Original: https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1924664688971022731
Archive: https://archive.is/6DWXF
Money quote:
Please, I need your help. We need to bring awareness and try to figure out how we can fix this message.”
No, you dumb bint, you need to carry a gun and shoot the miscreants when they misbehave.
You need to stop voting for politicians that enable that crap, too, but I know you never will.
Crime reporting is down 30%. After all, what good does it do for a victim to report crime to the police in a liberal shithole? The mayor orders the police to stand down in the name of 'racial justice', the DA drops cases in the name of 'racial justice', the judges give lenient sentences in the name of 'racial justice', black jurors refuse to give a guilty verdict in the name of 'racial justice'... and if word gets out you spoke to the cops you're just putting a bigger target on your back.
Don't forget that the cops report it as lower charges. That's why you need to follow murder rates. They're much harder to fake. You can fake them but it takes much more specific circumstances.
How long until they take a page from the Japanese and call everything a "suicide"? Then LA will have a pristine crime rate like Japan, too.
Epstein did nothing wrong, George Floyd dindu nuffin wrong
Diversity of victims. Equity redistribution through implied force. Inclusion of herself and many people she knows.
Mission Accomplished!
Honestly, I think most crime could be stopped if you let 50 plain-clothes cops walk the streets of the ghettos, calling in crimes, wandering around carrying PS5's, and leaving bait cars/bikes everywhere.
Then just have a Battalion of other cops responding to every crime they encounter.
Do that for a month, and crime will be solved.
You're not gonna jump somebody or steal their shit if there's a 50% chance they'll shoot you.
Assault Reconnaissance patrols by cops.
Most crime could be stopped if it was legal to stop crime.
Breaking news, really.
Cops refuse to help someone getting stabbed in the neighboring subway car, and you think they're going to be live bait for dindus?
No, I'm just saying what would work.
You would also need to actually jail those people. Letting them get out immediately and give them good boy ACDs for the 5th time does nothing.
You would need to find 50 very trustable and reliable black men per ghetto to do this task, as anything else would stick out too much and be obvious. I don't think I need to explain to you how unlikely we are to reach that number of available men to pick from, let alone all willing to go along with it.
It also recalls pattern recognition skills, impulse control, and delayed gratification abilities for them to actually learn anything, something they consistently show themselves unable to accomplish.
Nah, go ahead and send Officer Whitey McCracker-Honky to the ghetto. Race is just a Fabian Communist Jacobin social construct, after all.
We're all one race—the American Race™.
50 is a wildly small number compared to tens of millions.
There are multiple ghettos per middle size town, probably hundreds to thousands per state (sans the few lily white states in the center/center-north of the US). The major towns have ghettos so big that their "not even worth naming by the FBI" gangs would easily overwhelm any of these guys if they were seen walking nearby.
So you need tens of thousands of these guys, men of an extremely high caliber from a demographic known for not producing such all willing to go into what could be suicide missions. Not to mention however many cops a battalion would encompass on constant standby nearby, besides them.
Numbers aside, all of this just sounds like pretense for what would quickly just become an ethnic cleansing from shooting or killing almost every black dude possible. Which absolutely would stop most crime, but I don't think you specifically agree with.
In fact, I'd rather we skip that pretense rather than this hullabaloo costing probably trillions of tax dollars to pretend we might have a different result.
Bet.
Nah. It's not an ethnic cleansing. Criminals aren't an ethnic group and should be cleansed from society. Oppressing criminals is a moral imperative to a just society.
If a cop can't walk down the street without getting robbed, attacked or shot at, then you keep putting cops on the street until it stops.
And frankly, criminals are a vanishingly small portion of any society. Even with the "despite" statistic. The truth is not that 12% causes 51%, it's that 1% causes 51%. The remaining 99% will be better off the way that El Salvadorians are better off with a purge of the criminals too.
Ghettos by definition are mostly mono-racial. In America the word is usually only used for one race in particular. By all definitions it will end up just being an ethnic cleansing by the methodology you've chosen to use.
No disagreement. This is a discussion on how and the obvious reality it will bring that is opposed to your own standards.
Welcome to what most of us in the South lived with our entire lives. The fact that they are in fact this stupid at times and will constantly provoke a justified armed response. Its such a well known problem we have had black media talking about it for decades. One classic one for you is Chappelle's "When Keepin It Real Goes Wrong." Or Boondock's "Nigga Moment."
The only thing that often keeps them from acting is cowardice, meaning multiple openly packing officers moving through. A single plain clothes guy is just going to get jumped from behind before he can call in or respond, and then everyone scatters once they find his badge. And you'll never find those guys because snitching gets you lynched.
If you want to put a few cops on every block to overwhelm the problem that's one thing, but that's not what your original proposition was.
And the reason we don't is because when we even tried a fraction of doing so, the optics from the media kept getting so bad it was safer to just try to cordon it off and keep it in the box. Not to mention the safety of the officers themselves. Every few years going back decades now we have had a major news cycle all about a cop doing their job and a black guy getting killed out of his own idiocy, and it was enough to move mountains.
It would take a lot more than 50, I think. You do mention a Battalion of other cops as back-up, which is true! But it wouldn't take long for the "50" to get "fingered" and either evaded or killed.
It would also require actual prison sentences, so building even more prisons to house them all. Reformed DAs, Judges, lawyers...
Letting people fight back would also be a good idea! Now it's "don't touch him or you're the one getting arrested!" But if it's "he was shoplifting so I hit him a few times with this bat." Crime rates would plunge.
Fear is a force multiplier.
Prisons might be more required, but corporal punishment is better.
The fires might have attracted some moths, from near and far.
You already have the homeless there. Now you have newly dispossessed people and others from outside who see (looting, exploitative) opportunities knocking. And summer is approaching.
This would be a very bad time to be living in LA without good security.
Nothing short of concrete walls and concertina wire will be enough security in the lawless shithole that is LA.
Fortunately, we have some South African refugees that can give some tips on fortification against the darkies.
Nobody voted for this.
See, this is why people should have guns. The burglars will become friendly neighborhood gun and organ delivery staff that work for free. You can make an excellent fertilizer by fermenting bile and mixing the slurry with ground-up bone. Be sure to fry it at 400 degrees to ensure all spike protein destruction, though!