BG3 has much worse issues then having gay stuff in it. The fact that everyone cheers it despite having a trash story in a story game, modern dialogue, modern day diversity and ruined Jaheira made me lose hope in gaming.
KCD 2 was kind of the last breath, "based" developer and all made me hope it will be good. It was not just that they made Henry and Hans bisexual despite being specifically straight in the first one, it was the lies and manipulation, I'm just done with that, I have enough emotional manipulation in my life as is, I don't want this in my games.
It made me realize there is never going to be games that would appeal to me. Was a bit difficult to accept but I had to.
BG3 by all accounts I've heard is a sin against everything that Baldur's Gate was. It just needed to be an adventure set in Faerun but they couldn't stop themselves, they just had to deface a masterpiece.
I’ve seriously am considering to be creator gamer. With tv and movies I rarely watch anything made after 2014 so maybe I’ll have the same policy with games. Although I really am curious to see how ES6 turns out
Go for it. But to be honest it seems a hard task for anyone. I hope AI will get to the point where games can be easily made by anyone but we're not there yet.
I am a "creator" myself, I finished 2 small games and working on a third, more ambitious one. Didn't bother selling them on Steam, but I might do it with the 3rd, I don't bother playing any western game that came out in 2010 or later.
Yeah, their double standards on everything is so out in the open now it isn't funny any longer.
FTR: The Black girl in Cuties was actually 19 at the time (iirc) and she was the one in the most controversial scenes of sexuality and/or nudity. (IDK, I never watched it)
She was portrayed as being much younger, so it's still 'kiddy p0rn' as far as that goes. The other girls were for sure very young.
She was portrayed as being much younger, so it's still 'kiddy p0rn' as far as that goes.
Which is why the CP laws ban 18+ porn stars from playing underage characters on screen. Even if you took all the actual kids out it would still be illegal.
Yes, you can. Because saying it's OK to add some sort of content simply because you can ignore it works in all forms of media. A game is not only the route you picked, it is the whole package you paid for. If your product has groomer propaganda in it, it doesn't matter if you ignore it, you are still financing groomer propaganda.
BG3 has much worse issues then having gay stuff in it. The fact that everyone cheers it despite having a trash story in a story game, modern dialogue, modern day diversity and ruined Jaheira made me lose hope in gaming.
KCD 2 was kind of the last breath, "based" developer and all made me hope it will be good. It was not just that they made Henry and Hans bisexual despite being specifically straight in the first one, it was the lies and manipulation, I'm just done with that, I have enough emotional manipulation in my life as is, I don't want this in my games.
BG3 by all accounts I've heard is a sin against everything that Baldur's Gate was. It just needed to be an adventure set in Faerun but they couldn't stop themselves, they just had to deface a masterpiece.
I’ve seriously am considering to be creator gamer. With tv and movies I rarely watch anything made after 2014 so maybe I’ll have the same policy with games. Although I really am curious to see how ES6 turns out
Go for it. But to be honest it seems a hard task for anyone. I hope AI will get to the point where games can be easily made by anyone but we're not there yet.
I am a "creator" myself, I finished 2 small games and working on a third, more ambitious one. Didn't bother selling them on Steam, but I might do it with the 3rd, I don't bother playing any western game that came out in 2010 or later.
I’m getting there. Still playing Skyrim though
thankfully you can mod out the gay and the nigger shit too
but you can't remove all the judeophile shit, that is literally embedded into the main-quest
For a second, I thought you meant BG3 and I nearly blew a fuse.
Same slop
there is like bajillion mods to remove all the gay and tranny shit on BG3
but frankly i refuse to play a game made by trannies because the writing is going to be shit regardless of mods
Yeah, their double standards on everything is so out in the open now it isn't funny any longer.
FTR: The Black girl in Cuties was actually 19 at the time (iirc) and she was the one in the most controversial scenes of sexuality and/or nudity. (IDK, I never watched it)
She was portrayed as being much younger, so it's still 'kiddy p0rn' as far as that goes. The other girls were for sure very young.
Which is why the CP laws ban 18+ porn stars from playing underage characters on screen. Even if you took all the actual kids out it would still be illegal.
BG3 literally has the smirking faggy vampire on its cover, poster, and literally everytime you see the game to open it.
That alone should put off any reasonable adult man, without any further information.
"Just don't pick the 'nigger' dialogue option" never counts in their eyes though
Missing the "REEE SEXY WOMAN WHERE ARE HER ORGANS CANCEL THIS" panel.
Post Reported for: Salacious material
Honestly, yeah. No part of Cuties should be shown. I had to remove it from the Reddit when it first came out.
Devil's advocate: can you really compare an interactive game with divergent narrative plot lines to a single narrative movie product?
Yes, you can. Because saying it's OK to add some sort of content simply because you can ignore it works in all forms of media. A game is not only the route you picked, it is the whole package you paid for. If your product has groomer propaganda in it, it doesn't matter if you ignore it, you are still financing groomer propaganda.