users anonymously share info and warnings about men to spot red flags
What if people simply lie to ruin an innocent person's life? Like, a common scenario would be, say, if a girl breaks up with a guy, and then he ends up finding a new girlfriend sooner than she finds a new boyfriend, then that's enough motivation in her womanbrain to slander her ex as an abusive rapist.
Sometimes you get a bad one, but at least 50% are easily passable to any normal person who isn't specifically looking for the more hard to spot tells. Since half are men, it would take about 5 minutes of F5ing to find the right image, and another 5 to edit your own ID. Then drop the resolution for more jpeg.
Yeah, if you're gonna use Midjourney or DALL-E, then the results will suck. But if you install StableDiffusion and make it yourself locally (or find someone else who can) then the results tend to be far better.
Why would you presuppose that the “ID reviewer” working for a feminist gossip app is operating in good faith? Never mind rejecting AI generated bullshit, the person in this position is very likely to be using AI to generate her own profiles to also slander innocent men.
A woman is also anyone who identifies as a woman, but since you are only pretending to be a man identifying as woman at this moment instead of identifying as one for real, it doesn't count, so BANNED!
It starts out with half of them being men, they take over, and then eventually publicly declare men to be women in attempt to silence anyone complaining about it being mostly men.
And how is this enforced?
What if people simply lie to ruin an innocent person's life? Like, a common scenario would be, say, if a girl breaks up with a guy, and then he ends up finding a new girlfriend sooner than she finds a new boyfriend, then that's enough motivation in her womanbrain to slander her ex as an abusive rapist.
Vic Mignogna writ large.
According to people on X, you have to submit a photo and, apparently, those are manually reviewed or something.
Seems odd for an anonymous app, but whatever.
It would be trivial to train an AI to generate fake ID photos.
Sure, but if a person is looking at them it might not pass. AI has that uncanny valley thing going for it still.
This has been online for like 5 years now: https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/
Sometimes you get a bad one, but at least 50% are easily passable to any normal person who isn't specifically looking for the more hard to spot tells. Since half are men, it would take about 5 minutes of F5ing to find the right image, and another 5 to edit your own ID. Then drop the resolution for more jpeg.
Just do some down sampling in MS Paint.
Yeah, if you're gonna use Midjourney or DALL-E, then the results will suck. But if you install StableDiffusion and make it yourself locally (or find someone else who can) then the results tend to be far better.
Why would you presuppose that the “ID reviewer” working for a feminist gossip app is operating in good faith? Never mind rejecting AI generated bullshit, the person in this position is very likely to be using AI to generate her own profiles to also slander innocent men.
Good point!
But leftists will just "doublethink" their way out of it.
Trans women are real women! But YOU are just pretending to be trans, so banned.
A woman is also anyone who identifies as a woman, but since you are only pretending to be a man identifying as woman at this moment instead of identifying as one for real, it doesn't count, so BANNED!
"And how is this enforced?"
Probably the same way as on /r/twoxchromosomes
It starts out with half of them being men, they take over, and then eventually publicly declare men to be women in attempt to silence anyone complaining about it being mostly men.
You say that as if it isn't the point.
Not sure, if you've already seen it, but you had to upload your government ID.
And the data already got leaked and every user doxxed, because data security was non-existent. We're talking unprotected cloud drive here.