Sometimes you get a bad one, but at least 50% are easily passable to any normal person who isn't specifically looking for the more hard to spot tells. Since half are men, it would take about 5 minutes of F5ing to find the right image, and another 5 to edit your own ID. Then drop the resolution for more jpeg.
Yeah, if you're gonna use Midjourney or DALL-E, then the results will suck. But if you install StableDiffusion and make it yourself locally (or find someone else who can) then the results tend to be far better.
Why would you presuppose that the “ID reviewer” working for a feminist gossip app is operating in good faith? Never mind rejecting AI generated bullshit, the person in this position is very likely to be using AI to generate her own profiles to also slander innocent men.
Sure, but if a person is looking at them it might not pass. AI has that uncanny valley thing going for it still.
This has been online for like 5 years now: https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/
Sometimes you get a bad one, but at least 50% are easily passable to any normal person who isn't specifically looking for the more hard to spot tells. Since half are men, it would take about 5 minutes of F5ing to find the right image, and another 5 to edit your own ID. Then drop the resolution for more jpeg.
Refresh until you get a pic that has more than one person in it if you want to see this going nuts.
Just do some down sampling in MS Paint.
Yeah, if you're gonna use Midjourney or DALL-E, then the results will suck. But if you install StableDiffusion and make it yourself locally (or find someone else who can) then the results tend to be far better.
Why would you presuppose that the “ID reviewer” working for a feminist gossip app is operating in good faith? Never mind rejecting AI generated bullshit, the person in this position is very likely to be using AI to generate her own profiles to also slander innocent men.