I seriously believe it’s 2/3s female nature/ feminism and 1/3 being shoved on a hormone disrupter the second they reach puberty. Birth control has already been shown to caused permanent changes to the brain and neurochemicals when taken since puberty, the only thing we don’t know is whether it’s a moderate effect or far worse, considering the amount of young women who are egregiously mentally ill im betting on the latter.
This. People seriously underestimate what birth control does to women. It makes them long for men with softer faces, less testosterone and makes them less tribal while making them much more neurotic. Throw in all the other drugs white women are on plus the sheer amount of death cult propaganda and a good chunk of their behavior becomes explainable. Even a decade ago a research paper I read pointed out that about third of all American white women had some sort of mental disorder, with only black women being slightly higher percentage (30% vs 33%). Only black men came close, at about 25%. Everybody else was in the tens. God only knows how bad it is now, as that paper is now well over a decade old.
Maybe I'm just a retarded guy, but recalling that one hour-long video that talked about what birth control actually does to a woman's body, if you tried to shove similar into mine, my response would likely involve firearms.
I can't fathom why women think this is a good thing. A dark part of my brain has slowly grown over time with the approach of 'Women should be treated as children with all the authority and responsibility thereof', and I really wish reality would stop adding arguments in favor of that approach.
Fun aside, I recall one study that seemed to imply that birth control can actually make women gay. Wish I had that on-hand, but my organizational skills for such things are abysmal...
A dark part of my brain has slowly grown over time with the approach of 'Women should be treated as children with all the authority and responsibility thereof'
Hoe_math had a great video where he broke down the phenomenon of “all women are 10s”. Essentially, his assertion was that women engage in collective bargaining with reality itself. They will adopt a position that they know to be empirically false as long as it benefits them as a group, and they will ruthlessly enforce that position on everyone else via social games.
My biggest takeaway from this video: should we really allow such people to vote? To control our institutions or communities? They collectively lie, without hesitation, about this thing that is so painfully and obviously untrue, because it benefits them. There is no loyalty to the truth whatsoever. That’s all “emotion-based reasoning” is, in the end: lying.
They collectively lie, without hesitation, about this thing that is so painfully and obviously untrue, because it benefits them
They’re not lying. They’re not consciously lying. It’s more like, they’re hypnotized. They really believe what they’re saying.
If someone is lying and you keep hammering on the fact that you know they’re lying, eventually the facade cracks and they admit they lied. But women actually believe their bullshit.
This is one of the reasons democracy is shit. However, a blanket ban on female voting misses three things. In order of importance, it doesn't address retarded men, it would be a hard sell through all the current propaganda, and it would ignore the exceptions to the rule.
This is why a starship troopers style earned vote is better.
Women should be treated as children with all the authority and responsibility thereof
So you have rediscovered why women were 'kept in the kitchen', why female nature has been so tightly constrained. Our ancestors didn't do it because they hated women, just understood their nature.
Don't apply understanding to what is adequately explained by meme selection (in the original sense of cultural traits that can die off via natural selection).
Our ancestors didn't necessarily understand why certain cultural traits existed, but groups that didn't have them died off.
Note how all the multiple gender cultures cited only existed in isolated islands and jungles, and were generally replaced once their isolation ended. Same for family structures other than father-mother and avuncular families.
Fun aside, I recall one study that seemed to imply that birth control can actually make women gay. Wish I had that on-hand, but my organizational skills for such things are abysmal...
Yes, it was discussed by Dr Sarah Hill in a podcast relatively recently and she brings up the results of those studies you're referencing:
https://youtu.be/MGposaKNJKQ?t=3334
TL;DW: Birth control can suppress a woman's natural desire to be inseminated by a male, and thus may influence her to seek out more feminine men or other women.
And yeah, I knew that birth control would fuck around with a woman's hormonal cycle to the point that they'd go for the, well, with lack of a better term 'Beta Male' - this is why, iirc, people were commenting on how attraction would radically change for women when they went off of it(IE, trying to get pregnant in marriage). But I would think there's a vast gap between 'Birth control makes women go for weaker/feminine men' and 'Birth Control makes women gay'.
That’s entirely false, you’re conflating androstenone with androstenol and androstadienone. The latter are produced the same but are affected by testosterone levels which creates a reaction from reaction from women and alter their mood positively.
Are you suggesting that prior to about one-hundred years ago, women were pheromonally repelled by men roughly ninety percent of the time? That sounds kind of improbable. I doubt such a species would survive, and if it did, it almost certainly wouldn't survive in the pair-bonding, shared living space way that humans seem to favor. Where did you hear this?
I seriously believe it’s 2/3s female nature/ feminism and 1/3 being shoved on a hormone disrupter the second they reach puberty. Birth control has already been shown to caused permanent changes to the brain and neurochemicals when taken since puberty, the only thing we don’t know is whether it’s a moderate effect or far worse, considering the amount of young women who are egregiously mentally ill im betting on the latter.
This. People seriously underestimate what birth control does to women. It makes them long for men with softer faces, less testosterone and makes them less tribal while making them much more neurotic. Throw in all the other drugs white women are on plus the sheer amount of death cult propaganda and a good chunk of their behavior becomes explainable. Even a decade ago a research paper I read pointed out that about third of all American white women had some sort of mental disorder, with only black women being slightly higher percentage (30% vs 33%). Only black men came close, at about 25%. Everybody else was in the tens. God only knows how bad it is now, as that paper is now well over a decade old.
Maybe I'm just a retarded guy, but recalling that one hour-long video that talked about what birth control actually does to a woman's body, if you tried to shove similar into mine, my response would likely involve firearms.
I can't fathom why women think this is a good thing. A dark part of my brain has slowly grown over time with the approach of 'Women should be treated as children with all the authority and responsibility thereof', and I really wish reality would stop adding arguments in favor of that approach.
Fun aside, I recall one study that seemed to imply that birth control can actually make women gay. Wish I had that on-hand, but my organizational skills for such things are abysmal...
Hoe_math had a great video where he broke down the phenomenon of “all women are 10s”. Essentially, his assertion was that women engage in collective bargaining with reality itself. They will adopt a position that they know to be empirically false as long as it benefits them as a group, and they will ruthlessly enforce that position on everyone else via social games.
My biggest takeaway from this video: should we really allow such people to vote? To control our institutions or communities? They collectively lie, without hesitation, about this thing that is so painfully and obviously untrue, because it benefits them. There is no loyalty to the truth whatsoever. That’s all “emotion-based reasoning” is, in the end: lying.
It’s actually worse than:
They’re not lying. They’re not consciously lying. It’s more like, they’re hypnotized. They really believe what they’re saying.
If someone is lying and you keep hammering on the fact that you know they’re lying, eventually the facade cracks and they admit they lied. But women actually believe their bullshit.
It’s called the matriarchal longhouse. It destroyed the Iroquois Indians and will do so to any nation that allows it.
This is one of the reasons democracy is shit. However, a blanket ban on female voting misses three things. In order of importance, it doesn't address retarded men, it would be a hard sell through all the current propaganda, and it would ignore the exceptions to the rule.
This is why a starship troopers style earned vote is better.
So you have rediscovered why women were 'kept in the kitchen', why female nature has been so tightly constrained. Our ancestors didn't do it because they hated women, just understood their nature.
Don't apply understanding to what is adequately explained by meme selection (in the original sense of cultural traits that can die off via natural selection).
Our ancestors didn't necessarily understand why certain cultural traits existed, but groups that didn't have them died off.
Note how all the multiple gender cultures cited only existed in isolated islands and jungles, and were generally replaced once their isolation ended. Same for family structures other than father-mother and avuncular families.
Menstrual cramps. That's it. They just don't want cramps once a month.
The ability to camouflage estrus and manipulate beta/alpha men is deeply rooted in female psychology. They'll pay any price to get it.
Yes, it was discussed by Dr Sarah Hill in a podcast relatively recently and she brings up the results of those studies you're referencing: https://youtu.be/MGposaKNJKQ?t=3334
TL;DW: Birth control can suppress a woman's natural desire to be inseminated by a male, and thus may influence her to seek out more feminine men or other women.
Yoink. Thanks for this.
And yeah, I knew that birth control would fuck around with a woman's hormonal cycle to the point that they'd go for the, well, with lack of a better term 'Beta Male' - this is why, iirc, people were commenting on how attraction would radically change for women when they went off of it(IE, trying to get pregnant in marriage). But I would think there's a vast gap between 'Birth control makes women go for weaker/feminine men' and 'Birth Control makes women gay'.
I guess not.
It also alters their pons and removes their ability to sense pheromones which throws off their ability to pair bond almost entirely.
Women don't bond to male pheromones. They are a repellent that women become non-sensitized to when ovulating. That is why modern men bathe.
The 'pheromones' for sale to attract women are actually female pheromones that mostly just reduce aggression response.
That’s entirely false, you’re conflating androstenone with androstenol and androstadienone. The latter are produced the same but are affected by testosterone levels which creates a reaction from reaction from women and alter their mood positively.
Are you suggesting that prior to about one-hundred years ago, women were pheromonally repelled by men roughly ninety percent of the time? That sounds kind of improbable. I doubt such a species would survive, and if it did, it almost certainly wouldn't survive in the pair-bonding, shared living space way that humans seem to favor. Where did you hear this?