That's because we keep interfering and getting involved.
I think the middle east will sort itself out if we just don't get involved for 30 years, a few countries won't exist after but we won't have to deal with it.
That was like something they were crying about involving Trump for ages. "How DARE you abandon our allies, the KURDS??!!?!" Screeched over and over again
Globalist propaganda is always in favor of Kurds. America and israel's foreign policies are always supportive of Kurds. American and israeli soldiers work together with the Kurds. i've seen some on the right in America are even duped in to thinking the Kurds are good.
Definitely Bush. They were being heavily promoted in the Iraq war. People were saying we should divide Iraq into three countries and give the north to Kurds. Fox News had many stories showing how peaceful and pro-western the Kurds were.
The Kurds are good fighters and actually want some semblance of a society where they are not being ethnically exterminated by the Sunni, Shia, or Turks.
You shouldn't love the PKK because they are a literal terrorist group, and are communists.
All I mean is they propose some system that doesn't actually have to work until after you've given them the keys to everything. When they're not actually governing, their philosophy means nothing. That's why the Azov doesn't bother Ukraine. "They want to fight Russian?" no1curr why. After Russians gone we can deal with them being national socialist.
It's worse because I think they believe that sending out Azov will kill enough of them to stop the movement in it's tracks. Instead they are gaining political legitimacy. It's going to blow up in their face.
To your original point, it's hard to nail them down still. Some will lie, some are honest. Hell, the Nazis themselves were revolutionaries that promised to revoke the constitution if put into power. They absolutely did that. They lied about other issues. But not all of them.
I mean sending them out works for killing the rest of Ukrainian men, but maybe these guys are tougher stuff. I think such political legitimacy that they may have has to do with their fighting. They supported the winners of the last civil war, so they got a place in the new structure. Ideologically, yes, Ukrainians would be better to reject Azov help. Practically, I don't know that they can.
huh.. just realized.. kurds are really sand jews.
Kurds=Khazarians
This why they should have their own state and fucking stay there forever.
We should do the same for many of the problem groups.
Don't most kurds say they don't want their own state?
Too bad, they're getting one and being held there indefinitely!
i mean we gave jews a state of their own and look how that turned out, things haven't improved with them at all.
That's because we keep interfering and getting involved.
I think the middle east will sort itself out if we just don't get involved for 30 years, a few countries won't exist after but we won't have to deal with it.
WE don't get involved with their politics. THEY get involved with ours and keep using us to fight their wars for them. .
"Please ignore the ideology of these people so I can make it an argument about the ethnic group as a whole".
Give them Ukraine.
Since when have we loved the Kurds
That was like something they were crying about involving Trump for ages. "How DARE you abandon our allies, the KURDS??!!?!" Screeched over and over again
Globalist propaganda is always in favor of Kurds. America and israel's foreign policies are always supportive of Kurds. American and israeli soldiers work together with the Kurds. i've seen some on the right in America are even duped in to thinking the Kurds are good.
Either the Obama administration or possibly the Bush administration started the propaganda push iirc.
Definitely Bush. They were being heavily promoted in the Iraq war. People were saying we should divide Iraq into three countries and give the north to Kurds. Fox News had many stories showing how peaceful and pro-western the Kurds were.
The Kurds are good fighters and actually want some semblance of a society where they are not being ethnically exterminated by the Sunni, Shia, or Turks.
You shouldn't love the PKK because they are a literal terrorist group, and are communists.
Seems like every freedom fighter group adopts either communism or fascism. They don't have to do much actual governing.
Not really. Plenty evoke nationalism, monarchism, theocracy, and more. Rebel groups aren't really ideologically homogenous.
All I mean is they propose some system that doesn't actually have to work until after you've given them the keys to everything. When they're not actually governing, their philosophy means nothing. That's why the Azov doesn't bother Ukraine. "They want to fight Russian?" no1curr why. After Russians gone we can deal with them being national socialist.
It's worse because I think they believe that sending out Azov will kill enough of them to stop the movement in it's tracks. Instead they are gaining political legitimacy. It's going to blow up in their face.
To your original point, it's hard to nail them down still. Some will lie, some are honest. Hell, the Nazis themselves were revolutionaries that promised to revoke the constitution if put into power. They absolutely did that. They lied about other issues. But not all of them.
I mean sending them out works for killing the rest of Ukrainian men, but maybe these guys are tougher stuff. I think such political legitimacy that they may have has to do with their fighting. They supported the winners of the last civil war, so they got a place in the new structure. Ideologically, yes, Ukrainians would be better to reject Azov help. Practically, I don't know that they can.
The PKK is a Communist terrorist organization. That is why.