America put "freedom of thought and freedom of press" in to the Japanese constitution whilst at the same time burning over 7000 different books in Japan and using police force against people who rebelled against this book seizure. And all media after that had to have 2 copies of everything , sending a copy to the occupational forces to get "approval" and get censored according to what the occupational forces wanted. The hypocracy is hilarious.
Btw "freedom of press and freedom of thought" was put in the constitution for the benefit of commies, because imperial Japan used to jail communists. After the war, America freed the commies that Imperial Japan had jailed
I explained in my comment. Imperial Japan used to jail communists. So America originally put freedom of press and freedom of thought in to the constitution to protect the commies.
I'm sure they wanted to shake down Japan's political structure, but the wording is ironic because communism typically demands the removal of those freedoms.
communism typically demands the removal of those freedoms.
Only once the commies think their control has reached a point where they can't be stopped. When they're the scrappy underdog, they are all for free speech.
Well yes, but the same can be said for any group when they're the underdog. The modification of Japan's constitution would have happened after the atomic bombs were dropped and Japan had already surrendered, so by that point America is not really the scrappy underdog. This just seems like a weird point to attack the U.S. on. Is the implication here that freedom of thought is somehow bad?
The implication is , that too few people know that America engaged in massive book burning despite bitching about Germany doing that and despite claiming to be "for freedom of thought and press". Why is this part of history hidden?
Going to sound callous. But that’s what happens when you LOSE A WAR.
Don’t be a Japanophile. The Japanese did some fucked up shit in wwii. They also were retarded. They had no end game and severely misunderstood the US ((government’s)) appetite for a long war in the pacific
What’s the point of pointing out the “hypocrisy of the system”? It’s self congratulatory. The real hypocrisy is the hypocrisy of the governed: constantly complaining about the that of three government, but unwilling to do anything about it.
In case people get confused on why the link leads to "item not found" the original link is supposed to include the dot at the end but for some reason when the link is posted here the dot is not included with the link. So when you click on the link be sure to add a dot at the end of the link
Weird how that was more than 50 pages in. Strange how I didn't get there. Almost like I said that already.
Anyway, yes, with titles like "jews, the face of communism" being banned, it's weird how people think it's banning nazi propagandists and their bullshit.
Why are you so salty? Im only bringing up the fact that the Allied powers went around condemning others for book burning whilst doing the same thing themselves. And also hiding that fact cause not many people know about that.
We all have pattern recognition. We all know exactly what this is about. It's hilarious that you're even pretending this isn't a thinly veiled "nazis good, muh jews bad" post.
I'm saying you obviously believe you're inferior to them, given they apparently control the world (based on your beliefs), and you're seething daily about it.
But reading comprehension isn't your strong point, we're all aware.
Is a Counterstrike player who uses cheats a better player than everyone else or just an asshole who breaks the rules ruining the game for everyone else?
America put "freedom of thought and freedom of press" in to the Japanese constitution whilst at the same time burning over 7000 different books in Japan and using police force against people who rebelled against this book seizure. And all media after that had to have 2 copies of everything , sending a copy to the occupational forces to get "approval" and get censored according to what the occupational forces wanted. The hypocracy is hilarious.
Btw "freedom of press and freedom of thought" was put in the constitution for the benefit of commies, because imperial Japan used to jail communists. After the war, America freed the commies that Imperial Japan had jailed
wut
I explained in my comment. Imperial Japan used to jail communists. So America originally put freedom of press and freedom of thought in to the constitution to protect the commies.
I'm sure they wanted to shake down Japan's political structure, but the wording is ironic because communism typically demands the removal of those freedoms.
Only once the commies think their control has reached a point where they can't be stopped. When they're the scrappy underdog, they are all for free speech.
Well yes, but the same can be said for any group when they're the underdog. The modification of Japan's constitution would have happened after the atomic bombs were dropped and Japan had already surrendered, so by that point America is not really the scrappy underdog. This just seems like a weird point to attack the U.S. on. Is the implication here that freedom of thought is somehow bad?
The implication is , that too few people know that America engaged in massive book burning despite bitching about Germany doing that and despite claiming to be "for freedom of thought and press". Why is this part of history hidden?
Going to sound callous. But that’s what happens when you LOSE A WAR.
Don’t be a Japanophile. The Japanese did some fucked up shit in wwii. They also were retarded. They had no end game and severely misunderstood the US ((government’s)) appetite for a long war in the pacific
What’s the point of pointing out the “hypocrisy of the system”? It’s self congratulatory. The real hypocrisy is the hypocrisy of the governed: constantly complaining about the that of three government, but unwilling to do anything about it.
Okay stormfag, what books were supposedly banned/burned/etc? Where's the list? Is there a reason you can't provide one?
https://archive.org/details/AbteilungFuerVolksbildungDerStadtBerlinVerzeichnisDerAuszusonderndenLiteratur1946187S./
Have fun.
In case people get confused on why the link leads to "item not found" the original link is supposed to include the dot at the end but for some reason when the link is posted here the dot is not included with the link. So when you click on the link be sure to add a dot at the end of the link
Okay, so where's the list of books?
I see them rooting out nazis, which obviously they didn't go far enough
Ah. There it is. Supporting book burnings.
Okay stormfag. Enjoy your coping and seething.
You ask me where the list of books is after I linked you the list of books?
Yeah, I scrolled through about 50 pages, and saw a bunch of bullshit about "these people are nazi propagandists" and a bunch of names of people.
No book names.
And rooting out nazis is only a good thing. They didn't do a good enough job of eliminating them though.
A1 are banned authors
A2 are banned books
A3 are banned publishers
Put a bit of effort into the role you're playing.
Weird how that was more than 50 pages in. Strange how I didn't get there. Almost like I said that already.
Anyway, yes, with titles like "jews, the face of communism" being banned, it's weird how people think it's banning nazi propagandists and their bullshit.
I can't figure out why they would. Really odd.
Ever heard of something called "table of contents"? It's on page 3.
Ah, yes, the infinite cope of "you're a jew".
I'm still not. But in your world, everyone who calls you out on your faggotry must be a jew, because you're a cultist retard.
Cool story stormfag.
Sorry if the truth hurts.
The truth that I'm not a jew? Why would that hurt me.
I'm sure it hurts you. But continue coping and seething about your belief you're inferior to jews.
You understand this conversation is public, right?
Anyways, you look like a tool here.
Is this today's topic for you? "Being opposed to freedom of thought is a good thing, everybody else is doing it!"
Why are you so salty? Im only bringing up the fact that the Allied powers went around condemning others for book burning whilst doing the same thing themselves. And also hiding that fact cause not many people know about that.
It's his hooked nose. He can't help it.
I'm just pointing out your most recent schtick for bouncing on Hitler's dick is all.
Which might be relevant if this topic had actually mentioned Hitler, Nazis, or Jews.
We all have pattern recognition. We all know exactly what this is about. It's hilarious that you're even pretending this isn't a thinly veiled "nazis good, muh jews bad" post.
Like I said, it's another post on the same topic for the same reason for OP.
His endless seething about the jews is hilarious. It's telling that he believes he's inferior to them.
We already know that the talmud says non jews are animals you don't have to remind us
I'm saying you obviously believe you're inferior to them, given they apparently control the world (based on your beliefs), and you're seething daily about it.
But reading comprehension isn't your strong point, we're all aware.
Is a Counterstrike player who uses cheats a better player than everyone else or just an asshole who breaks the rules ruining the game for everyone else?