The student shrieking "transphobia!" at sodomy icon's own quotes in support of fucking children is quite telling. Classic example of the left turning on their own for stepping away from the orthodoxy for a moment.
Queers were always about "getting off" and being deviants, they needed the forbidden to do it. Children are an easy target throughout history. Rape is fine, but adults often fight back, and the men of a community will likely hunt you down too.
Edit: He's about to say this at the very end. The entire thing is about transgressing (societal norms? Something like that).
I wonder what will happen when "anything goes" (pure Anarchism) and they can screw what they want. What will be forbidden then 🤔 so they can get their jollies?
I forget his name but this was from several years ago and he is actually an academician who was studying something like the history of sex and gender. He wasn't right wing, he was just pointing out that there's no way to ignore the pedophilia tolerant stances of people within Queer Theory, especially since the biggest names in Queer Theory never tried to reject their tolerance for it.
You'll notice he said, "I've been talking about rape culture all day. You think pedophilia isn't rape culture?". He's arguing from a Feminist position against queer theory. Thing is, he's 100% right. Pedophilia is, by definition, rape; and tolerance for it is well within what the Left considers "rape culture".
Queer theory by its own structure is the allowance of all sexual behavior to dilute “heteronormativity”. To these degenerate psychos pedophilia is actually an oppressed class. This is also why they are trying to manipulate women with “MAPs” because if they can get moms to agree to it (look at the pride parades, “child friendly” drag queen shows, etc) it makes it impossible for pedophilia to not become mainstream, as they have already hamstrung men to being irrelevant in most households.
That's why he also linked it to Anarchism, because Queer Theory as he's using it is just a kind of Sexual Anarchism. I think it's less anarchistic, and more just: Sex Communism. It's not merely the eradication of boundary and order, it's treating heterosexuality and sexual reproduction as bourgeois.
What you're describing is also rhetorical warfare. MAP is supposed to have less 'stigma' than pedophilia. That's why the quote he reads from the book uses 'boy-lover'. They are trying to de-stigmatize something that should be stigmatized.
It's not merely the eradication of boundary and order, it's treating heterosexuality and sexual reproduction as bourgeois.
This is entirely correct, anything that utilizes intersectionality and “power dynamics” is, by its nature, a communist/marxist ideology. It’s the limbs of postmodernism along with CRT, deconstructionism and feminism.
What you're describing is also rhetorical warfare. MAP is supposed to have less 'stigma' than pedophilia. That's why the quote he reads from the book uses 'boy-lover'. They are trying to de-stigmatize something that should be stigmatized.
This a subset of the “positivity movement” that started in the 60s as well, academics conditioned people (mainly women) to believe any negative thoughts were inherently bad (unless approved by authority figures). This is why there’s been a growing push against revulsion, fear, and anger (all natural responses inherent in the brain) and replacing them with “acceptance” because revulsion feelings towards hedonism keeps stigmatizing those behaviors.
This is why there’s been a growing push against revulsion, fear, and anger
Don't forget "Shame". The stigmatization of shame was, I would argue, their greatest victory.
Shame can be weaponized and pathologized (like anything else), but is an emotion that is anti-narcissistic, and explicitly requires introspection and consideration of others around you. Shame is good. This is why being "shameless" is bad, and calling someone "shameless" doesn't have the negative connotation it used to.
He's a lefty anarcho-primitivist and co-founder of Deep Green Resistance (which you may have heard of because Graham Linehan is in it). They are kind of like a lefty version of Uncle Ted in their beliefs. I haven't heard of them doing anything violent though.
He was basically trying to gatekeep pedos out of anarchism with this talk.
The student shrieking "transphobia!" at sodomy icon's own quotes in support of fucking children is quite telling. Classic example of the left turning on their own for stepping away from the orthodoxy for a moment.
Queers were always about "getting off" and being deviants, they needed the forbidden to do it. Children are an easy target throughout history. Rape is fine, but adults often fight back, and the men of a community will likely hunt you down too.
Edit: He's about to say this at the very end. The entire thing is about transgressing (societal norms? Something like that).
I wonder what will happen when "anything goes" (pure Anarchism) and they can screw what they want. What will be forbidden then 🤔 so they can get their jollies?
Gays always adopt boys... Notice that?
Oh yes, and it has played out hundreds of times, the abuse.
"Queer theory" doesn't really mean anything, it's just rejection of anything and everything that keeps the fabric of society together.
Who is this?
I forget his name but this was from several years ago and he is actually an academician who was studying something like the history of sex and gender. He wasn't right wing, he was just pointing out that there's no way to ignore the pedophilia tolerant stances of people within Queer Theory, especially since the biggest names in Queer Theory never tried to reject their tolerance for it.
You'll notice he said, "I've been talking about rape culture all day. You think pedophilia isn't rape culture?". He's arguing from a Feminist position against queer theory. Thing is, he's 100% right. Pedophilia is, by definition, rape; and tolerance for it is well within what the Left considers "rape culture".
Queer theory by its own structure is the allowance of all sexual behavior to dilute “heteronormativity”. To these degenerate psychos pedophilia is actually an oppressed class. This is also why they are trying to manipulate women with “MAPs” because if they can get moms to agree to it (look at the pride parades, “child friendly” drag queen shows, etc) it makes it impossible for pedophilia to not become mainstream, as they have already hamstrung men to being irrelevant in most households.
That's why he also linked it to Anarchism, because Queer Theory as he's using it is just a kind of Sexual Anarchism. I think it's less anarchistic, and more just: Sex Communism. It's not merely the eradication of boundary and order, it's treating heterosexuality and sexual reproduction as bourgeois.
What you're describing is also rhetorical warfare. MAP is supposed to have less 'stigma' than pedophilia. That's why the quote he reads from the book uses 'boy-lover'. They are trying to de-stigmatize something that should be stigmatized.
This is entirely correct, anything that utilizes intersectionality and “power dynamics” is, by its nature, a communist/marxist ideology. It’s the limbs of postmodernism along with CRT, deconstructionism and feminism.
This a subset of the “positivity movement” that started in the 60s as well, academics conditioned people (mainly women) to believe any negative thoughts were inherently bad (unless approved by authority figures). This is why there’s been a growing push against revulsion, fear, and anger (all natural responses inherent in the brain) and replacing them with “acceptance” because revulsion feelings towards hedonism keeps stigmatizing those behaviors.
Don't forget "Shame". The stigmatization of shame was, I would argue, their greatest victory.
Shame can be weaponized and pathologized (like anything else), but is an emotion that is anti-narcissistic, and explicitly requires introspection and consideration of others around you. Shame is good. This is why being "shameless" is bad, and calling someone "shameless" doesn't have the negative connotation it used to.
Derrick Jensen
He's a lefty anarcho-primitivist and co-founder of Deep Green Resistance (which you may have heard of because Graham Linehan is in it). They are kind of like a lefty version of Uncle Ted in their beliefs. I haven't heard of them doing anything violent though.
He was basically trying to gatekeep pedos out of anarchism with this talk.
There is your explanation.
2% account for 30% of them