Would anti-loli laws ban the Quran given Aisha's age?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
First, PLEASE say this is AI
Second, no because the people that make 'anti-loli laws' are pussies and scared Muslims will just kill them as they can't enforce a law if the lawmakers are dead.
CGI actually, you couldn't tell?
And that's on me for forgetting the eternal caveat of "browns and blacks won't be prosecuted for crime"
Thought it might've been some painting depicting it for religious reasons as in THEY made it to CELEBRATE the fact it happened.
THEY would never draw Muhammed. (((They)) would though.
Musabbir tries to recreate arab history in India and gets shot in leg by uttar pradesh police.
islamic values against minor Hindu girls: https://x.com/SachinGuptaUP/status/1937109000471842849
Uttar Pradesh police response to his right leg: https://x.com/bareillypolice/status/1937098229184692607/video/2
https://archive.ph/0cnT2
https://www.opindia.com/2025/06/uttar-pradesh-musabbir-molests-minor-girl-in-broad-daylight-in-bareilly-shot-in-the-leg-by-police-while-trying-to-flee-arrested/
more info: https://communities.win/c/Funny/p/19Ax7POpa3/x/c
Where did you find an AI brave enough to draw muhammad?
It is AI, but it is reality too.
No, I'd ban the Quaran because it is a totalitarian political ideology with religious trappings that has brought untold misery and death around the world for 1400 years.
Impressive, very nice. Now do the Talmud.
The Talmud is a book of opinions. Really crappy opinions, but still opinions. Not the infallible Word of God.
The Koran is (allegedly) the writings of their religion's perfect man, who received it straight from (a demon posing as) the angel Gabriel, and they declare it SO sacred that it can only be understood in Arabic--any translation desacralizes it.
They are not the same.
They're both heathen garbage that have caused centuries of damage to indigenous Europeans. They are the same and should be thrown into the same fire.
yea.. ban a book.. that'll stop it!
it is kinda hilarious.. would credit card companies stop working with muslim countries or muslims?? lol
Paypal's okay with arabs selling black libyan slaves though.
We do not need another pedo pajeet posting smut in this forum.
woosh
The answer to this is pretty obvious, if a technicality, but OP is evidently posting rage-bait.
Would the specific laws apply? No.
Why? Because they're designed around images. <- This is the technicality for those not following.
Are there images of the subject in the book in question? No.
Why? Because such images are considered blasphemy in general, regardless of whether any of the wives are included or not. It's one of the big reasons Charlie Hebdo happened.
in a just world, yes
Why's the dude wearing a turban?
Even if it did it's still not worth it.