By his own theory he had no labor value. It’s also why the majority of socialist retards you hear pushing Marxism are the ones who would be absolutely fucked if labor value was the metric.
Yes, value is subjective and personal. If one person likes apples more than oranges they would likely see the value of an apple farm more than an orange one.
Labor is just energy spent, if it's not spent on something most people value as positive then it's either a waste of energy or possibly even a negative.
It's the "and have a positive outcome" I take issue with as wanted labor can also have a negative outcome. Take for example Jaguar's rebranding and other DEI.
Then you don't understand because what I said is that it requires all three to be true, or else labor has no value. Unwanted and/or unwarranted labor is also worthless.
This communication is going nowhere. Your point is understood and I am disputing it. I am telling you that that for social or political reasons wanted labor can have a negative outcome i.e. the goal is to lose money.
If you just want to be right on the internet, congratulations here is your trophy. I don't care.
Nah, marxists think the intelligentsia has the greatest labor value because they shape society or something. That's why you have retards thinking hassan leaving an empty chair in front of a YouTube video entitles him to a Porsche
Marx had no theory or innovative ideas of his own. He just looked at different systems and smugly pointed out they were doing things wrong. Keep that in mind when discussing communism, because that's why commies argue their failed systems weren't real
The reddit commies all think that in their tankie state they would be the bourgeois, usually a pretentious faggy artist/poet/philosopher, not realizing that in reality they would just be part of the 8 figure statistic of communism. A bunch of parasitic faggots like redditors and hasan talking about workers rights when they collectively don't have a single day of hard work under their belt is never not funny.
There would have been another. One thing he was correct about was that the french revolution was proto-communism. He was far from the first or only proponent of socialist ideologies.
The man was a Luddite. He said "fetter the machines," I remember that because I had to look up the definition of fetter. So if we were to truly, completely implement his ideology, we would be talking going back to the pre-industrial revolution. I don't think a redditor can even conceive of how antithetical that way of life would be to their own. In short, I doubt those faggots have actually paid attention when reading the Communist Manifesto.
If we're going for the full luddo-communist 'jobs jobs jobs' argument, Milton Friedman suggesting a canal china was digging by shovel be dug with spoons instead comes to mind...
By his own theory he had no labor value. It’s also why the majority of socialist retards you hear pushing Marxism are the ones who would be absolutely fucked if labor value was the metric.
After the revolution, I'll be a poetry livestreamer and have a cozy boutique publishing mill to tend!
Why are you handing me a shovel, comrade?
Labor has no inherent value whatsoever.
For labor to be valuable it must be wanted, warranted and have a positive outcome. Otherwise it is devoid of value.
Positive outcome not required, I think you mean "generate value."
A positive outcome to wanted and warranted labor is what generates value.
If you attempt to say, repair a car but fail, although it was necessary and desirable to do, you still did nothing of value.
Yes, value is subjective and personal. If one person likes apples more than oranges they would likely see the value of an apple farm more than an orange one.
Labor is just energy spent, if it's not spent on something most people value as positive then it's either a waste of energy or possibly even a negative.
It's the "and have a positive outcome" I take issue with as wanted labor can also have a negative outcome. Take for example Jaguar's rebranding and other DEI.
Then you don't understand because what I said is that it requires all three to be true, or else labor has no value. Unwanted and/or unwarranted labor is also worthless.
This communication is going nowhere. Your point is understood and I am disputing it. I am telling you that that for social or political reasons wanted labor can have a negative outcome i.e. the goal is to lose money.
If you just want to be right on the internet, congratulations here is your trophy. I don't care.
Nah, marxists think the intelligentsia has the greatest labor value because they shape society or something. That's why you have retards thinking hassan leaving an empty chair in front of a YouTube video entitles him to a Porsche
Marx had no theory or innovative ideas of his own. He just looked at different systems and smugly pointed out they were doing things wrong. Keep that in mind when discussing communism, because that's why commies argue their failed systems weren't real
Never bathed or cleaned his house, always spent his money drinking instead of feeding his family etc etc
I like how Trotsky didn't tip either.
I don't know any Jews who tip.
A true capitalist then.
The reddit commies all think that in their tankie state they would be the bourgeois, usually a pretentious faggy artist/poet/philosopher, not realizing that in reality they would just be part of the 8 figure statistic of communism. A bunch of parasitic faggots like redditors and hasan talking about workers rights when they collectively don't have a single day of hard work under their belt is never not funny.
Imagine how much less suffering the world would have endured had this motherfucker been aborted.
There would have been another. One thing he was correct about was that the french revolution was proto-communism. He was far from the first or only proponent of socialist ideologies.
The man was a Luddite. He said "fetter the machines," I remember that because I had to look up the definition of fetter. So if we were to truly, completely implement his ideology, we would be talking going back to the pre-industrial revolution. I don't think a redditor can even conceive of how antithetical that way of life would be to their own. In short, I doubt those faggots have actually paid attention when reading the Communist Manifesto.
If we're going for the full luddo-communist 'jobs jobs jobs' argument, Milton Friedman suggesting a canal china was digging by shovel be dug with spoons instead comes to mind...
I refused to do any of his missions in Assassin’s Creed Syndicate and was disappointed that you couldn’t kill him.
Wait he was in that game That's crazy they should have allowed you to assassinate that fat worthless fucking piece of shit
He was an alternate quest-giver.
Sounds like he was even worse than that, which is impressive in it's own way
There's a common thread with Reddit and Marx
Wow. I can't disagree with this sentiment. Armchair socialists start with Marx.