000 years old, ok? You're not thinking, only feeling.
Try reading it again. They produce more at 100 years old than at 60 years old and some of the trees are still producing at 2,500 years old. Your comment proves you didn't read it. Also check my other comment where the point I did agree with you is where they can do whatever they want with the land if they bought it or already own it.
It takes 70-80 years before a tree reaches stable production. There are some multi-millennia old trees and orchards still producing. They are literally destroying productive things that are older than their nation.
It is their nature.
They are the epitome of "would burn down the world in order to rule over the ashes"
Bullshit. 70 years BEFORE they produce?
Even fig trees are productive after 10 years, they're one of the longest to mature. Olive trees are producing in 3-5 years, and 'stable' after 10. There are many small groves and some have indeed been around for decades. Once they get too old they are cut down. Same as the past 2000 years.
Olive trees "can produce" for a long time, but their output is greatly diminished after a certain time. Just like wine-grapes! After a fixed number of years they get pulled up & new ones are planted.
Also: you go and plant something on someone else's property? Guess what, they have every right to cut it down.
It's not bullshit, especially if you actually read what I said. Olives start getting very small crops at 10 years, but only produce once every few years when they are that young. It takes 70 years of cultivation until they are consistent.
https://www.hunker.com/13428601/how-long-does-it-take-for-an-olive-tree-to-produce-fruit/
https://masiaelaltet.com/blog/olive-trees-which-are-thousands-of-years-old/
So the Pallies have every right to tear down Israel?
All you are trying to do is defend jews.
I'm guessing he is a fanatical evangelical.
Could just be an IDT time zone poster.
All he is doing is questioning a highly surprising fact about Olive Trees as a crop. Calm the fuck down.
Well, no, that's not all he's doing, because that last line renders a moral judgment unrelated to olive trees. But even without that line, when you open by saying "bullshit" and then misstating the opposing position in a subtly incorrect way, you've crossed the line from "questioning" to "being combative about."
There's questioning something you don't know about, and then there's being an asshole about something while being categorically wrong AND showing that you don't even understand the words you're replying to, and 5Cats was/is doing the
latterformer.Edit: Wrong word.
Oh, so NOW you can give someone an extremely charitable interpretation of their (obviously goalpost-shifting) argument.
God you're an asshole.
You could literally google that in 2 seconds
From a link that someone thought disputed my position, but in fact proves it.
If a Pally BOUGHT land? They own it, they can do as they please. If they murder the owners? They do not. This is pretty simple stuff here.
Are you claiming that the lawful owners of land CANNOT alter it in any way? They must allow non-owners to utilize it for profit and receive nothing in compensation? Really?
10 years? You're thinking of figs I think.
Are you an alt of Cats5, the israeli former CNN employee who mods GreatAwakening, or is that just a really unfortunate name choice?
CNN employee? Them's fighting words! 😉
So no.
Are you an alt of Graphius, the neo-Nazi wanted on international warrants? 🙄 Or just a fan of his?
Ahh, a zionist faggot, of course you are.
Their actions are retarded. You cannot refute that. So you end up here. Where it's their "right" to act harmfully.
You are the worst kind of person.
If I go and build something on land you own, and make money off this without giving you anything, that's A-OK in your mind? Really?
https://masiaelaltet.com/blog/olive-trees-which-are-thousands-of-years-old/
Another link for you. It doesn't take but a quick Google search to show how full of shit you are. If they bought the land and decided to do something different... Well that's the only argument you made earlier that can be debatable. But please, spare the bullshit
Thank you for proving MY position. The trees in the image are CLEARLY NOT 2000 years old, ok? You're not thinking, only feeling.
Try reading it again. They produce more at 100 years old than at 60 years old and some of the trees are still producing at 2,500 years old. Your comment proves you didn't read it. Also check my other comment where the point I did agree with you is where they can do whatever they want with the land if they bought it or already own it.