The "conservatives" who are scared of the "radical right" are the leftists and liberals of yesterday that were thrown out of today's left because they went too far left for their taste, so they try to hijack the right instead . And they are scared of TRUE right wingers that are pushing the overton window to the right and who actually want to win and will use aggressive tactics to win, because in their hearts they were never right wing to begin with and they don't actually want the true right wing to win .. .They want the right wing to forever be on the defensive and never be on the offensive.
In this specific case, this one and her gaggle of fellow single moms of mixed race kids in the replies are just engaging in some very naked self-interest to avoid the consequences of their poor decision making capabilities.
Conservatives are just people with a lot of inertia who don't like change. Like a big stupid rock that just sits there. They have a function, but are mostly useless.
A conservative who accepted the idea of trans kids will be opposed to the idea of banning the mutilation of children
With no force driving them, conservatives are never actually able to conserve anything. Even a big and heavy rock will be moved eventually by dedicated activists, who were usually left-wing in the past.
This means that if we want to bring back our traditions, for example, we need more rabid activists for tradition. This is difficult to achieve. Like I'm too old and busy to be much of an activist. The best target market for selling activism is colleges, but those are mostly taken over by woke ideologues.
I don't believe that the guy she is responding to is real. Even most "radicals" don't say things that on the nose and direct. They all have their memes and slogans and specific beliefs, not generic "revenge."
This instead reads like what a pathetic woman thinks a radical talks like. With all the autistic cadence and specific scary words.
Also, white women were never conservative or right wing. The ones that were, were doing it for "pick me" points by trying to be not like other girls on a political scale. This very comment alone is why they cannot be.
Because the moment you go towards anything above the bare minimum, they reveal that they have no balls or principles and only care about social consensus and being "kind."
Always amazes me when people act like the Internet is real and give any weight or thought to random anonymous comments. It happens on all sides, even by users here who should know better. Those of us who grew up on the uncensored internet before social media knew it was fake (but slightly less gay at the time) and it's exhausting to keep seeing not only boomers but younger people repeatedly clutch their pearls at trolls as if they were having a conversation with a real human at the supermarket. The groyper army is a great example. They don't just amplify Fuentes but also post crazy violent cartoons to troll idiots like Jordan Petersen and give his silly NGO examples of why online anonymity is bad. The other obvious example is Gamergate, aka the "right-wing misogynistic hate campaign" because anonymous users - probably the fucking journos themselves - posted insane shit for screenshots. People need to understand anons are just random chaos agents. They represent nothing and provide no insight into reality and politics. That applies to you and me too. We're basically ephemeral gamertags. What we say is noise. Maybe we'll occasionally spark an idea in a more important person higher up the chain and someone does something, but in the end only real people with real identities having conversations matters and this will all be graffiti on the walls of Pompeii.
because anonymous users - probably the fucking journos themselves - posted insane shit for screenshots
Reminder to everyone that good ol' Anita Sarkeesian, probably the reason why journos were set and ready to start GG when ZQ's shit dropped, was almost certainly confirmed to have sent the famous "death threats" that started her career to herself.
Or that one journo early on that admitted to saving and uploading CP to try and get 8chan(?) shut down.
We're basically ephemeral gamertags. What we say is noise.
Almost everyone online could log off right now, and by next month not even be noticed that they left. The rare few might reach Imp level where people remember them for the memes. But otherwise its all nonsense that shouldn't be taken seriously.
But instead people invented shit like upvotes and people take text on a screen super fucking seriously.
People need to understand anons are just random chaos agents. They represent nothing and provide no insight into reality and politics. That applies to you and me too. We're basically ephemeral gamertags. What we say is noise. Maybe we'll occasionally spark an idea in a more important person higher up the chain and someone does something, but in the end only real people with real identities having conversations matters and this will all be graffiti on the walls of Pompeii.
There is a lot of truth to this, but, you know, Gamergate. Trump. 4chan meme incubator. No one anonymous poster is important, but the scene is consequential.
That's true. We are "the keyboard warriors" after all. I'm just arguing you can't say a trend reflects reality until it translates to real actions by people who aren't anonymous and who could face consequences for saying something.
Not only do we need to collectivize as a race in order to protect our women and children, we have to make sure women are silent and compliant while it happens.
Agreed…because if we aren’t careful, kosher social engineers and propagandists will manipulate the emotions of childless women so they begin to see various recreational victim groups as their children who they must advocate for.
If we survive people are going to look back on this era far worse than the Canaanite and Carthaginian child sacrifices. At least those people had the excuse of being illiterate bronze age proto-hominids who actually believed they were gaining favor with their idols. Modern women perform child sacrifice so they can be even more repulsive druggie whores with less to worry about.
If you’re truly a conservative woman, you already know to shut up while the men speak. Female emotions poison actual conservatism, and have no place in the movement other than to support their husband’s views.
No need to be so autistic about this. Even James's definition of "woke right" does not mean "a woke right winger". We're not saying "woke right" is a thing, we're just saying if it was a thing than these idiots fit in that box far better than we do.
Typical Leftist argument: No principles matter, no morals matter, no bad tactics, only bad targets, and those targets are always shifting.
Don't be fucking stupid. An affirmative vision of a parallel society is NOT built by doing whatever you want to 'own the libs', even if it explicitly helps the Left. an affirmative vision of a parallel society that we can grow civilization into must be created by having a working philosophy and moral frame-work. Not power for power's sakes
And you support israel and what they are doing but you hate it if White people did what israel does. You claim you don't care but you fly in to a rage anytime someone talks about supporting Palestine and bringing up israel's war crimes
White nationalists speak against the muslims grooming gangs all the time. We also speak against the people who brought muslims over to the West mainly jewish organizations like ADL.
We can support Palestine and also speak against the muslim grooming gangs in Europe. But you keep pretending like supporting Palestine means we support muslims in Europe. Which we explicetly say we don't . But you have no arguement against us so you need to make a strawman and lie about us.
Sure, real WN's speak out. Qatris and glow-niggers don't.
Supporting Palestine is supporting the grooming gangs. They have the same opinion of our daughters. They don't rabe arab children as much, or you guys are otherwise okay with it.
so i was wondering why you and other JIDFs keep going on about Qatari so much and i found out why. . Its because they own al jazeera and actually have a voice in the English speaking world isn't it? You are upset that jews and zionists dont have full dominance over the media in the English speaking world that is covering news about what's going on in the middle east
Also supporting Palestine means not supporting Talmudists who create Epstein island and hold all our countries in debt.
The "conservatives" who are scared of the "radical right" are the leftists and liberals of yesterday that were thrown out of today's left because they went too far left for their taste, so they try to hijack the right instead . And they are scared of TRUE right wingers that are pushing the overton window to the right and who actually want to win and will use aggressive tactics to win, because in their hearts they were never right wing to begin with and they don't actually want the true right wing to win .. .They want the right wing to forever be on the defensive and never be on the offensive.
In this specific case, this one and her gaggle of fellow single moms of mixed race kids in the replies are just engaging in some very naked self-interest to avoid the consequences of their poor decision making capabilities.
Whaaaaaat, women are always so accountable!
How do you write women so well? Melvin Udall: I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.”
Conservatives are just people with a lot of inertia who don't like change. Like a big stupid rock that just sits there. They have a function, but are mostly useless.
A conservative who accepted the idea of trans kids will be opposed to the idea of banning the mutilation of children
With no force driving them, conservatives are never actually able to conserve anything. Even a big and heavy rock will be moved eventually by dedicated activists, who were usually left-wing in the past.
This means that if we want to bring back our traditions, for example, we need more rabid activists for tradition. This is difficult to achieve. Like I'm too old and busy to be much of an activist. The best target market for selling activism is colleges, but those are mostly taken over by woke ideologues.
Yeah but they called you a low-effort, gay meme name - give up chud.
I don't believe that the guy she is responding to is real. Even most "radicals" don't say things that on the nose and direct. They all have their memes and slogans and specific beliefs, not generic "revenge."
This instead reads like what a pathetic woman thinks a radical talks like. With all the autistic cadence and specific scary words.
Also, white women were never conservative or right wing. The ones that were, were doing it for "pick me" points by trying to be not like other girls on a political scale. This very comment alone is why they cannot be.
Because the moment you go towards anything above the bare minimum, they reveal that they have no balls or principles and only care about social consensus and being "kind."
Always amazes me when people act like the Internet is real and give any weight or thought to random anonymous comments. It happens on all sides, even by users here who should know better. Those of us who grew up on the uncensored internet before social media knew it was fake (but slightly less gay at the time) and it's exhausting to keep seeing not only boomers but younger people repeatedly clutch their pearls at trolls as if they were having a conversation with a real human at the supermarket. The groyper army is a great example. They don't just amplify Fuentes but also post crazy violent cartoons to troll idiots like Jordan Petersen and give his silly NGO examples of why online anonymity is bad. The other obvious example is Gamergate, aka the "right-wing misogynistic hate campaign" because anonymous users - probably the fucking journos themselves - posted insane shit for screenshots. People need to understand anons are just random chaos agents. They represent nothing and provide no insight into reality and politics. That applies to you and me too. We're basically ephemeral gamertags. What we say is noise. Maybe we'll occasionally spark an idea in a more important person higher up the chain and someone does something, but in the end only real people with real identities having conversations matters and this will all be graffiti on the walls of Pompeii.
Reminder to everyone that good ol' Anita Sarkeesian, probably the reason why journos were set and ready to start GG when ZQ's shit dropped, was almost certainly confirmed to have sent the famous "death threats" that started her career to herself.
Or that one journo early on that admitted to saving and uploading CP to try and get 8chan(?) shut down.
Almost everyone online could log off right now, and by next month not even be noticed that they left. The rare few might reach Imp level where people remember them for the memes. But otherwise its all nonsense that shouldn't be taken seriously.
But instead people invented shit like upvotes and people take text on a screen super fucking seriously.
Underrated comment deserving of its own post.
I would add in the new AI age, making fraudulent provocations has never been easier.
There is a lot of truth to this, but, you know, Gamergate. Trump. 4chan meme incubator. No one anonymous poster is important, but the scene is consequential.
That's true. We are "the keyboard warriors" after all. I'm just arguing you can't say a trend reflects reality until it translates to real actions by people who aren't anonymous and who could face consequences for saying something.
It’s “hello, fellow conservatives” all the way down.
Yeah, I'm sick of merely being a speed bump, I want to reverse course.
Not only do we need to collectivize as a race in order to protect our women and children, we have to make sure women are silent and compliant while it happens.
If the women don't have the well being of the children first and foremost in mind they're useless at best, actively detrimental at worst.
Agreed…because if we aren’t careful, kosher social engineers and propagandists will manipulate the emotions of childless women so they begin to see various recreational victim groups as their children who they must advocate for.
If we survive people are going to look back on this era far worse than the Canaanite and Carthaginian child sacrifices. At least those people had the excuse of being illiterate bronze age proto-hominids who actually believed they were gaining favor with their idols. Modern women perform child sacrifice so they can be even more repulsive druggie whores with less to worry about.
So wait,, I'm a Radical now?? Lol 😆
Their Word Salad Names get tossed around so much, I Don't even Care anymore 🤷🏼♀️
If you’re truly a conservative woman, you already know to shut up while the men speak. Female emotions poison actual conservatism, and have no place in the movement other than to support their husband’s views.
The lady right here.
"Woke right."
Why does everyone pretend this is hard to understand?
she's not woke right. its impossible for a right winger to be woke. . She's just a leftist pretending to be conservative
No need to be so autistic about this. Even James's definition of "woke right" does not mean "a woke right winger". We're not saying "woke right" is a thing, we're just saying if it was a thing than these idiots fit in that box far better than we do.
im "autistic" about it because i don't want people muddying the definition of "woke"
As gamers we all know what happens if you try to go solo in a PvP zone
Typical Leftist argument: No principles matter, no morals matter, no bad tactics, only bad targets, and those targets are always shifting.
Don't be fucking stupid. An affirmative vision of a parallel society is NOT built by doing whatever you want to 'own the libs', even if it explicitly helps the Left. an affirmative vision of a parallel society that we can grow civilization into must be created by having a working philosophy and moral frame-work. Not power for power's sakes
Says the zionist that supports israel bombing all their enemies indiscriminately. holy shit just go back to reddit already,
Unlike your mission parameters, I don't care about a bronze age people fighting a bronze age people, in a bronze age war, using bronze age tactics.
Besides, you don't have a problem with what they're doing. You have a problem that you didn't get to do it.
ok zionist
And you support israel and what they are doing but you hate it if White people did what israel does. You claim you don't care but you fly in to a rage anytime someone talks about supporting Palestine and bringing up israel's war crimes
I find it annoying when "White Nationalists" have more support for Palestine than the children of Rotherham.
White nationalists speak against the muslims grooming gangs all the time. We also speak against the people who brought muslims over to the West mainly jewish organizations like ADL.
We can support Palestine and also speak against the muslim grooming gangs in Europe. But you keep pretending like supporting Palestine means we support muslims in Europe. Which we explicetly say we don't . But you have no arguement against us so you need to make a strawman and lie about us.
Sure, real WN's speak out. Qatris and glow-niggers don't.
Supporting Palestine is supporting the grooming gangs. They have the same opinion of our daughters. They don't rabe arab children as much, or you guys are otherwise okay with it.
so i was wondering why you and other JIDFs keep going on about Qatari so much and i found out why. . Its because they own al jazeera and actually have a voice in the English speaking world isn't it? You are upset that jews and zionists dont have full dominance over the media in the English speaking world that is covering news about what's going on in the middle east
Also supporting Palestine means not supporting Talmudists who create Epstein island and hold all our countries in debt.
Easiest way to control the opposition is to lead it